Comparative quantum chemical analysis of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone: electronic structure, and reactivity indices using DFT

IF 2.5 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Masoumeh Eskandari-Nasab, Zainab Moosavi-Tekyeh, Mansoureh Zahedi-Tabrizi
{"title":"Comparative quantum chemical analysis of dexamethasone and hydrocortisone: electronic structure, and reactivity indices using DFT","authors":"Masoumeh Eskandari-Nasab,&nbsp;Zainab Moosavi-Tekyeh,&nbsp;Mansoureh Zahedi-Tabrizi","doi":"10.1007/s00894-025-06522-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><p>The biological activity of steroidal compounds such as dexamethasone (DX) and hydrocortisone (HC) is closely linked to subtle variations in their molecular structure and electronic properties. This study provides a comparative quantum chemical analysis of DX and HC to clarify how these differences influence hydrogen bonding strength, reactivity, and their potential interactions with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Optimized geometries, natural bond orbital (NBO) analyses, frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), global reactivity descriptors, and average local ionization energy (ALIE) calculations demonstrate that DX exhibits greater polarity and electrophilic character compared to HC. These differences help explain the stronger receptor binding affinity observed for DX. Indeed, notably, despite the inherent limitations of gas-phase DFT calculations compared to experimental X-ray data, the theoretical results exhibit good agreement with experimental observations, suggesting the reliability of the computational approach in predicting molecular interactions within the GR active site.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>All quantum chemical calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP functional and 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. Structural optimization, FMO analysis, global reactivity descriptors, and dipole moment evaluations were carried out in Gaussian 09. NBO analysis was performed with NBO 5.0. Average local ionization energy (ALIE) surfaces were generated using Multiwfn 3.8, and molecular visualizations were produced with GaussView 5.0.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","volume":"31 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-025-06522-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

The biological activity of steroidal compounds such as dexamethasone (DX) and hydrocortisone (HC) is closely linked to subtle variations in their molecular structure and electronic properties. This study provides a comparative quantum chemical analysis of DX and HC to clarify how these differences influence hydrogen bonding strength, reactivity, and their potential interactions with the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Optimized geometries, natural bond orbital (NBO) analyses, frontier molecular orbitals (FMO), global reactivity descriptors, and average local ionization energy (ALIE) calculations demonstrate that DX exhibits greater polarity and electrophilic character compared to HC. These differences help explain the stronger receptor binding affinity observed for DX. Indeed, notably, despite the inherent limitations of gas-phase DFT calculations compared to experimental X-ray data, the theoretical results exhibit good agreement with experimental observations, suggesting the reliability of the computational approach in predicting molecular interactions within the GR active site.

Methods

All quantum chemical calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) with the B3LYP functional and 6-311++G(d,p) basis set. Structural optimization, FMO analysis, global reactivity descriptors, and dipole moment evaluations were carried out in Gaussian 09. NBO analysis was performed with NBO 5.0. Average local ionization energy (ALIE) surfaces were generated using Multiwfn 3.8, and molecular visualizations were produced with GaussView 5.0.

Abstract Image

地塞米松和氢化可的松的比较量子化学分析:电子结构和DFT反应性指数。
背景:类固醇化合物如地塞米松(DX)和氢化可的松(HC)的生物活性与其分子结构和电子性质的细微变化密切相关。本研究提供了DX和HC的比较量子化学分析,以阐明这些差异如何影响氢键强度、反应性及其与糖皮质激素受体(GR)的潜在相互作用。优化的几何形状、自然键轨道(NBO)分析、前沿分子轨道(FMO)、整体反应性描述子和平均局部电离能(ALIE)计算表明,与HC相比,DX具有更强的极性和亲电性。这些差异有助于解释观察到的DX更强的受体结合亲和力。事实上,值得注意的是,尽管气相DFT计算与实验x射线数据相比存在固有的局限性,但理论结果与实验观察结果吻合良好,表明计算方法在预测GR活性位点内分子相互作用方面是可靠的。方法:所有量子化学计算均采用密度泛函理论(DFT),采用B3LYP泛函和6-311++G(d,p)基集。在Gaussian 09中进行了结构优化、FMO分析、全局反应性描述符和偶极矩评估。采用NBO 5.0软件进行NBO分析。使用Multiwfn 3.8生成平均局部电离能(ALIE)表面,使用GaussView 5.0生成分子可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Modeling
Journal of Molecular Modeling 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
362
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Modeling focuses on "hardcore" modeling, publishing high-quality research and reports. Founded in 1995 as a purely electronic journal, it has adapted its format to include a full-color print edition, and adjusted its aims and scope fit the fast-changing field of molecular modeling, with a particular focus on three-dimensional modeling. Today, the journal covers all aspects of molecular modeling including life science modeling; materials modeling; new methods; and computational chemistry. Topics include computer-aided molecular design; rational drug design, de novo ligand design, receptor modeling and docking; cheminformatics, data analysis, visualization and mining; computational medicinal chemistry; homology modeling; simulation of peptides, DNA and other biopolymers; quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and ADME-modeling; modeling of biological reaction mechanisms; and combined experimental and computational studies in which calculations play a major role.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信