Income Inequality and Water Quality in the U.S.: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Disparities and Environmental Outcomes

IF 0.8 Q4 ECONOMICS
Hale Kirer Silva Lecuna, Billur Cohen
{"title":"Income Inequality and Water Quality in the U.S.: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Disparities and Environmental Outcomes","authors":"Hale Kirer Silva Lecuna,&nbsp;Billur Cohen","doi":"10.1007/s11293-025-09827-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzes the relationship between income inequality and water pollution in the United States. Unlike prior studies that rely on cross-country comparisons or primarily focus on air pollution, this study makes a novel contribution by examining how income inequality influences water pollution over time within the United States, providing insights relevant to national policy interventions. Using the autoregressive distributed lag model, both the short- and long-run effects of urbanization, income, and income inequality on water quality are examined. The analysis employs nationally aggregated data spanning from 1969 to 2020, using dissolved oxygen as the primary indicator of water quality. Data sources include the United States Census Bureau, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and the Global Environmental Monitoring System. Our results indicate that a more equitable distribution of income has adverse effects on water quality in the long term. Conversely, the proportion of income accounted for by the top five percent of the population and urbanization both have adverse impacts on water quality, suggesting that income concentration at the top and fast urban growth are responsible for worsening water conditions. Increases in gross domestic product per capita improve water quality both in the short and long run. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring environmental policy to account for disparities in income structure. Improving water infrastructure in less affluent communities and regulating pollution-intensive activities in high-income areas could help mitigate inequality-driven environmental risks and support public health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"53 3","pages":"197 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09827-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the relationship between income inequality and water pollution in the United States. Unlike prior studies that rely on cross-country comparisons or primarily focus on air pollution, this study makes a novel contribution by examining how income inequality influences water pollution over time within the United States, providing insights relevant to national policy interventions. Using the autoregressive distributed lag model, both the short- and long-run effects of urbanization, income, and income inequality on water quality are examined. The analysis employs nationally aggregated data spanning from 1969 to 2020, using dissolved oxygen as the primary indicator of water quality. Data sources include the United States Census Bureau, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and the Global Environmental Monitoring System. Our results indicate that a more equitable distribution of income has adverse effects on water quality in the long term. Conversely, the proportion of income accounted for by the top five percent of the population and urbanization both have adverse impacts on water quality, suggesting that income concentration at the top and fast urban growth are responsible for worsening water conditions. Increases in gross domestic product per capita improve water quality both in the short and long run. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring environmental policy to account for disparities in income structure. Improving water infrastructure in less affluent communities and regulating pollution-intensive activities in high-income areas could help mitigate inequality-driven environmental risks and support public health.

Abstract Image

收入不平等与美国水质:经济差异与环境结果的实证分析
本研究分析了美国收入不平等与水污染之间的关系。与之前依赖于跨国比较或主要关注空气污染的研究不同,这项研究通过研究收入不平等如何影响美国国内的水污染,为国家政策干预提供了相关见解,做出了新的贡献。采用自回归分布滞后模型,考察了城市化、收入和收入不平等对水质的短期和长期影响。该分析采用了1969年至2020年的全国汇总数据,将溶解氧作为水质的主要指标。数据来源包括美国人口普查局、世界银行、圣路易斯联邦储备银行和全球环境监测系统。我们的研究结果表明,从长远来看,更公平的收入分配对水质有不利影响。相反,收入最高的5%人口所占的收入比例和城市化都对水质产生了不利影响,这表明,收入集中在最高人群和城市快速增长是造成水质恶化的原因。人均国内生产总值的增加在短期和长期都能改善水质。这些发现强调了调整环境政策以解释收入结构差异的重要性。改善不太富裕社区的水基础设施和规范高收入地区的污染密集型活动,有助于减轻不平等导致的环境风险,并支持公共卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信