Quality of Education and Economic Growth

IF 0.8 Q4 ECONOMICS
Kalyan Chakraborty
{"title":"Quality of Education and Economic Growth","authors":"Kalyan Chakraborty","doi":"10.1007/s11293-025-09826-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The conventional method of estimating the effect of education on economic growth is to estimate cross-country growth regressions using the annual growth of gross domestic product as a dependent variable and average number of years of schooling in a population and other macroeconomic factors as explanatory variables. Since students in different countries with the same number of years in school have different learning outcomes, cross-country studies that use quantity of schooling instead of quality of educational attainment and/or individual skills fail to capture the impact of human capital on economic growth. This study attempts to fill this gap using recently developed quality-adjusted educational attainment data from 53 countries over a 40-year period (1970–2010) and examines the significance of educational skills on economic growth. Several macroeconomic factors (e.g., government expenditure, growth of fixed capital, average longevity of the population, and trade as a percentage of gross domestic product) were used as control variables. The primary data source for the macroeconomic variables was the World Bank World Development Indicators. Cross country data on quality-adjusted educational attainment data came from three diverse sources: Lee and Lee, Barro and Lee, and Altinok and Diebolt. The empirical study used the dynamic generalized method of moments model that addresses the potential problem of endogeneity and causality, common issues in growth regressions. The study found that when human capital is measured by skill and learning, it is strongly associated with economic growth. Since educational institutions are the major source for developing cognitive skills, policies to improve educational attainment through investment in education would promote economic growth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"53 3","pages":"125 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09826-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional method of estimating the effect of education on economic growth is to estimate cross-country growth regressions using the annual growth of gross domestic product as a dependent variable and average number of years of schooling in a population and other macroeconomic factors as explanatory variables. Since students in different countries with the same number of years in school have different learning outcomes, cross-country studies that use quantity of schooling instead of quality of educational attainment and/or individual skills fail to capture the impact of human capital on economic growth. This study attempts to fill this gap using recently developed quality-adjusted educational attainment data from 53 countries over a 40-year period (1970–2010) and examines the significance of educational skills on economic growth. Several macroeconomic factors (e.g., government expenditure, growth of fixed capital, average longevity of the population, and trade as a percentage of gross domestic product) were used as control variables. The primary data source for the macroeconomic variables was the World Bank World Development Indicators. Cross country data on quality-adjusted educational attainment data came from three diverse sources: Lee and Lee, Barro and Lee, and Altinok and Diebolt. The empirical study used the dynamic generalized method of moments model that addresses the potential problem of endogeneity and causality, common issues in growth regressions. The study found that when human capital is measured by skill and learning, it is strongly associated with economic growth. Since educational institutions are the major source for developing cognitive skills, policies to improve educational attainment through investment in education would promote economic growth.

教育质量与经济增长
估计教育对经济增长影响的传统方法是使用国内生产总值的年增长率作为因变量,人口的平均受教育年数和其他宏观经济因素作为解释变量来估计跨国增长回归。由于不同国家受教育年限相同的学生的学习成果不同,使用受教育时间而不是受教育质量和/或个人技能的跨国研究无法捕捉人力资本对经济增长的影响。本研究试图利用最近开发的53个国家40年间(1970-2010)经质量调整的受教育程度数据来填补这一空白,并检验教育技能对经济增长的重要性。几个宏观经济因素(如政府支出、固定资本增长、人口平均寿命和贸易占国内生产总值的百分比)被用作控制变量。宏观经济变量的主要数据来源是世界银行的《世界发展指标》。跨国家的经质量调整的受教育程度数据来自三个不同的来源:Lee和Lee, Barro和Lee, Altinok和Diebolt。实证研究采用动态广义矩模型方法,解决了内生性和因果性的潜在问题,这是增长回归中常见的问题。研究发现,当以技能和学习来衡量人力资本时,它与经济增长密切相关。由于教育机构是发展认知技能的主要来源,通过教育投资提高受教育程度的政策将促进经济增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信