Out of the Spotlight: A Long-Run Approach to College American Football Attendance in Division III

IF 0.8 Q4 ECONOMICS
Paul A. Natke, Gregory A. Falls, Linlan Xiao
{"title":"Out of the Spotlight: A Long-Run Approach to College American Football Attendance in Division III","authors":"Paul A. Natke,&nbsp;Gregory A. Falls,&nbsp;Linlan Xiao","doi":"10.1007/s11293-025-09830-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>American college football attendance in Division III, the lowest level of National Collegiate Athletic Association-sanctioned play, has been ignored. Attendance and associated financial flows are far lower than the highest levels of competition. Although the scale of operations is lower, the relative indirect benefits to Division III colleges can be substantial. This study takes a long-run approach using a balanced panel (208 teams over 20 years) to discover primary driving forces on average season attendance from among economic, team performance and demographic measures. Fixed- and random-effects models are estimated. The state’s monthly unemployment rate and real travel cost exert no impact. Attendance decreases as real incomes rise, suggesting these games are inferior goods. Winning games matters. More wins in the current season and the previous two seasons, and more playoff appearances in the last ten years all increase attendance. Habit persistence is present although its magnitude decreases as the lag increases. An increase in lifetime winning percentage also increases attendance in the random-effects model. Greater male undergraduate enrollment increases attendance. Higher county populations reduce attendance in the random-effects model. Findings suggest that building a successful team, as measured by winning games, is the most important determinant of fan attendance in Division III. This relationship holds in the short run (i.e., current season, recent previous seasons) and over longer periods (last ten years and lifetime of the program). Even at this lower level of competition, there is pressure on football coaches to win.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"53 3","pages":"183 - 195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09830-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

American college football attendance in Division III, the lowest level of National Collegiate Athletic Association-sanctioned play, has been ignored. Attendance and associated financial flows are far lower than the highest levels of competition. Although the scale of operations is lower, the relative indirect benefits to Division III colleges can be substantial. This study takes a long-run approach using a balanced panel (208 teams over 20 years) to discover primary driving forces on average season attendance from among economic, team performance and demographic measures. Fixed- and random-effects models are estimated. The state’s monthly unemployment rate and real travel cost exert no impact. Attendance decreases as real incomes rise, suggesting these games are inferior goods. Winning games matters. More wins in the current season and the previous two seasons, and more playoff appearances in the last ten years all increase attendance. Habit persistence is present although its magnitude decreases as the lag increases. An increase in lifetime winning percentage also increases attendance in the random-effects model. Greater male undergraduate enrollment increases attendance. Higher county populations reduce attendance in the random-effects model. Findings suggest that building a successful team, as measured by winning games, is the most important determinant of fan attendance in Division III. This relationship holds in the short run (i.e., current season, recent previous seasons) and over longer periods (last ten years and lifetime of the program). Even at this lower level of competition, there is pressure on football coaches to win.

在聚光灯下:一个长期的方法,以大学美式橄榄球出勤率在三级
美国大学橄榄球第三赛区的上座率一直被忽视,这是美国大学体育协会(National Collegiate Athletic association)认可的最低级别比赛。上座率和相关资金流远低于最高水平的竞争。虽然运营规模较小,但对三级学院的相对间接好处是可观的。本研究采用长期方法,使用平衡面板(208支球队超过20年)从经济,球队表现和人口统计指标中发现平均赛季上座率的主要驱动力。估计了固定效应和随机效应模型。该州的月失业率和实际旅行成本没有影响。上座率随着实际收入的增加而下降,这表明这些游戏是次品。赢得比赛很重要。本赛季和前两个赛季更多的胜利,以及过去十年更多的季后赛出场都会增加上座率。习惯的持久性是存在的,尽管它的大小随着滞后的增加而减小。在随机效应模型中,终身中奖率的增加也会增加出勤率。更多的男性本科生入学率提高了出勤率。在随机效应模型中,较高的县人口减少了出勤率。研究结果表明,建立一支成功的球队,以赢得比赛为衡量标准,是第三级联赛球迷出勤率的最重要决定因素。这种关系适用于短期(即当前季节,最近的前几季)和长期(最近十年和节目的整个生命周期)。即使在这种较低水平的比赛中,足球教练也面临着取胜的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信