Shakedown Limit Analysis of Layered Slab Track Substructures

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Qingzhi Ye, Ge Yang, David P. Connolly, Qiang Luo, Kaiwen Liu, Tengfei Wang
{"title":"Shakedown Limit Analysis of Layered Slab Track Substructures","authors":"Qingzhi Ye, Ge Yang, David P. Connolly, Qiang Luo, Kaiwen Liu, Tengfei Wang","doi":"10.1002/nag.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shakedown analysis provides a mechanistic criterion for evaluating the long‐term stability of geomaterials subjected to infinite loading cycles, such as those induced by highways and railways. This study focuses on prefabricated slab tracks in high‐speed rail and introduces a computational method that explicitly considers stress responses at two critical locations: structural expansion joints and continuous slabs. Although expansion joints have occasionally been mentioned in prior studies, their role in shakedown analysis has not been systematically investigated. Addressing this gap, the present work extends the analysis to better reflect actual service conditions of slab tracks. By superimposing computed stress fields with self‐weight stresses, shakedown analyses of a two‐layer subgrade system were performed under varying soil parameters, following Melan's lower‐bound theorem. Results show that the trackbed surface is the most critical stress location. When the surface friction angle increases from 30° to 60°, shakedown capacity improves by about 32%, demonstrating that enhancing soil strength can significantly extend slab track design life. In contrast, increasing the stiffness ratio between the surface and bottom layers markedly reduces shakedown capacity, highlighting the importance of controlling stiffness contrasts within the subgrade. Thickness ratio variations also influence capacity, though less strongly. For practical application, a simplified closed‐form solution is proposed to estimate the bounds of shakedown axle loads at different train speeds. Overall, this study quantifies the sensitivity of shakedown capacity to key soil parameters and demonstrates that expansion joints play a pivotal role in governing track performance, thereby guiding safer, more durable slab track subgrades.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shakedown analysis provides a mechanistic criterion for evaluating the long‐term stability of geomaterials subjected to infinite loading cycles, such as those induced by highways and railways. This study focuses on prefabricated slab tracks in high‐speed rail and introduces a computational method that explicitly considers stress responses at two critical locations: structural expansion joints and continuous slabs. Although expansion joints have occasionally been mentioned in prior studies, their role in shakedown analysis has not been systematically investigated. Addressing this gap, the present work extends the analysis to better reflect actual service conditions of slab tracks. By superimposing computed stress fields with self‐weight stresses, shakedown analyses of a two‐layer subgrade system were performed under varying soil parameters, following Melan's lower‐bound theorem. Results show that the trackbed surface is the most critical stress location. When the surface friction angle increases from 30° to 60°, shakedown capacity improves by about 32%, demonstrating that enhancing soil strength can significantly extend slab track design life. In contrast, increasing the stiffness ratio between the surface and bottom layers markedly reduces shakedown capacity, highlighting the importance of controlling stiffness contrasts within the subgrade. Thickness ratio variations also influence capacity, though less strongly. For practical application, a simplified closed‐form solution is proposed to estimate the bounds of shakedown axle loads at different train speeds. Overall, this study quantifies the sensitivity of shakedown capacity to key soil parameters and demonstrates that expansion joints play a pivotal role in governing track performance, thereby guiding safer, more durable slab track subgrades.
层状板状轨道下部结构安定极限分析
安定分析为评估岩土材料在无限循环荷载作用下的长期稳定性提供了一种力学标准,例如公路和铁路引起的循环荷载。本研究的重点是高速铁路中的预制板轨道,并介绍了一种明确考虑两个关键位置应力响应的计算方法:结构伸缩缝和连续板。虽然在以前的研究中偶尔提到膨胀节,但它们在安定分析中的作用尚未得到系统的研究。为了解决这一差距,本工作扩展了分析,以更好地反映板轨的实际使用情况。通过将计算应力场与自重应力叠加,根据Melan下界定理,对两层路基系统进行了不同土壤参数下的安定分析。结果表明,履带表面是最关键的应力位置。当表面摩擦角从30°增加到60°时,沉降能力提高约32%,表明提高土体强度可以显著延长板式轨道设计寿命。相反,增加表层和底层之间的刚度比显著降低安定能力,突出了控制路基内部刚度对比的重要性。厚度比的变化也会影响容量,尽管影响不大。在实际应用中,提出了一个简化的封闭解来估计不同列车速度下安定轴载荷的边界。总体而言,本研究量化了安定能力对关键土壤参数的敏感性,并表明伸缩缝在控制轨道性能方面起着关键作用,从而指导更安全、更耐用的板式轨道路基。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信