Six Steps to Begin a Quality Improvement Collaborative.

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.397106
John Petrilli, Karo G Ohanian, Randy Xun, Dana Neutze
{"title":"Six Steps to Begin a Quality Improvement Collaborative.","authors":"John Petrilli, Karo G Ohanian, Randy Xun, Dana Neutze","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.397106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) are increasingly used in graduate medical education to enhance clinical outcomes and meet educational objectives. While they offer potential benefits, such as driving systemic change and developing best practices, multi-institutional QI efforts face unique challenges, and no consolidated guidance exists to help faculty navigate them. Drawing on literature and personal experience, we outline six steps to help educators overcome hurdles associated with launching a QIC: (1) choose a goal aligned with organizational priorities; (2) recruit a multidisciplinary team; (3) craft a clear and generalizable aim statement; (4) select preexisting, nationally-recognized metrics; (5) navigate institutional review board requirements; and (6) plan meetings around key milestones. These steps will help medical educators anticipate common hurdles, secure administrative support, and foster effective collaboration across institutions. Personal illustrations accompany each step. By following this framework, educators can more confidently lead QICs to engage learners and improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.397106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) are increasingly used in graduate medical education to enhance clinical outcomes and meet educational objectives. While they offer potential benefits, such as driving systemic change and developing best practices, multi-institutional QI efforts face unique challenges, and no consolidated guidance exists to help faculty navigate them. Drawing on literature and personal experience, we outline six steps to help educators overcome hurdles associated with launching a QIC: (1) choose a goal aligned with organizational priorities; (2) recruit a multidisciplinary team; (3) craft a clear and generalizable aim statement; (4) select preexisting, nationally-recognized metrics; (5) navigate institutional review board requirements; and (6) plan meetings around key milestones. These steps will help medical educators anticipate common hurdles, secure administrative support, and foster effective collaboration across institutions. Personal illustrations accompany each step. By following this framework, educators can more confidently lead QICs to engage learners and improve patient care.

开始质量改进协作的六个步骤。
质量改进协作(QICs)越来越多地用于研究生医学教育,以提高临床结果和满足教育目标。虽然它们提供了潜在的好处,比如推动系统变革和开发最佳实践,但多机构的QI努力面临着独特的挑战,而且没有统一的指导来帮助教师应对这些挑战。根据文献和个人经验,我们概述了帮助教育工作者克服与启动QIC相关的障碍的六个步骤:(1)选择与组织优先级一致的目标;(2)组建多学科团队;(3)制定一个清晰、概括的目标陈述;(4)选择预先存在的、国家认可的指标;(5)了解机构审查委员会的要求;(6)围绕关键里程碑计划会议。这些步骤将帮助医学教育工作者预测常见的障碍,确保行政支持,并促进各机构之间的有效合作。个人插图伴随每一步。通过遵循这一框架,教育工作者可以更自信地领导质量保证中心吸引学习者并改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信