Deciding how to decide the correct double-lumen tube: a narrative review of methods and evidence.

IF 3.1
M Rispoli, G Calgaro, G Strano, G L Rosboch, D Massullo, F Piccirillo, M R Nespoli, F Coppolino, F Piccioni
{"title":"Deciding how to decide the correct double-lumen tube: a narrative review of methods and evidence.","authors":"M Rispoli, G Calgaro, G Strano, G L Rosboch, D Massullo, F Piccirillo, M R Nespoli, F Coppolino, F Piccioni","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00286-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The selection of the appropriate size of a double-lumen tube (DLT) is a critical yet often underestimated aspect of thoracic anaesthesia. The present narrative review evaluates traditional and emerging methods for determining DLT size, including anthropometric formulas, chest X-rays, CT scans, and ultrasonography. Despite the prevalence of height- and gender-based predictions, mounting evidence underscores their restricted correlation with airway anatomy. Chest X-rays and CT scans have been shown to offer more accurate estimations of tracheobronchial dimensions, while ultrasound has been identified as a promising bedside tool. Recent meta-analytic evidence and technological advancements, including 3D reconstruction and AI-based modelling, may support a more personalised and safer approach. It is recommended that a pragmatic, image-guided strategy be employed to minimise airway trauma, improve lung isolation, and optimise patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00286-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The selection of the appropriate size of a double-lumen tube (DLT) is a critical yet often underestimated aspect of thoracic anaesthesia. The present narrative review evaluates traditional and emerging methods for determining DLT size, including anthropometric formulas, chest X-rays, CT scans, and ultrasonography. Despite the prevalence of height- and gender-based predictions, mounting evidence underscores their restricted correlation with airway anatomy. Chest X-rays and CT scans have been shown to offer more accurate estimations of tracheobronchial dimensions, while ultrasound has been identified as a promising bedside tool. Recent meta-analytic evidence and technological advancements, including 3D reconstruction and AI-based modelling, may support a more personalised and safer approach. It is recommended that a pragmatic, image-guided strategy be employed to minimise airway trauma, improve lung isolation, and optimise patient outcomes.

决定如何选择正确的双腔管:方法和证据的叙述性回顾。
选择合适大小的双腔管(DLT)是胸麻醉的一个关键但往往被低估的方面。本文评估了用于确定DLT大小的传统方法和新兴方法,包括人体测量公式、胸部x光、CT扫描和超声检查。尽管基于身高和性别的预测普遍存在,但越来越多的证据强调它们与气道解剖结构的有限相关性。胸部x光片和CT扫描已被证明可以提供更准确的气管支气管尺寸估计,而超声波已被确定为一种有前途的床边工具。最近的元分析证据和技术进步,包括3D重建和基于人工智能的建模,可能会支持更个性化和更安全的方法。建议采用一种实用的、图像引导的策略来减少气道损伤,改善肺隔离,优化患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信