ASSESSMENT OF ISOMETRIC AND ISOKINETIC ANKLE STRENGTH MEASURES: A PILOT STUDY.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-10-13 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220253302e288925
Carolina Lins, Andreza Ribeiro Batista DE Oliveira, Marina Squarizi Simões Chagas, Felippe Ribeiro, Alberto Cliquet, Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF ISOMETRIC AND ISOKINETIC ANKLE STRENGTH MEASURES: A PILOT STUDY.","authors":"Carolina Lins, Andreza Ribeiro Batista DE Oliveira, Marina Squarizi Simões Chagas, Felippe Ribeiro, Alberto Cliquet, Rodrigo Gonçalves Pagnano","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220253302e288925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate isometric and isokinetic ankle strength in of dorsiflexion (DF), plantar flexion (PF), inversion (INV), and eversion (EVE) in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with individuals aged 18 to 60 years, of both sexes. The Lafayette® isometric manual dynamometer was used to evaluate isometric strength, the Humac Norm® isokinetic dynamometer to evaluate isokinetic strength, and the IPAQ questionnaire (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) for the level of physical activity. Statistical analysis compared sex, dominance, and physical activity level with isometric and isokinetic strengths using the Spearman coefficient and the Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a difference between genders for dominant and non-dominant limbs in isokinetic strength and not in isometric strength. There was a difference between isokinetic strength variables and physical activity levels. The isokinetic strength of dominant PF (p=0.0153), non-dominant (p=0.0287), and non-dominant INV (p=0.0183) demonstrated that very active individuals have a higher torque peak than irregularly active and sedentary individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results demonstrated greater isokinetic strength in men than in women and active individuals compared to sedentary ones. However, it was not possible to establish an association between isometric and isokinetic ankle measurements. Level of Evidence IV, Cross-Sectional Study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 spe2","pages":"e288925"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253302e288925","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate isometric and isokinetic ankle strength in of dorsiflexion (DF), plantar flexion (PF), inversion (INV), and eversion (EVE) in healthy individuals.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with individuals aged 18 to 60 years, of both sexes. The Lafayette® isometric manual dynamometer was used to evaluate isometric strength, the Humac Norm® isokinetic dynamometer to evaluate isokinetic strength, and the IPAQ questionnaire (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) for the level of physical activity. Statistical analysis compared sex, dominance, and physical activity level with isometric and isokinetic strengths using the Spearman coefficient and the Mann-Whitney test.

Results: There was a difference between genders for dominant and non-dominant limbs in isokinetic strength and not in isometric strength. There was a difference between isokinetic strength variables and physical activity levels. The isokinetic strength of dominant PF (p=0.0153), non-dominant (p=0.0287), and non-dominant INV (p=0.0183) demonstrated that very active individuals have a higher torque peak than irregularly active and sedentary individuals.

Conclusion: The results demonstrated greater isokinetic strength in men than in women and active individuals compared to sedentary ones. However, it was not possible to establish an association between isometric and isokinetic ankle measurements. Level of Evidence IV, Cross-Sectional Study.

评估等长和等速踝关节力量测量:一项初步研究。
目的:评价健康人群背屈(DF)、足底屈(PF)、内翻(INV)和外翻(EVE)的等长和等速踝关节力量。方法:对年龄在18 - 60岁的男女进行横断面研究。采用拉斐特(Lafayette)等速手动测力仪评估等速强度,采用Humac Norm®等速测力仪评估等速强度,采用IPAQ问卷(国际体力活动问卷)评估体力活动水平。统计分析使用Spearman系数和Mann-Whitney检验比较性别、优势和体力活动水平与等长和等速力量。结果:优势肢体和非优势肢体在等速力量上存在性别差异,而在等速力量上无性别差异。等速力量变量和体力活动水平之间存在差异。显性PF (p=0.0153)、非显性INV (p=0.0287)和非显性INV (p=0.0183)的等速强度表明,非常活跃的个体比不规律运动和久坐的个体具有更高的扭矩峰值。结论:结果表明,男性的等速运动强度高于女性,活跃的人比久坐的人更强。然而,不可能在等长和等速踝关节测量之间建立联系。证据水平IV,横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信