Rural-Urban Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Emergency Departments in Canada.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mohammed Shurrab, Andrew C T Ha, Jason G Andrade, Christopher C Cheung, Guy Amit, Allan Skanes, Girish M Nair, Feng Qiu, Olivia Haldenby, Paul Angaran, Damian P Redfearn, Ratika Parkash, Jeff S Healey, Dennis T Ko
{"title":"Rural-Urban Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation in Emergency Departments in Canada.","authors":"Mohammed Shurrab, Andrew C T Ha, Jason G Andrade, Christopher C Cheung, Guy Amit, Allan Skanes, Girish M Nair, Feng Qiu, Olivia Haldenby, Paul Angaran, Damian P Redfearn, Ratika Parkash, Jeff S Healey, Dennis T Ko","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In a universal health care system, geographic disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes remain poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate rural-urban differences in clinical outcomes among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with AF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of all adults (aged ≥18 years) presenting to an ED in Ontario, Canada, with a primary diagnosis of AF between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2022. Rural residence was defined as living in a community with a population of ≤10 000. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or hospital admission within 1 year; secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause ED visits. Comparisons were adjusted for demographics and baseline comorbidities using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox regression was used for end points that included death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 104 195 eligible patients, 16 860 (16.2%) resided in rural communities. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced (standardized differences <0.1) as the mean age was 69.4 years in rural and urban groups; 47.2% were women in the rural group versus 47.1% in the urban group. Within 1 year, patients with AF presenting to the ED in rural Ontario had higher rate of all-cause mortality or admission compared with the urban group (34.6% versus 33.5%; hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]), driven primarily by increased hospital admission rates (31.3% versus 29.7%; hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.09]). ED visit rates were higher in rural patients (63.8% versus 55.3%; hazard ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.25-1.30]), while mortality was similar (9.8% versus 9.9%; hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.04]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite universal health care coverage, rural-urban disparities in AF outcomes persist. Rural patients with AF had higher acute care utilization compared with urban patients. System interventions are needed to address inequities for rural populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"e012366"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012366","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In a universal health care system, geographic disparities in atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes remain poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate rural-urban differences in clinical outcomes among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with AF.

Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of all adults (aged ≥18 years) presenting to an ED in Ontario, Canada, with a primary diagnosis of AF between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2022. Rural residence was defined as living in a community with a population of ≤10 000. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or hospital admission within 1 year; secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome and all-cause ED visits. Comparisons were adjusted for demographics and baseline comorbidities using inverse probability of treatment weighting. Cox regression was used for end points that included death.

Results: Among 104 195 eligible patients, 16 860 (16.2%) resided in rural communities. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, baseline characteristics were well balanced (standardized differences <0.1) as the mean age was 69.4 years in rural and urban groups; 47.2% were women in the rural group versus 47.1% in the urban group. Within 1 year, patients with AF presenting to the ED in rural Ontario had higher rate of all-cause mortality or admission compared with the urban group (34.6% versus 33.5%; hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]), driven primarily by increased hospital admission rates (31.3% versus 29.7%; hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.09]). ED visit rates were higher in rural patients (63.8% versus 55.3%; hazard ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.25-1.30]), while mortality was similar (9.8% versus 9.9%; hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.95-1.04]).

Conclusions: Despite universal health care coverage, rural-urban disparities in AF outcomes persist. Rural patients with AF had higher acute care utilization compared with urban patients. System interventions are needed to address inequities for rural populations.

加拿大急诊科房颤管理和结果的城乡差异
背景:在全民医疗保健系统中,房颤(AF)结果的地理差异仍然知之甚少。本研究旨在评估城乡急诊科(ED) AF患者临床结局的差异。方法:我们对2012年4月1日至2022年3月31日期间在加拿大安大略省急诊科就诊的所有成人(年龄≥18岁)进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。农村居住定义为居住在人口≤1万人的社区。主要终点是1年内全因死亡率或住院率的综合指标;次要结果包括主要结果的各个组成部分和全因急诊科就诊。使用治疗加权逆概率调整人口统计学和基线合并症的比较。Cox回归用于包括死亡在内的终点。结果:104 195例符合条件的患者中,有16 860例(16.2%)居住在农村社区。在治疗加权逆概率后,基线特征得到了很好的平衡(标准化差异)。结论:尽管全民医疗保健覆盖,城乡间房颤结局的差异仍然存在。农村房颤患者的急性护理利用率高于城市患者。需要采取系统干预措施来解决农村人口的不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信