Proposed Guidelines for Reporting Parameters and Procedures of High- and Low-Level Laser Therapy in Medical Research Articles.

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-10-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S551850
Kawthar Shurrab
{"title":"Proposed Guidelines for Reporting Parameters and Procedures of High- and Low-Level Laser Therapy in Medical Research Articles.","authors":"Kawthar Shurrab","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S551850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laser therapy is increasingly used in clinical medicine, ranging from high-level laser therapy (HLLT) to low-level laser therapy (LLLT). This study proposes standardized guidelines for reporting parameters and procedures of HLLT and LLLT in medical research articles, aiming to improve clarity, reproducibility, and scientific rigor in clinical reporting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recommendations are based on insights from peer-reviewed studies that consistently identify gaps in the reporting of laser parameters and procedures. The key parameters include wavelength, power density, energy, energy density, and beam characteristics. Common issues noted are missing data, miscalculated doses, and unverified device specifications. To strengthen these recommendations, selected laser-tissue interactions were modeled using COMSOL Multiphysics. This modeling illustrates how power, spot size, and penetration depth affect treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed substantial inconsistencies in the way laser parameters are reported, often compromising reproducibility and reliability. The proposed framework introduces a structured checklist to support systematic documentation of treatment protocols, covering laser settings, irradiation, and treatment parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adopting these proposed guidelines can enhance the accuracy, transparency, and comparability of laser-based studies, filling a critical gap in current reporting practices and ultimately improving treatment validation and advancing the evidence base for HLLT and LLLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"495-505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S551850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laser therapy is increasingly used in clinical medicine, ranging from high-level laser therapy (HLLT) to low-level laser therapy (LLLT). This study proposes standardized guidelines for reporting parameters and procedures of HLLT and LLLT in medical research articles, aiming to improve clarity, reproducibility, and scientific rigor in clinical reporting.

Methods: The recommendations are based on insights from peer-reviewed studies that consistently identify gaps in the reporting of laser parameters and procedures. The key parameters include wavelength, power density, energy, energy density, and beam characteristics. Common issues noted are missing data, miscalculated doses, and unverified device specifications. To strengthen these recommendations, selected laser-tissue interactions were modeled using COMSOL Multiphysics. This modeling illustrates how power, spot size, and penetration depth affect treatment outcomes.

Results: The analysis revealed substantial inconsistencies in the way laser parameters are reported, often compromising reproducibility and reliability. The proposed framework introduces a structured checklist to support systematic documentation of treatment protocols, covering laser settings, irradiation, and treatment parameters.

Conclusion: Adopting these proposed guidelines can enhance the accuracy, transparency, and comparability of laser-based studies, filling a critical gap in current reporting practices and ultimately improving treatment validation and advancing the evidence base for HLLT and LLLT.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医学研究文章中报告高、低水平激光治疗的参数和程序的建议指南。
目的:激光治疗越来越多地应用于临床医学,从高水平激光治疗(HLLT)到低水平激光治疗(LLLT)。本研究提出了医学研究文章中HLLT和LLLT报告参数和程序的标准化指南,旨在提高临床报告的清晰度、可重复性和科学严谨性。方法:这些建议是基于同行评审研究的见解,这些研究一致地确定了激光参数和程序报告中的差距。关键参数包括波长、功率密度、能量、能量密度和光束特性。注意到的常见问题是数据丢失、剂量计算错误和未经验证的设备规格。为了加强这些建议,使用COMSOL Multiphysics对选定的激光与组织的相互作用进行了建模。该模型说明了功率、光斑大小和穿透深度如何影响治疗结果。结果:分析揭示了激光参数报告方式的实质性不一致,经常损害再现性和可靠性。拟议的框架引入了一个结构化的检查表,以支持治疗方案的系统文档,包括激光设置、照射和治疗参数。结论:采用这些拟议的指南可以提高激光研究的准确性、透明度和可比性,填补当前报告实践中的关键空白,最终改善治疗有效性,推进HLLT和LLLT的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书