"Initial Nonoperative Treatment Choices for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis".

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Drew W Nute, Kavya K Sanghavi, Aviram M Giladi, Kenneth R Means
{"title":"\"Initial Nonoperative Treatment Choices for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis\".","authors":"Drew W Nute, Kavya K Sanghavi, Aviram M Giladi, Kenneth R Means","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated whether baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with initial treatment choice of hand therapy (HT) or corticosteroid injection (CI). We hypothesized patients with worse baseline PROMs would choose CI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have an ongoing prospective study of patients aged 35-85 with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). We track initial treatments and PROMs including visual analog/numerical rating sub-scales (VA/NRS), brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Global Health (GH) modules. Global Mental Health (GMH), Global Physical Health (GPH), and EuroQol are calculated. We retrospectively identified patients from 2019-2022 who initially chose HT or CI. We performed pairwise comparisons of independent variables between HT and CI groups, then exploratory bivariate logistic regression (LR) analyses for independent variables. We then performed more stringent multivariable LR analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 156 patients with 191 thumbs (average age 61 years (SD 9); 77% female). 158 thumbs received initial HT and 33 CI. For exploratory bivariate LR analyses, baseline and activity-related VA/NRS pain and bMHQ scores were worse for patients pursuing CI. Each multivariable LR model demonstrated higher VA/NRS activity-related pain levels and was still independently associated with increased odds of choosing CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjusting for covariates, baseline activity-related pain was associated with increased odds for choosing CI. Other baseline PROMs/demographics were not associated with initial treatments. Our findings can inform providers, patients, and investigators considering HT and CI, as well as their potential comparative outcomes, for initiating nonoperative thumb CMC OA care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated whether baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with initial treatment choice of hand therapy (HT) or corticosteroid injection (CI). We hypothesized patients with worse baseline PROMs would choose CI.

Methods: We have an ongoing prospective study of patients aged 35-85 with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). We track initial treatments and PROMs including visual analog/numerical rating sub-scales (VA/NRS), brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Global Health (GH) modules. Global Mental Health (GMH), Global Physical Health (GPH), and EuroQol are calculated. We retrospectively identified patients from 2019-2022 who initially chose HT or CI. We performed pairwise comparisons of independent variables between HT and CI groups, then exploratory bivariate logistic regression (LR) analyses for independent variables. We then performed more stringent multivariable LR analyses.

Results: We included 156 patients with 191 thumbs (average age 61 years (SD 9); 77% female). 158 thumbs received initial HT and 33 CI. For exploratory bivariate LR analyses, baseline and activity-related VA/NRS pain and bMHQ scores were worse for patients pursuing CI. Each multivariable LR model demonstrated higher VA/NRS activity-related pain levels and was still independently associated with increased odds of choosing CI.

Conclusions: Adjusting for covariates, baseline activity-related pain was associated with increased odds for choosing CI. Other baseline PROMs/demographics were not associated with initial treatments. Our findings can inform providers, patients, and investigators considering HT and CI, as well as their potential comparative outcomes, for initiating nonoperative thumb CMC OA care.

拇指手掌骨关节炎的初步非手术治疗选择。
背景:我们评估了基线患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)是否与初始治疗选择手疗法(HT)或皮质类固醇注射(CI)相关。我们假设基线PROMs较差的患者会选择CI。方法:我们对35-85岁拇指腕掌骨关节炎(CMC)患者进行前瞻性研究。我们跟踪初始治疗和PROMs,包括视觉模拟/数值评分子量表(VA/NRS),简短的密歇根手部问卷(bMHQ)和患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰(PI)和全球健康(GH)模块。计算全球心理健康(GMH)、全球身体健康(GPH)和EuroQol。我们回顾性地确定了2019-2022年最初选择HT或CI的患者。我们对HT组和CI组之间的自变量进行两两比较,然后对自变量进行探索性双变量逻辑回归(LR)分析。然后我们进行了更严格的多变量LR分析。结果:我们纳入156例患者,191个拇指(平均年龄61岁(SD 9);77%的女性)。158只拇指接受初始HT治疗,33只接受CI治疗。对于探索性双变量LR分析,基线和与活动相关的VA/NRS疼痛和bMHQ评分在追求CI的患者中更差。每个多变量LR模型都显示出较高的VA/NRS活动相关疼痛水平,并且仍然与选择CI的几率增加独立相关。结论:调整协变量,基线活动相关疼痛与选择CI的几率增加相关。其他基线PROMs/人口统计学与初始治疗无关。我们的研究结果可以为考虑HT和CI的提供者、患者和研究者提供信息,以及它们潜在的比较结果,以启动非手术拇指CMC OA护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信