Development and validation of a procedure to test perception of speech prosody in listeners with cochlear implants.

IF 2.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Harley J Wheeler, Matthew B Winn
{"title":"Development and validation of a procedure to test perception of speech prosody in listeners with cochlear implants.","authors":"Harley J Wheeler, Matthew B Winn","doi":"10.1121/10.0039570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding vocal prosody is essential to successful communication. However, evaluations of speech recognition have relied heavily on word repetition-type tasks where success does not hinge on prosody perception, or where stimuli do not have enough prosodic variation to even test for this ability. Individuals who use cochlear implants (CIs) are at risk for poorer perception of prosody because of their limited access to pitch perception. This study used a multi-slider visual analog interface to measure perception of contrastive focus prosody in sentence-length stimuli by participants with CIs or with typical hearing (TH). Compared to TH listeners, CI users were more likely to misidentify which word had prosodic focus, as well as having weaker perception of prosodic focus, on average. Whereas TH listeners scaled their perceived strength of prosodic focus based on F0 and vowel intensity features, CI users scaled ratings in accordance with vowel intensity and vowel duration, with no relationship to F0. These results suggest that CI users are at risk of complete misperception of a talker's intended message, even in instances where there was no uncertainty about the words that were spoken.</p>","PeriodicalId":17168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"158 4","pages":"2916-2930"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0039570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding vocal prosody is essential to successful communication. However, evaluations of speech recognition have relied heavily on word repetition-type tasks where success does not hinge on prosody perception, or where stimuli do not have enough prosodic variation to even test for this ability. Individuals who use cochlear implants (CIs) are at risk for poorer perception of prosody because of their limited access to pitch perception. This study used a multi-slider visual analog interface to measure perception of contrastive focus prosody in sentence-length stimuli by participants with CIs or with typical hearing (TH). Compared to TH listeners, CI users were more likely to misidentify which word had prosodic focus, as well as having weaker perception of prosodic focus, on average. Whereas TH listeners scaled their perceived strength of prosodic focus based on F0 and vowel intensity features, CI users scaled ratings in accordance with vowel intensity and vowel duration, with no relationship to F0. These results suggest that CI users are at risk of complete misperception of a talker's intended message, even in instances where there was no uncertainty about the words that were spoken.

人工耳蜗听者语音韵律感知测试程序的开发与验证。
理解声乐韵律是成功沟通的关键。然而,语音识别的评估在很大程度上依赖于单词重复类型的任务,而这些任务的成功并不取决于韵律感知,或者刺激没有足够的韵律变化,甚至无法测试这种能力。使用人工耳蜗(CIs)的个体由于其获得音高感知的机会有限,存在韵律感知能力较差的风险。本研究使用多滑块视觉模拟界面来测量CIs或典型听力(TH)参与者在句子长度刺激下对对比焦点韵律的感知。与听TH的人相比,CI使用者更容易错误地识别出哪个单词有韵律焦点,并且平均而言对韵律焦点的感知较弱。听TH的人根据F0和元音强度特征来衡量他们的韵律注意力感知强度,而听CI的人则根据元音强度和元音持续时间来衡量评分,与F0没有关系。这些结果表明,CI使用者有完全误解谈话者意图信息的风险,即使在对谈话者所说的话没有不确定性的情况下也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
1433
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Since 1929 The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America has been the leading source of theoretical and experimental research results in the broad interdisciplinary study of sound. Subject coverage includes: linear and nonlinear acoustics; aeroacoustics, underwater sound and acoustical oceanography; ultrasonics and quantum acoustics; architectural and structural acoustics and vibration; speech, music and noise; psychology and physiology of hearing; engineering acoustics, transduction; bioacoustics, animal bioacoustics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信