COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Messaging in Emergency Departments: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Melanie F Molina, Stephanie A Eucker, Kristin L Rising, Efrat R Kean, Zubaid Rafique, Heba Mesbah, David V Glidden, Mireya I Arreguin, Christopher Alvarez, Robert M Rodriguez
{"title":"COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Messaging in Emergency Departments: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Melanie F Molina, Stephanie A Eucker, Kristin L Rising, Efrat R Kean, Zubaid Rafique, Heba Mesbah, David V Glidden, Mireya I Arreguin, Christopher Alvarez, Robert M Rodriguez","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Patient uptake of updated COVID-19 vaccines is crucial for reducing severe outcomes, yet national uptake remains low.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if tailored messaging or simple inquiry about vaccine acceptance increases 30-day uptake of updated COVID-19 vaccines among emergency department (ED) patients.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This 3-arm, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted from January 29 to June 18, 2024, enrolled adult ED patients who had not received a COVID-19 vaccine in the prior 6 months across 6 EDs in San Francisco, California; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Houston, Texas; and Durham, North Carolina.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Intervention M involved tailored messaging about updated COVID-19 vaccines and inquiry about vaccine acceptance. Intervention Q involved only inquiry about vaccine acceptance. Usual care (no messaging or vaccine acceptance questions) served as the control.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was updated COVID-19 vaccine receipt within 30 days of the ED visit, assessed via electronic health record review and follow-up telephone calls. Secondary outcomes included vaccine acceptance and vaccination during the ED visit. Outcomes were also compared between study sites that had the updated COVID-19 vaccine available and those that did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 852 participants (median age, 47 years [IQR, 33-63 years]; 464 [54.5%] women), 247 (29.0%) were in the intervention M group, 273 (32.0%) in the intervention Q group, and 332 (39.0%) in the control group. Vaccine uptake at 30 days was not significantly higher in either the intervention M group compared with control (14 participants [5.7%] vs 10 [3.0%]; absolute difference, 2.7 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, -0.8 to 6.3 pp]) or the intervention Q group compared with control (11 [4.0%] vs 10 [3.0%]; absolute difference, 1.0 pp [95% CI, -2.0 to 4.2 pp]). However, at sites where vaccines were available, the intervention M group had higher uptake compared with control (13 of 132 [9.8%] vs 5 of 150 [3.3%]; absolute difference, 6.5 pp [95% CI, 0.5-12.5 pp]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cluster randomized clinical trial of adult ED patients, tailored messaging and simple inquiry alone did not significantly increase 30-day updated COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients. The slight increase in uptake among participants in the EDs that had access to the updated COVID-19 vaccines suggested that vaccine availability was an effect modifier, underscoring the importance of opportunity and convenience in vaccine delivery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06156215.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 10","pages":"e2537655"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.37655","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Patient uptake of updated COVID-19 vaccines is crucial for reducing severe outcomes, yet national uptake remains low.

Objective: To determine if tailored messaging or simple inquiry about vaccine acceptance increases 30-day uptake of updated COVID-19 vaccines among emergency department (ED) patients.

Design, setting, and participants: This 3-arm, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted from January 29 to June 18, 2024, enrolled adult ED patients who had not received a COVID-19 vaccine in the prior 6 months across 6 EDs in San Francisco, California; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Houston, Texas; and Durham, North Carolina.

Interventions: Intervention M involved tailored messaging about updated COVID-19 vaccines and inquiry about vaccine acceptance. Intervention Q involved only inquiry about vaccine acceptance. Usual care (no messaging or vaccine acceptance questions) served as the control.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was updated COVID-19 vaccine receipt within 30 days of the ED visit, assessed via electronic health record review and follow-up telephone calls. Secondary outcomes included vaccine acceptance and vaccination during the ED visit. Outcomes were also compared between study sites that had the updated COVID-19 vaccine available and those that did not.

Results: Of 852 participants (median age, 47 years [IQR, 33-63 years]; 464 [54.5%] women), 247 (29.0%) were in the intervention M group, 273 (32.0%) in the intervention Q group, and 332 (39.0%) in the control group. Vaccine uptake at 30 days was not significantly higher in either the intervention M group compared with control (14 participants [5.7%] vs 10 [3.0%]; absolute difference, 2.7 percentage points [pp] [95% CI, -0.8 to 6.3 pp]) or the intervention Q group compared with control (11 [4.0%] vs 10 [3.0%]; absolute difference, 1.0 pp [95% CI, -2.0 to 4.2 pp]). However, at sites where vaccines were available, the intervention M group had higher uptake compared with control (13 of 132 [9.8%] vs 5 of 150 [3.3%]; absolute difference, 6.5 pp [95% CI, 0.5-12.5 pp]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial of adult ED patients, tailored messaging and simple inquiry alone did not significantly increase 30-day updated COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients. The slight increase in uptake among participants in the EDs that had access to the updated COVID-19 vaccines suggested that vaccine availability was an effect modifier, underscoring the importance of opportunity and convenience in vaccine delivery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06156215.

Abstract Image

急诊部门COVID-19加强疫苗信息传递:一项随机临床试验
重要性:患者接种最新的COVID-19疫苗对于减少严重后果至关重要,但全国接种率仍然很低。目的:确定针对疫苗接受情况的定制短信或简单查询是否能提高急诊科(ED)患者30天内更新的COVID-19疫苗的接种率。设计、环境和参与者:这项三组、集群随机临床试验于2024年1月29日至6月18日进行,纳入了加利福尼亚州旧金山6个急诊科的成年急诊科患者,这些患者在过去6个月内未接种COVID-19疫苗;宾夕法尼亚州费城;得克萨斯州休斯敦的;以及北卡罗来纳州的达勒姆。干预措施:干预措施M涉及定制最新COVID-19疫苗信息和疫苗接受情况查询。干预Q仅涉及疫苗接受情况的询问。常规护理(没有信息传递或疫苗接受问题)作为对照。主要结局和措施:主要结局是在急诊科就诊后30天内更新COVID-19疫苗收据,通过电子健康记录审查和随访电话进行评估。次要结局包括在急诊科就诊期间接受疫苗接种和疫苗接种。还比较了有更新的COVID-19疫苗和没有疫苗的研究地点之间的结果。结果:852例受试者(中位年龄47岁[IQR, 33-63岁],女性464例[54.5%]),干预M组247例(29.0%),干预Q组273例(32.0%),对照组332例(39.0%)。干预M组与对照组相比(14名参与者[5.7%]对10名参与者[3.0%];绝对差异,2.7个百分点[pp] [95% CI, -0.8至6.3 pp])或干预Q组与对照组相比(11名[4.0%]对10名[3.0%];绝对差异,1.0 pp [95% CI, -2.0至4.2 pp]), 30天的疫苗接种率均未显着提高。然而,在可获得疫苗的地点,干预M组与对照组相比有更高的摄取(132人中有13人[9.8%]vs 150人中有5人[3.3%];绝对差异为6.5 pp [95% CI, 0.5-12.5 pp])。结论及相关性:在这项针对成人急症患者的聚类随机临床试验中,单独的定制信息和简单询问并没有显著增加患者30天内更新的COVID-19疫苗的吸收率。在能够获得更新的COVID-19疫苗的急诊室中,参与者的吸收率略有增加,这表明疫苗的可获得性是一个效果调节因素,强调了疫苗交付的机会和便利性的重要性。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06156215。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信