Confirmatory evidence supporting single pivotal trial new drug approvals by the Food and Drug Administration, 2015 through 2023.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Trials Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI:10.1177/17407745251376620
Carla Barile Godoy, Reshma Ramachandran, Pradyumna Sapre, Joseph S Ross
{"title":"Confirmatory evidence supporting single pivotal trial new drug approvals by the Food and Drug Administration, 2015 through 2023.","authors":"Carla Barile Godoy, Reshma Ramachandran, Pradyumna Sapre, Joseph S Ross","doi":"10.1177/17407745251376620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>To secure market authorization, the Food and Drug Administration requires that drug manufacturers demonstrate product safety and efficacy for an indicated use based on two adequate and well-controlled studies, known as pivotal clinical trials. A single pivotal trial may also be sufficient for product approval, however, if safety and efficacy is clearly and convincingly demonstrated, or if accompanied by confirmatory evidence. We examined all original drug and biologic indication approvals by the Food and Drug Administration between 2015 and 2023 to determine what proportion of those approved on the basis of a single pivotal trial were accompanied by confirmatory evidence, the type and strength of this evidence, and whether confirmatory evidence was cited more frequently after December 2019, when the Food and Drug Administration released draft guidance clarifying issues related to confirmatory evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Information was extracted from publicly available Food and Drug Administration documents, and we used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and chi-square tests to compare the frequency with which confirmatory evidence was cited before and after December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the Food and Drug Administration approved 441 original drug and biologic indications between 2015 and 2023; 40 of which were excluded. Of the remaining, 181 (41%) were based on 2 or more pivotal trials, 35 (7.9%) on a single pivotal trial with at least one clinical primary efficacy endpoint without orphan designation, and 185 (42%) on a single pivotal trial. Among the final category of approvals, the Food and Drug Administration explicitly referenced confirmatory evidence for 36 (19.5%) single pivotal trial approvals and implicitly referenced confirmatory evidence for 4 (2.2%) others. These 40 approvals referenced 99 unique sources of confirmatory evidence, most commonly pharmacodynamic/mechanistic (n = 49) and other (n = 32). Reference to confirmatory evidence was greater after the Food and Drug Administration issued clarifying guidance in December 2019 (pre: 7% vs post: 34%; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the rising number of the Food and Drug Administration approvals based on a single pivotal trial, greater clarity on confirmatory evidence standards and communication of its use could be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":10685,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"109-112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17407745251376620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: To secure market authorization, the Food and Drug Administration requires that drug manufacturers demonstrate product safety and efficacy for an indicated use based on two adequate and well-controlled studies, known as pivotal clinical trials. A single pivotal trial may also be sufficient for product approval, however, if safety and efficacy is clearly and convincingly demonstrated, or if accompanied by confirmatory evidence. We examined all original drug and biologic indication approvals by the Food and Drug Administration between 2015 and 2023 to determine what proportion of those approved on the basis of a single pivotal trial were accompanied by confirmatory evidence, the type and strength of this evidence, and whether confirmatory evidence was cited more frequently after December 2019, when the Food and Drug Administration released draft guidance clarifying issues related to confirmatory evidence.

Methods: Information was extracted from publicly available Food and Drug Administration documents, and we used descriptive statistics to characterize the sample and chi-square tests to compare the frequency with which confirmatory evidence was cited before and after December 2019.

Results: Overall, the Food and Drug Administration approved 441 original drug and biologic indications between 2015 and 2023; 40 of which were excluded. Of the remaining, 181 (41%) were based on 2 or more pivotal trials, 35 (7.9%) on a single pivotal trial with at least one clinical primary efficacy endpoint without orphan designation, and 185 (42%) on a single pivotal trial. Among the final category of approvals, the Food and Drug Administration explicitly referenced confirmatory evidence for 36 (19.5%) single pivotal trial approvals and implicitly referenced confirmatory evidence for 4 (2.2%) others. These 40 approvals referenced 99 unique sources of confirmatory evidence, most commonly pharmacodynamic/mechanistic (n = 49) and other (n = 32). Reference to confirmatory evidence was greater after the Food and Drug Administration issued clarifying guidance in December 2019 (pre: 7% vs post: 34%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Given the rising number of the Food and Drug Administration approvals based on a single pivotal trial, greater clarity on confirmatory evidence standards and communication of its use could be considered.

2015年至2023年,美国食品和药物管理局批准单关键试验新药的验证性证据。
背景/目的:为了获得市场授权,美国食品和药物管理局要求药品制造商在两项充分且对照良好的研究(即关键临床试验)的基础上证明产品用于指指用途的安全性和有效性。然而,如果安全性和有效性得到明确和令人信服的证明,或者有确凿的证据,单次关键试验也可能足以获得产品批准。我们审查了2015年至2023年期间美国食品药品监督管理局批准的所有原始药物和生物适应症,以确定在单一关键试验基础上批准的药物中有多少比例伴随证实性证据,这些证据的类型和强度,以及在2019年12月美国食品药品监督管理局发布澄清与证实性证据相关问题的指南草案后,证实性证据是否被更频繁地引用。方法:从公开的美国食品药品监督管理局文件中提取信息,使用描述性统计对样本进行表征,并使用卡方检验比较2019年12月前后证实性证据被引用的频率。总体而言,2015年至2023年间,美国食品药品监督管理局批准了441个原研药物和生物适应症;其中40人被排除在外。其余181例(41%)基于2个或更多关键试验,35例(7.9%)基于至少一个临床主要疗效终点的单一关键试验,无孤儿指定,185例(42%)基于单一关键试验。在最终批准的类别中,美国食品和药物管理局明确引用了36个(19.5%)单关键试验批准的确认证据,隐含引用了4个(2.2%)其他试验批准的确认证据。这40个批准参考了99个独特的确认性证据来源,最常见的是药效学/机械学(n = 49)和其他(n = 32)。在美国食品和药物管理局于2019年12月发布澄清指南后,确认性证据的引用量增加(前:7% vs后:34%;p结论:鉴于美国食品和药物管理局基于单一关键试验批准的数量不断增加,可以考虑更明确确认性证据标准及其使用的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Trials
Clinical Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Trials is dedicated to advancing knowledge on the design and conduct of clinical trials related research methodologies. Covering the design, conduct, analysis, synthesis and evaluation of key methodologies, the journal remains on the cusp of the latest topics, including ethics, regulation and policy impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书