Thomas Masanet, Benoît Audry, Christian Jacquelinet, Pascal Moyal
{"title":"Toward organ shortage resilient allocation policies using real-time queueing models for liver transplantation","authors":"Thomas Masanet, Benoît Audry, Christian Jacquelinet, Pascal Moyal","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2025.07.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We report in this paper on the potential interest of real-time queueing models to optimize organ allocation policies. We especially focus on building organ shortage resilient policies in terms of equity, as we experienced differential impact of the COVID epidemic organ shortage on transplant access, according to the cause of liver failure. Patient’s death on the waiting list or dropout for being too sick, resulting from the absence of a timely available organ, is chosen as the main equity metric. Results obtained with the composite allocation score used in France is challenged against the so-called Early Simulated Deadline First (ESDF) real-time queueing discipline, under increasing levels of organ shortage, by extensive simulations. The ESDF policy is a variant of the well-know Earliest Deadline First (EDF) policy, which was shown as optimal in various contexts in the queueing literature. In the present case, the time to the deadline represents the remaining life duration of patients — which is of course unknown. So we propose to simulate a fictional life-duration, and give priority to the earliest simulated deadline. This leads to a simple and comprehensive representation of the system at hand by a Markov process. Our simulation results clearly show that the ESDF policy allows to maintain equity between indications, conversely to the scoring policy, which was not resilient to increasing levels of organ shortage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55161,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Operational Research","volume":"328 3","pages":"Pages 1054-1067"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221725005557","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We report in this paper on the potential interest of real-time queueing models to optimize organ allocation policies. We especially focus on building organ shortage resilient policies in terms of equity, as we experienced differential impact of the COVID epidemic organ shortage on transplant access, according to the cause of liver failure. Patient’s death on the waiting list or dropout for being too sick, resulting from the absence of a timely available organ, is chosen as the main equity metric. Results obtained with the composite allocation score used in France is challenged against the so-called Early Simulated Deadline First (ESDF) real-time queueing discipline, under increasing levels of organ shortage, by extensive simulations. The ESDF policy is a variant of the well-know Earliest Deadline First (EDF) policy, which was shown as optimal in various contexts in the queueing literature. In the present case, the time to the deadline represents the remaining life duration of patients — which is of course unknown. So we propose to simulate a fictional life-duration, and give priority to the earliest simulated deadline. This leads to a simple and comprehensive representation of the system at hand by a Markov process. Our simulation results clearly show that the ESDF policy allows to maintain equity between indications, conversely to the scoring policy, which was not resilient to increasing levels of organ shortage.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Operational Research (EJOR) publishes high quality, original papers that contribute to the methodology of operational research (OR) and to the practice of decision making.