Intentional replantation of periodontally compromised teeth with concentrated growth factors

IF 1.3 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical Advances in Periodontics Pub Date : 2026-09-24 Epub Date: 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1002/cap.70017
Nabeel Ayappali Kalluvalappil, R. Saravana Kumar, Tamer Hamed Hassan
{"title":"Intentional replantation of periodontally compromised teeth with concentrated growth factors","authors":"Nabeel Ayappali Kalluvalappil,&nbsp;R. Saravana Kumar,&nbsp;Tamer Hamed Hassan","doi":"10.1002/cap.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Intentional replantation (IR) has been described as a potential treatment modality for periodontally compromised anterior teeth deemed hopeless, particularly when combined with regenerative biomaterials such as concentrated growth factor (CGF). However, high-level evidence documenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based outcomes in such cases remains limited. This paper evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of IR using CGF in anterior teeth with advanced periodontal bone loss over a 1-year follow-up period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ten patients with single-rooted anterior teeth exhibiting advanced periodontal disease underwent atraumatic extraction, extraoral debridement, CGF application to both socket and root surface, and immediate replantation followed by semi-rigid splinting for 4 weeks. Clinical parameters (probing depth [PD], mobility, and gingival index), patient-centered outcomes (pain scores and oral health-related quality of life), and CBCT imaging were assessed at baseline and 12 months postoperatively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>All cases showed favorable clinical healing, with significant reductions in mobility and PD. CBCT analysis revealed a mean gain in alveolar bone height of 2.58  ±  0.43 mm from baseline to 12 months. Pain was reduced significantly (mean pain scores (Visual Analog Scale) changed from 6.1 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 0.5). Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) scores improved from 18.9 ± 1.32 to 4.6 ± 0.54. No cases of root resorption or ankylosis were observed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Within the limitations of this case study without controls, IR using CGF was associated with clinically stable outcomes and radiographic evidence of bone fill at 1 year in these selected cases. This approach may be considered a potential alternative to extraction in specific clinical scenarios.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>NCT06893107; US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Key points</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Intentional replantation (deliberate removal of teeth, extraoral treatment, and reinsertion into the same socket) can be considered a conservative approach to preserve anterior teeth with severe periodontal compromise.</li>\n \n <li>The addition of concentrated growth factor during this clinical approach resulted in clinical stability and radiographic bone fill at 12 months.</li>\n \n <li>Controlled long-term studies are needed before clinical adoption, as the findings from the current small case series are descriptive.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain language summary</h3>\n \n <p>Sometimes, badly damaged front teeth are removed because they seem beyond saving. But what if we could carefully take them out, clean them, add natural healing material, and put them back? In this study, 10 patients with severely loose front teeth due to gum disease had their teeth gently extracted and treated with a substance made from their blood called concentrated growth factor (CGF). The teeth were cleaned, coated with CGF, and replanted immediately. After 1 year, these teeth were not only stable and less painful, but x-rays showed new bone growth around them. The average new bone formation around the tooth was approximately 2.6 mm, which is a strong sign of healing. Patients reported much less pain and a better quality of life compared to before the procedure. Importantly, none of the teeth showed signs of fusing to the bone or breaking down. This method, called intentional replantation (IR) with CGF, may give a second chance to teeth that would otherwise be lost—and could reduce the need for implants in some cases.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":"16 3","pages":"513-521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cap.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intentional replantation (IR) has been described as a potential treatment modality for periodontally compromised anterior teeth deemed hopeless, particularly when combined with regenerative biomaterials such as concentrated growth factor (CGF). However, high-level evidence documenting cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based outcomes in such cases remains limited. This paper evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of IR using CGF in anterior teeth with advanced periodontal bone loss over a 1-year follow-up period.

Methods

Ten patients with single-rooted anterior teeth exhibiting advanced periodontal disease underwent atraumatic extraction, extraoral debridement, CGF application to both socket and root surface, and immediate replantation followed by semi-rigid splinting for 4 weeks. Clinical parameters (probing depth [PD], mobility, and gingival index), patient-centered outcomes (pain scores and oral health-related quality of life), and CBCT imaging were assessed at baseline and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

All cases showed favorable clinical healing, with significant reductions in mobility and PD. CBCT analysis revealed a mean gain in alveolar bone height of 2.58  ±  0.43 mm from baseline to 12 months. Pain was reduced significantly (mean pain scores (Visual Analog Scale) changed from 6.1 ± 0.7 to 0.6 ± 0.5). Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) scores improved from 18.9 ± 1.32 to 4.6 ± 0.54. No cases of root resorption or ankylosis were observed.

Conclusion

Within the limitations of this case study without controls, IR using CGF was associated with clinically stable outcomes and radiographic evidence of bone fill at 1 year in these selected cases. This approach may be considered a potential alternative to extraction in specific clinical scenarios.

Trial Registration

NCT06893107; US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry

Key points

  • Intentional replantation (deliberate removal of teeth, extraoral treatment, and reinsertion into the same socket) can be considered a conservative approach to preserve anterior teeth with severe periodontal compromise.
  • The addition of concentrated growth factor during this clinical approach resulted in clinical stability and radiographic bone fill at 12 months.
  • Controlled long-term studies are needed before clinical adoption, as the findings from the current small case series are descriptive.

Plain language summary

Sometimes, badly damaged front teeth are removed because they seem beyond saving. But what if we could carefully take them out, clean them, add natural healing material, and put them back? In this study, 10 patients with severely loose front teeth due to gum disease had their teeth gently extracted and treated with a substance made from their blood called concentrated growth factor (CGF). The teeth were cleaned, coated with CGF, and replanted immediately. After 1 year, these teeth were not only stable and less painful, but x-rays showed new bone growth around them. The average new bone formation around the tooth was approximately 2.6 mm, which is a strong sign of healing. Patients reported much less pain and a better quality of life compared to before the procedure. Importantly, none of the teeth showed signs of fusing to the bone or breaking down. This method, called intentional replantation (IR) with CGF, may give a second chance to teeth that would otherwise be lost—and could reduce the need for implants in some cases.

用浓缩生长因子对牙周受损牙齿进行再植。
背景:有意再植(IR)被认为是治疗牙周受损无望的前牙的一种潜在治疗方式,特别是当与再生生物材料(如浓缩生长因子(CGF))结合使用时。然而,在此类病例中,基于锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)结果的高水平证据仍然有限。本文通过1年的随访,评估了使用CGF治疗晚期牙周骨质流失的前牙的临床和影像学结果。方法:对10例牙周病晚期的单根前牙进行无伤性拔牙、口外清创、牙槽及牙根表面应用CGF、即刻再植、半刚性夹板固定4周。临床参数(探探深度[PD]、活动度和牙龈指数)、以患者为中心的结果(疼痛评分和口腔健康相关生活质量)以及CBCT成像在基线和术后12个月进行评估。结果:所有病例均表现出良好的临床愈合,活动能力和PD显著降低。CBCT分析显示,从基线到12个月,牙槽骨高度平均增加2.58±0.43 mm。疼痛明显减轻(平均疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表)从6.1±0.7变为0.6±0.5)。口腔健康影响量表-14 (OHIP-14)评分由18.9±1.32分提高至4.6±0.54分。无牙根吸收或强直病例。结论:在这个没有对照的病例研究的局限性内,在这些选定的病例中,使用CGF的IR与临床稳定的结果和1年后骨填充的影像学证据相关。在特定的临床情况下,这种方法可能被认为是一种潜在的替代拔牙的方法。试验注册:NCT06893107;美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册中心要点:故意再植(故意拔除牙齿,口外治疗,并重新插入同一牙槽)可以被认为是一种保守的方法来保护牙周严重受损的前牙。在这种临床方法中添加浓缩生长因子导致临床稳定性和12个月时的x线骨填充。在临床采用之前,需要进行对照长期研究,因为目前小病例系列的研究结果是描述性的。简单的语言总结:有时,严重损坏的门牙被拔掉,因为它们似乎无法挽救。但如果我们能小心翼翼地把它们拿出来,清洗干净,添加天然修复材料,然后再放回去呢?在这项研究中,10名因牙龈疾病导致门牙严重松动的患者将他们的牙齿轻轻地拔出来,并用一种由他们的血液制成的物质进行治疗,这种物质被称为浓缩生长因子(CGF)。清洁牙齿,涂上CGF,并立即重新种植。一年后,这些牙齿不仅稳定,疼痛减轻,而且x光显示它们周围长出了新的骨头。牙齿周围平均形成的新骨约为2.6毫米,这是愈合的强烈迹象。与手术前相比,患者报告的疼痛减轻了很多,生活质量也提高了。重要的是,没有一颗牙齿显示出与骨头融合或断裂的迹象。这种方法被称为CGF的有意再植(IR),它可以给原本会丢失的牙齿提供第二次机会,并且在某些情况下可以减少对种植体的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书