Comparative analysis of sporadic, IBD-associated, early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251379961
Giacomo Fuschillo, Olga Maria Nardone, Giulio Calabrese, Marc Martí-Gallostra, Francesco Selvaggi, Eloy Espín-Basany, Gianluca Pellino, Jose Perea
{"title":"Comparative analysis of sporadic, IBD-associated, early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Giacomo Fuschillo, Olga Maria Nardone, Giulio Calabrese, Marc Martí-Gallostra, Francesco Selvaggi, Eloy Espín-Basany, Gianluca Pellino, Jose Perea","doi":"10.1177/17562848251379961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a multifaceted disease with variations in aetiology, clinical presentation and prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explores the features and outcomes of sporadic (S-CRC), inflammatory bowel disease-associated CRC (IBD-CRC), early-onset CRC (EO-CRC) and late-onset CRC (LO-CRC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement, comparing S-CRC versus IBD-CRC and EO-CRC versus LO-CRC.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>The literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase databases. The primary endpoint was the overall 5-year survival rate of CRC. Secondary aims included the features of CRC at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty studies and 6,148,851 patients with CRC were included in the analysis. Comparing S-CRC and IBD-CRC, the overall survival was higher in S-CRC (61.88 (range 41.3-78.7) vs 55.54 (51.9-80.9) months). IBD-CRC showed a minor mean age of diagnosis (63.5 (45-78) vs 69.1 ((40-78) years), a minor risk of stage IV (odd ratio (OR) 1.091; 95%CI 1.031-1.155, <i>p</i> = 0.003, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 60.24%), higher risk of mucinous tumour (OR 3.150 95%CI 2.797-3.548, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 96.56%), emergency diagnosis (OR 1.598, 95%CI 1.509-1.693, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 77.40%), and synchronous neoplasia (OR 1.942 95%CI 1.705-2.211, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 0.00%). Comparing EO-CRC and LO-CRC, OS was longer in EO-CRC (79.42 (54-96) vs 77.58 (32-92) months). EO-CRC had a higher risk of being diagnosed at stage IV (OR 1.471, 95%CI 1.456-1.486, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 97.12%), and of having mucinous tumours (OR 1.0142, 95%CI 1.015-1.070, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> 60.48%) versus LO-CRC. Comparing IBD-CRC, EO-CRC and LO-CRC, IBD-CRC had the shortest OS (61.88 months), the highest rate of mucinous cancer (13%) and emergency diagnosis (24%), whereas metastatic disease at diagnosis was more common in EO-CRC (22.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IBD-CRC was associated with a younger mean age at diagnosis, higher risk of mucinous cancers, emergency presentation, and synchronous neoplasia compared to S-CRC. EO-CRC had a higher risk of being diagnosed at stage IV and of mucinous tumours versus LO-CRC. IBD-CRC seemed to have an overall shorter survival rate and a higher prevalence of mucinous cancers, suggesting different pathways of progression and more aggressive features.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospero Registration ID1021182.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251379961"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12515334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251379961","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a multifaceted disease with variations in aetiology, clinical presentation and prognostic factors.

Objectives: This study explores the features and outcomes of sporadic (S-CRC), inflammatory bowel disease-associated CRC (IBD-CRC), early-onset CRC (EO-CRC) and late-onset CRC (LO-CRC).

Design: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement, comparing S-CRC versus IBD-CRC and EO-CRC versus LO-CRC.

Data sources and methods: The literature search was conducted on PubMed and Embase databases. The primary endpoint was the overall 5-year survival rate of CRC. Secondary aims included the features of CRC at diagnosis.

Results: Fifty studies and 6,148,851 patients with CRC were included in the analysis. Comparing S-CRC and IBD-CRC, the overall survival was higher in S-CRC (61.88 (range 41.3-78.7) vs 55.54 (51.9-80.9) months). IBD-CRC showed a minor mean age of diagnosis (63.5 (45-78) vs 69.1 ((40-78) years), a minor risk of stage IV (odd ratio (OR) 1.091; 95%CI 1.031-1.155, p = 0.003, I 2 60.24%), higher risk of mucinous tumour (OR 3.150 95%CI 2.797-3.548, p < 0.001, I 2 96.56%), emergency diagnosis (OR 1.598, 95%CI 1.509-1.693, p < 0.001, I 2 77.40%), and synchronous neoplasia (OR 1.942 95%CI 1.705-2.211, p < 0.001, I 2 0.00%). Comparing EO-CRC and LO-CRC, OS was longer in EO-CRC (79.42 (54-96) vs 77.58 (32-92) months). EO-CRC had a higher risk of being diagnosed at stage IV (OR 1.471, 95%CI 1.456-1.486, p < 0.001, I 2 97.12%), and of having mucinous tumours (OR 1.0142, 95%CI 1.015-1.070, p = 0.002, I 2 60.48%) versus LO-CRC. Comparing IBD-CRC, EO-CRC and LO-CRC, IBD-CRC had the shortest OS (61.88 months), the highest rate of mucinous cancer (13%) and emergency diagnosis (24%), whereas metastatic disease at diagnosis was more common in EO-CRC (22.6%).

Conclusion: IBD-CRC was associated with a younger mean age at diagnosis, higher risk of mucinous cancers, emergency presentation, and synchronous neoplasia compared to S-CRC. EO-CRC had a higher risk of being diagnosed at stage IV and of mucinous tumours versus LO-CRC. IBD-CRC seemed to have an overall shorter survival rate and a higher prevalence of mucinous cancers, suggesting different pathways of progression and more aggressive features.

Trial registration: Prospero Registration ID1021182.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

散发性、ibd相关、早发性和晚发性结直肠癌的比较分析:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是一种多面性疾病,在病因、临床表现和预后因素方面存在差异。目的:本研究探讨散发性(S-CRC)、炎症性肠病相关CRC (IBD-CRC)、早发性CRC (EO-CRC)和晚发性CRC (LO-CRC)的特点和结局。设计:这是一项系统评价和荟萃分析,根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明,比较S-CRC与IBD-CRC, EO-CRC与LO-CRC。数据来源和方法:在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行文献检索。主要终点是CRC的总5年生存率。次要目的包括CRC诊断时的特征。结果:50项研究和6148851例结直肠癌患者被纳入分析。与S-CRC和IBD-CRC相比,S-CRC的总生存期更高(61.88 (41.3-78.7)vs 55.54(51.9-80.9)个月)。IBD-CRC的平均诊断年龄较小(63.5 (45-78)vs 69.1(40-78)岁),IV期风险较小(奇数比(OR) 1.091;95%CI 1.031-1.155, p = 0.003, i2 60.24%)、黏液瘤(OR 3.150 95%CI 2.797-3.548, i2 96.56%)、急诊诊断(OR 1.598, 95%CI 1.509-1.693, i2 77.40%)和同步肿瘤(OR 1.942 95%CI 1.705-2.211, i2 0.00%)的风险较高。与EO-CRC和LO-CRC相比,EO-CRC的OS时间更长(79.42 (54-96)vs 77.58(32-92)个月)。与低- crc相比,eoc - crc在IV期被诊断的风险更高(OR 1.471, 95%CI 1.456-1.486, p 2.97.12%),以及发生黏液性肿瘤的风险更高(OR 1.0142, 95%CI 1.015-1.070, p = 0.002, p 2.60.48%)。与IBD-CRC、EO-CRC和LO-CRC相比,IBD-CRC的生存期最短(61.88个月),粘液癌发生率最高(13%),急诊诊断率最高(24%),而诊断时转移性疾病在EO-CRC中更为常见(22.6%)。结论:与S-CRC相比,IBD-CRC的平均诊断年龄更小,黏液癌、急诊表现和同步瘤变的风险更高。EO-CRC与LO-CRC相比,在IV期被诊断为黏液性肿瘤的风险更高。IBD-CRC总体生存率较短,粘液癌患病率较高,提示不同的进展途径和更具侵袭性的特征。试验注册:普洛斯彼罗注册ID1021182。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信