{"title":"Immunogenicity and safety of DS-5670d, an omicron XBB.1.5-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: A phase 3, randomized, active-controlled study.","authors":"Ami Kawamoto, Masahiro Hashida, Katsuyasu Ishida, Kei Furihata, Aisaku Ota, Kaori Takahashi, Sachiko Sakakibara, Takashi Nakano, Fumihiko Takeshita","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DS-5670d is a monovalent lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. This phase 3 non-inferiority study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of DS-5670d according to participant immune status.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>Participants aged ≥12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. The primary efficacy endpoint was geometric mean titer (GMT) of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) and seroresponse rate at day 29 after study vaccine administration in the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 versus BNT162b2, n = 363). Prespecified non-inferiority margins required that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 0.67 for the GMT ratio and -10% for the difference in seroresponse. The adjusted GMT ratio was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401). Seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2); adjusted difference 4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded the non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent immunogenicity differences according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. The main study limitation was the short duration of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424).</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 10","pages":"e1004499"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: DS-5670d is a monovalent lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. This phase 3 non-inferiority study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of DS-5670d according to participant immune status.
Methods and findings: Participants aged ≥12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. The primary efficacy endpoint was geometric mean titer (GMT) of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) and seroresponse rate at day 29 after study vaccine administration in the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 versus BNT162b2, n = 363). Prespecified non-inferiority margins required that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 0.67 for the GMT ratio and -10% for the difference in seroresponse. The adjusted GMT ratio was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401). Seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2); adjusted difference 4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded the non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent immunogenicity differences according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. The main study limitation was the short duration of follow-up.
Conclusions: A single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424).
期刊介绍:
PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings.
The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination.
PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.