Ashley Hong, Marissa K Shoji, George A Villatoro, Bharanidharan Radha-Saseendrakumar, Sally L Baxter, Peter J Dolman, Michael Kazim, Andrew R Harrison, Mark J Lucarelli, James A Garrity, Dinesh Selva, Lilangi S Ediriwickrema, Catherine Y Liu, Bobby S Korn, Don O Kikkawa
{"title":"Intersurgeon Variability in Proptosis Reduction After Orbital Decompression for Thyroid Eye Disease: A Multicenter Analysis.","authors":"Ashley Hong, Marissa K Shoji, George A Villatoro, Bharanidharan Radha-Saseendrakumar, Sally L Baxter, Peter J Dolman, Michael Kazim, Andrew R Harrison, Mark J Lucarelli, James A Garrity, Dinesh Selva, Lilangi S Ediriwickrema, Catherine Y Liu, Bobby S Korn, Don O Kikkawa","doi":"10.1097/IOP.0000000000003090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assesses intersurgeon variability in proptosis reduction after orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with thyroid eye disease who underwent orbital decompression from 1 of 7 surgeons at 7 different institutions between January 2002 and December 2018. Data were included if a single decompression technique was performed on ≥10 patients by ≥2 surgeons. The primary outcome was postoperative change in proptosis with emphasis on comparison among surgeons utilizing similar surgical techniques. Statistical analysis was performed with χ2 and ANOVA testing, and a multivariable logistic regression model was generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six hundred thirty-three orbits that underwent orbital decompression were included. Five different decompression techniques were analyzed: medial wall (n = 29), fat + lateral wall (n = 113), medial wall + floor (n = 123), fat + lateral wall + medial wall (n = 140), and fat + lateral wall + medial wall + floor (n = 228), without significant difference in proptosis reduction among surgeons. Surgeons did not demonstrate significant differences in outcomes at different time points compared with each other or themselves. Outcomes when comparing endoscopic versus open medial wall decompression varied among surgery types. Multivariate modeling revealed a statistically significant association between postoperative change in proptosis with preoperative proptosis (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative change in proptosis did not differ significantly between surgeons utilizing similar orbital decompression techniques for patients with thyroid eye disease. This study may strengthen the statistical validity of multicenter clinical trials assessing orbital decompression outcomes performed by surgeons employing uniform surgical techniques, thereby advancing our understanding of optimal surgical management strategies for thyroid eye disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19588,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000003090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study assesses intersurgeon variability in proptosis reduction after orbital decompression for thyroid eye disease.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with thyroid eye disease who underwent orbital decompression from 1 of 7 surgeons at 7 different institutions between January 2002 and December 2018. Data were included if a single decompression technique was performed on ≥10 patients by ≥2 surgeons. The primary outcome was postoperative change in proptosis with emphasis on comparison among surgeons utilizing similar surgical techniques. Statistical analysis was performed with χ2 and ANOVA testing, and a multivariable logistic regression model was generated.
Results: Six hundred thirty-three orbits that underwent orbital decompression were included. Five different decompression techniques were analyzed: medial wall (n = 29), fat + lateral wall (n = 113), medial wall + floor (n = 123), fat + lateral wall + medial wall (n = 140), and fat + lateral wall + medial wall + floor (n = 228), without significant difference in proptosis reduction among surgeons. Surgeons did not demonstrate significant differences in outcomes at different time points compared with each other or themselves. Outcomes when comparing endoscopic versus open medial wall decompression varied among surgery types. Multivariate modeling revealed a statistically significant association between postoperative change in proptosis with preoperative proptosis (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Postoperative change in proptosis did not differ significantly between surgeons utilizing similar orbital decompression techniques for patients with thyroid eye disease. This study may strengthen the statistical validity of multicenter clinical trials assessing orbital decompression outcomes performed by surgeons employing uniform surgical techniques, thereby advancing our understanding of optimal surgical management strategies for thyroid eye disease.
期刊介绍：
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery features original articles and reviews on topics such as ptosis, eyelid reconstruction, orbital diagnosis and surgery, lacrimal problems, and eyelid malposition. Update reports on diagnostic techniques, surgical equipment and instrumentation, and medical therapies are included, as well as detailed analyses of recent research findings and their clinical applications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
