Previous Antiplatelet Therapy on Ticagrelor-Aspirin and Clopidogrel-Aspirin Efficacy in Intracranial Artery Stenosis.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Stroke Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-29 DOI:10.5853/jos.2025.00213
Qin Xu, Zongzheng Lyu, Yijun Zhang, Xue Xia, Xue Tian, Xiaoli Zhang, Yongjun Wang, Xia Meng, Anxin Wang
{"title":"Previous Antiplatelet Therapy on Ticagrelor-Aspirin and Clopidogrel-Aspirin Efficacy in Intracranial Artery Stenosis.","authors":"Qin Xu, Zongzheng Lyu, Yijun Zhang, Xue Xia, Xue Tian, Xiaoli Zhang, Yongjun Wang, Xia Meng, Anxin Wang","doi":"10.5853/jos.2025.00213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effects of previous antiplatelet therapy on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin among patients with and without intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) using data from the Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II (CHANCE-2) trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post-hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial, patients who underwent intracranial artery imaging were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 5,920 patients included, the median age was 64.8 years (interquartile range, 57.0-71.4), 2,004 (33.9%) were females, 2,385 (40.3%) had ICAS, and 701 (11.8%) had previous antiplatelet therapy before enrollment. There were significant interaction effects between previous antiplatelet therapy and dual-antiplatelet therapy regimens on the risk of recurrent stroke (P=0.003) in patients without ICAS but not in those with ICAS (P=0.557). Only in patients without ICAS without previous antiplatelet therapy, ticagrelor-aspirin therapy reduced the risk of stroke recurrence compared with clopidogrel-aspirin therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.66, P<0.001). Similar effects were observed for the outcomes of composite vascular events and ischemic stroke at 3 months and 1 year. No significant differences in severe or moderate bleeding were observed between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, those without ICAS and no history of previous antiplatelet therapy may have a better response to ticagrelor-aspirin therapy for reducing new stroke and composite vascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":17135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke","volume":"27 3","pages":"370-380"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2025.00213","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study aims to investigate the effects of previous antiplatelet therapy on the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor-aspirin versus clopidogrel-aspirin among patients with and without intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) using data from the Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel with Aspirin in High-Risk Patients with Acute Nondisabling Cerebrovascular Events-II (CHANCE-2) trial.

Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial, patients who underwent intracranial artery imaging were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were recurrent stroke and severe or moderate bleeding within 90 days.

Results: Among the 5,920 patients included, the median age was 64.8 years (interquartile range, 57.0-71.4), 2,004 (33.9%) were females, 2,385 (40.3%) had ICAS, and 701 (11.8%) had previous antiplatelet therapy before enrollment. There were significant interaction effects between previous antiplatelet therapy and dual-antiplatelet therapy regimens on the risk of recurrent stroke (P=0.003) in patients without ICAS but not in those with ICAS (P=0.557). Only in patients without ICAS without previous antiplatelet therapy, ticagrelor-aspirin therapy reduced the risk of stroke recurrence compared with clopidogrel-aspirin therapy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.66, P<0.001). Similar effects were observed for the outcomes of composite vascular events and ischemic stroke at 3 months and 1 year. No significant differences in severe or moderate bleeding were observed between the groups.

Conclusion: In patients with minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack carrying CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles, those without ICAS and no history of previous antiplatelet therapy may have a better response to ticagrelor-aspirin therapy for reducing new stroke and composite vascular events.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

替格瑞洛-阿司匹林与氯吡格雷-阿司匹林抗血小板治疗颅内动脉狭窄的既往疗效观察。
背景和目的:本研究旨在利用替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者- ii (CHANCE-2)试验的数据,探讨既往抗血小板治疗对有和无颅内动脉狭窄(ICAS)患者使用替格瑞洛-阿司匹林与氯吡格雷-阿司匹林的疗效和安全性的影响。方法:在CHANCE-2试验的事后分析中,纳入了接受颅内动脉成像的患者。主要疗效和安全性指标为90天内卒中复发和重度或中度出血。结果:在纳入的5920例患者中,中位年龄为64.8岁(四分位数范围为57.0 ~ 71.4岁),女性2004例(33.9%),2385例(40.3%)有ICAS, 701例(11.8%)在入组前有抗血小板治疗史。既往抗血小板治疗和双重抗血小板治疗方案对无ICAS患者卒中复发风险的交互作用显著(P=0.003),而对有ICAS患者无交互作用(P=0.557)。仅在无ICAS且既往未接受抗血小板治疗的患者中,替格瑞-阿司匹林治疗比氯吡格雷-阿司匹林治疗可降低卒中复发风险(校正风险比0.47,95%可信区间0.34-0.66,p)。在携带CYP2C19功能缺失等位基因的轻微卒中或高风险短暂性脑缺血发作患者中,无ICAS和既往无抗血小板治疗史的患者对替格瑞洛-阿司匹林治疗减少新发卒中和复合血管事件的反应可能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Stroke
Journal of Stroke CLINICAL NEUROLOGYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISE-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
52
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stroke (JoS) is a peer-reviewed publication that focuses on clinical and basic investigation of cerebral circulation and associated diseases in stroke-related fields. Its aim is to enhance patient management, education, clinical or experimental research, and professionalism. The journal covers various areas of stroke research, including pathophysiology, risk factors, symptomatology, imaging, treatment, and rehabilitation. Basic science research is included when it provides clinically relevant information. The JoS is particularly interested in studies that highlight characteristics of stroke in the Asian population, as they are underrepresented in the literature. The JoS had an impact factor of 8.2 in 2022 and aims to provide high-quality research papers to readers while maintaining a strong reputation. It is published three times a year, on the last day of January, May, and September. The online version of the journal is considered the main version as it includes all available content. Supplementary issues are occasionally published. The journal is indexed in various databases, including SCI(E), Pubmed, PubMed Central, Scopus, KoreaMed, Komci, Synapse, Science Central, Google Scholar, and DOI/Crossref. It is also the official journal of the Korean Stroke Society since 1999, with the abbreviated title J Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书