From image to report: automating lung cancer screening interpretation and reporting with vision-language models.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Tien-Yu Chang, Qinglin Gou, Leyi Zhao, Tiancheng Zhou, Hongyu Chen, Dong Yang, Huiwen Ju, Kaleb E Smith, Chengkun Sun, Jinqian Pan, Yu Huang, Xing He, Xuhong Zhang, Daguang Xu, Jie Xu, Jiang Bian, Aokun Chen
{"title":"From image to report: automating lung cancer screening interpretation and reporting with vision-language models.","authors":"Tien-Yu Chang, Qinglin Gou, Leyi Zhao, Tiancheng Zhou, Hongyu Chen, Dong Yang, Huiwen Ju, Kaleb E Smith, Chengkun Sun, Jinqian Pan, Yu Huang, Xing He, Xuhong Zhang, Daguang Xu, Jie Xu, Jiang Bian, Aokun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps identify lung cancer at an early stage and thus improves overall survival. The growing adoption of LDCT screening has increased radiologists' workload and demands specialized training to accurately interpret LDCT images and report findings. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs) and vision models, could help reduce this burden and improve accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We devised LUMEN (Lung cancer screening with Unified Multimodal Evaluation and Navigation), a multimodal AI framework that mimics the radiologist's workflow by identifying nodules in LDCT images, generating their characteristics, and drafting corresponding radiology reports in accordance with reporting guidelines. LUMEN integrates computer vision, vision-language models (VLMs), and LLMs. To assess our system, we developed a benchmarking framework to evaluate the lung cancer screening reports generated based on the findings and management criteria outlined in the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). It extracts them from radiology reports and measures clinical accuracy-focusing on information that is clinically important for lung cancer screening-independently of report format.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This complement exists LLM/VLM in semantic accuracy metrics and provides a more comprehensive view of system performance. Our lung cancer screening report generation system achieved unparalleled performance compared to contemporary VLM systems, including M3D, CT2Report and MedM3DVLM. Furthermore, compared to standard LLM metrics, the clinical metrics we designed for lung cancer screening more accurately reflect the clinical utility of the generated reports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LUMEN demonstrates the feasibility of generating clinically accurate lung nodule reports from LDCT images through a nodule-centric VQA approach, highlighting the potential of integrating VLMs and LLMs to support radiologists in lung cancer screening workflows. Our findings also underscore the importance of applying clinically meaningful evaluation metrics in developing medical AI systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"104931"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Lung cancer is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) helps identify lung cancer at an early stage and thus improves overall survival. The growing adoption of LDCT screening has increased radiologists' workload and demands specialized training to accurately interpret LDCT images and report findings. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including large language models (LLMs) and vision models, could help reduce this burden and improve accuracy.

Methods: We devised LUMEN (Lung cancer screening with Unified Multimodal Evaluation and Navigation), a multimodal AI framework that mimics the radiologist's workflow by identifying nodules in LDCT images, generating their characteristics, and drafting corresponding radiology reports in accordance with reporting guidelines. LUMEN integrates computer vision, vision-language models (VLMs), and LLMs. To assess our system, we developed a benchmarking framework to evaluate the lung cancer screening reports generated based on the findings and management criteria outlined in the Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). It extracts them from radiology reports and measures clinical accuracy-focusing on information that is clinically important for lung cancer screening-independently of report format.

Results: This complement exists LLM/VLM in semantic accuracy metrics and provides a more comprehensive view of system performance. Our lung cancer screening report generation system achieved unparalleled performance compared to contemporary VLM systems, including M3D, CT2Report and MedM3DVLM. Furthermore, compared to standard LLM metrics, the clinical metrics we designed for lung cancer screening more accurately reflect the clinical utility of the generated reports.

Conclusion: LUMEN demonstrates the feasibility of generating clinically accurate lung nodule reports from LDCT images through a nodule-centric VQA approach, highlighting the potential of integrating VLMs and LLMs to support radiologists in lung cancer screening workflows. Our findings also underscore the importance of applying clinically meaningful evaluation metrics in developing medical AI systems.

从图像到报告:使用视觉语言模型自动化肺癌筛查解释和报告。
目的:肺癌是美国最常见的癌症,也是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。肺癌筛查低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)有助于在早期发现肺癌,从而提高总体生存率。越来越多地采用LDCT筛查增加了放射科医生的工作量,需要专门的培训来准确地解释LDCT图像并报告结果。人工智能(AI)的进步,包括大型语言模型(llm)和视觉模型,可以帮助减轻这种负担并提高准确性。方法:我们设计了LUMEN(肺癌筛查与统一多模式评估和导航),这是一个多模式人工智能框架,通过识别LDCT图像中的结节,生成其特征,并根据报告指南起草相应的放射学报告,模拟放射科医生的工作流程。LUMEN集成了计算机视觉、视觉语言模型(vlm)和llm。为了评估我们的系统,我们制定了一个基准框架来评估基于肺成像报告和数据系统(lung - rads)中概述的发现和管理标准生成的肺癌筛查报告。它从放射学报告中提取数据,并测量临床准确性——专注于对肺癌筛查具有临床重要性的信息——独立于报告格式。结果:语义准确性度量中存在LLM/VLM的补充,并提供了更全面的系统性能视图。我们的肺癌筛查报告生成系统与当代VLM系统(包括M3D, CT2Report和MedM3DVLM)相比具有无与伦比的性能。此外,与标准LLM指标相比,我们为肺癌筛查设计的临床指标更准确地反映了生成报告的临床效用。结论:LUMEN证明了通过以结节为中心的VQA方法从LDCT图像生成临床准确的肺结节报告的可行性,突出了整合vlm和llm以支持放射科医生肺癌筛查工作流程的潜力。我们的研究结果还强调了在开发医疗人工智能系统中应用临床有意义的评估指标的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信