Xiaohui Zhang, Ziyue Qin, Mengxiao Xie, Yuan Mu, Ye Jiang, Hongmei Ding, Ying Chen, Chunlei Zuo, Jing Wei, Ting Wang
{"title":"Towards a global framework of entrustable professional activities for undergraduate clinical laboratory interns: a competency-based approach.","authors":"Xiaohui Zhang, Ziyue Qin, Mengxiao Xie, Yuan Mu, Ye Jiang, Hongmei Ding, Ying Chen, Chunlei Zuo, Jing Wei, Ting Wang","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a core competency-based EPAs framework for undergraduate interns in the clinical laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EPAs framework was developed in three stages: formation of a research team, drafting of an initial EPAs framework, and reviewing EPAs framework. This study employed a literature review and a modified Delphi method to construct EPAs. Furthermore, a preliminary validation of established EPAs framework was conducted among 23 interns and their supervisors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A framework encompassing 10 EPAs was developed, including: occupational exposure and protection, collection of various types of clinical specimens, reception and preprocessing of various types of clinical specimens, basic manual operations for laboratory tests, basic instrument operations for laboratory tests, judgment on the releasability of test reports, notification of critical values, laboratory quality control, interpretation of test reports, communication with clinicians and patients. Experts in the two rounds of Delphi showed high enthusiasm, authority, coordination, and concentration. Scores for each EPA indicator's importance, familiarity, observability, universality, and accuracy were all exceeded 3.5 points, with a coefficient of variation below 0.25. Furthermore, expected confidence levels for each indicator were established at four key internship milestones. In pilot study, significant discrepancy were found between self- and director-assessments across most EPAs (p<0.05), with interns consistently rating themselves higher, particularly in complex tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With its robust validity and systematic structure, this EPAs framework provides a scalable model for assessing clinical laboratory interns. It effectively enhances internship competency and promotes global standardization in clinical laboratory education.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study is to develop a core competency-based EPAs framework for undergraduate interns in the clinical laboratory.
Methods: The EPAs framework was developed in three stages: formation of a research team, drafting of an initial EPAs framework, and reviewing EPAs framework. This study employed a literature review and a modified Delphi method to construct EPAs. Furthermore, a preliminary validation of established EPAs framework was conducted among 23 interns and their supervisors.
Results: A framework encompassing 10 EPAs was developed, including: occupational exposure and protection, collection of various types of clinical specimens, reception and preprocessing of various types of clinical specimens, basic manual operations for laboratory tests, basic instrument operations for laboratory tests, judgment on the releasability of test reports, notification of critical values, laboratory quality control, interpretation of test reports, communication with clinicians and patients. Experts in the two rounds of Delphi showed high enthusiasm, authority, coordination, and concentration. Scores for each EPA indicator's importance, familiarity, observability, universality, and accuracy were all exceeded 3.5 points, with a coefficient of variation below 0.25. Furthermore, expected confidence levels for each indicator were established at four key internship milestones. In pilot study, significant discrepancy were found between self- and director-assessments across most EPAs (p<0.05), with interns consistently rating themselves higher, particularly in complex tasks.
Conclusions: With its robust validity and systematic structure, this EPAs framework provides a scalable model for assessing clinical laboratory interns. It effectively enhances internship competency and promotes global standardization in clinical laboratory education.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!