Towards a global framework of entrustable professional activities for undergraduate clinical laboratory interns: a competency-based approach.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Xiaohui Zhang, Ziyue Qin, Mengxiao Xie, Yuan Mu, Ye Jiang, Hongmei Ding, Ying Chen, Chunlei Zuo, Jing Wei, Ting Wang
{"title":"Towards a global framework of entrustable professional activities for undergraduate clinical laboratory interns: a competency-based approach.","authors":"Xiaohui Zhang, Ziyue Qin, Mengxiao Xie, Yuan Mu, Ye Jiang, Hongmei Ding, Ying Chen, Chunlei Zuo, Jing Wei, Ting Wang","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to develop a core competency-based EPAs framework for undergraduate interns in the clinical laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EPAs framework was developed in three stages: formation of a research team, drafting of an initial EPAs framework, and reviewing EPAs framework. This study employed a literature review and a modified Delphi method to construct EPAs. Furthermore, a preliminary validation of established EPAs framework was conducted among 23 interns and their supervisors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A framework encompassing 10 EPAs was developed, including: occupational exposure and protection, collection of various types of clinical specimens, reception and preprocessing of various types of clinical specimens, basic manual operations for laboratory tests, basic instrument operations for laboratory tests, judgment on the releasability of test reports, notification of critical values, laboratory quality control, interpretation of test reports, communication with clinicians and patients. Experts in the two rounds of Delphi showed high enthusiasm, authority, coordination, and concentration. Scores for each EPA indicator's importance, familiarity, observability, universality, and accuracy were all exceeded 3.5 points, with a coefficient of variation below 0.25. Furthermore, expected confidence levels for each indicator were established at four key internship milestones. In pilot study, significant discrepancy were found between self- and director-assessments across most EPAs (p<0.05), with interns consistently rating themselves higher, particularly in complex tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>With its robust validity and systematic structure, this EPAs framework provides a scalable model for assessing clinical laboratory interns. It effectively enhances internship competency and promotes global standardization in clinical laboratory education.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to develop a core competency-based EPAs framework for undergraduate interns in the clinical laboratory.

Methods: The EPAs framework was developed in three stages: formation of a research team, drafting of an initial EPAs framework, and reviewing EPAs framework. This study employed a literature review and a modified Delphi method to construct EPAs. Furthermore, a preliminary validation of established EPAs framework was conducted among 23 interns and their supervisors.

Results: A framework encompassing 10 EPAs was developed, including: occupational exposure and protection, collection of various types of clinical specimens, reception and preprocessing of various types of clinical specimens, basic manual operations for laboratory tests, basic instrument operations for laboratory tests, judgment on the releasability of test reports, notification of critical values, laboratory quality control, interpretation of test reports, communication with clinicians and patients. Experts in the two rounds of Delphi showed high enthusiasm, authority, coordination, and concentration. Scores for each EPA indicator's importance, familiarity, observability, universality, and accuracy were all exceeded 3.5 points, with a coefficient of variation below 0.25. Furthermore, expected confidence levels for each indicator were established at four key internship milestones. In pilot study, significant discrepancy were found between self- and director-assessments across most EPAs (p<0.05), with interns consistently rating themselves higher, particularly in complex tasks.

Conclusions: With its robust validity and systematic structure, this EPAs framework provides a scalable model for assessing clinical laboratory interns. It effectively enhances internship competency and promotes global standardization in clinical laboratory education.

面向临床实验室本科生实习生可信赖的专业活动的全球框架:基于能力的方法。
目的:本研究的目的是为临床实验室本科生实习生建立一个基于核心能力的环境绩效评估框架。方法:环境保护措施框架的制定分为三个阶段:组建研究小组、起草初步环境保护措施框架和审查环境保护措施框架。本研究采用文献综述法和改进的德尔菲法构建环境影响评价体系。此外,本文还对23名实习生及其主管进行了初步的环境绩效评估框架验证。结果:制定了包含10个环境影响评估的框架,包括:职业暴露与防护、各类临床标本采集、各类临床标本接收与预处理、实验室检测的基本手工操作、实验室检测的基本仪器操作、检测报告可发布性判断、临界值通知、实验室质量控制、检测报告解读、与临床医生及患者的沟通。专家们在两轮德尔菲中表现出高度的热情、权威、协调和专注。EPA各指标的重要性、熟悉度、可观察性、普遍性、准确性得分均超过3.5分,变异系数小于0.25。此外,在四个关键实习阶段确定了每个指标的预期置信水平。在初步研究中,大多数EPAs的自我评估和主任评估之间存在显著差异(结论:该EPAs框架具有强大的有效性和系统的结构,为临床实验室实习生的评估提供了一个可扩展的模型。它有效地提高了实习能力,促进了临床检验教育的全球标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信