Association between socio-economic status and outcomes among critically ill Covid-19 adult patients in France.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Diane Naouri, Naïke Bigé, Tai Pham, Martin Dres, Gaëtan Béduneau, Alain Combes, Antoine Kimmoun, Alain Mercat, Albert Vuagnat, Matthieu Schmidt, Alexandre Demoule, Matthieu Jamme
{"title":"Association between socio-economic status and outcomes among critically ill Covid-19 adult patients in France.","authors":"Diane Naouri, Naïke Bigé, Tai Pham, Martin Dres, Gaëtan Béduneau, Alain Combes, Antoine Kimmoun, Alain Mercat, Albert Vuagnat, Matthieu Schmidt, Alexandre Demoule, Matthieu Jamme","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01590-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Socio-economic inequalities have been identified as a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with Covid-19. In the specific setting of critical care, data are currently more controversial. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of social inequalities on the outcome of patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for Covid-19 through a national French observational study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the French administrative health care database, we identified all adults living in metropolitan France admitted in ICU for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Two covariates were used to measure social vulnerability: an ecological deprivation index, the French deprivation index (Fdep), categorized in quintile (Q5 represented the most deprivated localization), and being a beneficiary of a complementary health coverage for the most deprived (CSS/AME beneficiary status). Primary outcome was in-hospital death. Secondary outcome was need for mechanical ventilation and post-acute care transfer in rehabilitation unit. Fine-Gray survival analysis or logistic regression were used according the competitive risk context. Three sensitivity analyses were performed: (1) restriction to patients admitted after January 1, 2021, adjusting for vaccination status; (2) multilevel logistic regression with a hospital-level random intercept; and (3) sex-stratified analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 120 191 patients admitted to ICU with Covid-19 across metropolitan France. Among them, 29 580 (24.6%) patients lived in the most disadvantage areas and 12 462 (10.4%) were CSS/AME beneficiaries. In multivariate analysis, Fdep and CSS/AME beneficiary status were both associated with higher likelihood of in-hospital death (aSHR = 1,21 ; 95%CI = 1,16 - 1,27 for Fdep-Q5 and aSHR = 1,06 ; 95%CI = 1,01-1,11 for being beneficiary of CSS/AME) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (aSHR = 1,16 ; 95%CI = 1,12 - 1,20 for Fdep-Q5 and aSHR = 1,06 ; 95%CI = 1,02 - 1,09 for being beneficiary of CSS/AME). Among survivors, a post-acute care transfer was negatively associated Fdep-Q5 in patients above 60 years (OR = 0.88; 95%CI = 0.81-0.94), in CSS/AME beneficiaries under 60 years (OR = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.80-0.98) as well as above 60 years (aSHR = 0.81; 95%CI = 0.74-0.88). Results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social vulnerability was associated with higher hospital mortality, higher use of invasive mechanical ventilation and lower post-acute care transfer in rehabilitation unit in patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12521692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01590-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Socio-economic inequalities have been identified as a potential risk factor for adverse outcomes in patients with Covid-19. In the specific setting of critical care, data are currently more controversial. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of social inequalities on the outcome of patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) for Covid-19 through a national French observational study.

Methods: Based on the French administrative health care database, we identified all adults living in metropolitan France admitted in ICU for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Two covariates were used to measure social vulnerability: an ecological deprivation index, the French deprivation index (Fdep), categorized in quintile (Q5 represented the most deprivated localization), and being a beneficiary of a complementary health coverage for the most deprived (CSS/AME beneficiary status). Primary outcome was in-hospital death. Secondary outcome was need for mechanical ventilation and post-acute care transfer in rehabilitation unit. Fine-Gray survival analysis or logistic regression were used according the competitive risk context. Three sensitivity analyses were performed: (1) restriction to patients admitted after January 1, 2021, adjusting for vaccination status; (2) multilevel logistic regression with a hospital-level random intercept; and (3) sex-stratified analyses.

Results: There were 120 191 patients admitted to ICU with Covid-19 across metropolitan France. Among them, 29 580 (24.6%) patients lived in the most disadvantage areas and 12 462 (10.4%) were CSS/AME beneficiaries. In multivariate analysis, Fdep and CSS/AME beneficiary status were both associated with higher likelihood of in-hospital death (aSHR = 1,21 ; 95%CI = 1,16 - 1,27 for Fdep-Q5 and aSHR = 1,06 ; 95%CI = 1,01-1,11 for being beneficiary of CSS/AME) and need for invasive mechanical ventilation (aSHR = 1,16 ; 95%CI = 1,12 - 1,20 for Fdep-Q5 and aSHR = 1,06 ; 95%CI = 1,02 - 1,09 for being beneficiary of CSS/AME). Among survivors, a post-acute care transfer was negatively associated Fdep-Q5 in patients above 60 years (OR = 0.88; 95%CI = 0.81-0.94), in CSS/AME beneficiaries under 60 years (OR = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.80-0.98) as well as above 60 years (aSHR = 0.81; 95%CI = 0.74-0.88). Results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Social vulnerability was associated with higher hospital mortality, higher use of invasive mechanical ventilation and lower post-acute care transfer in rehabilitation unit in patients admitted to the ICU for COVID-19.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

法国新冠肺炎成年危重患者的社会经济地位与结局之间的关系
引言:社会经济不平等已被确定为Covid-19患者不良后果的潜在风险因素。在重症监护的具体设置中,数据目前更具争议性。本研究的目的是通过一项法国全国性观察性研究,评估社会不平等对Covid-19重症监护病房(ICU)患者预后的影响。方法:基于法国行政卫生保健数据库,我们确定了2020年3月1日至2021年12月31日期间居住在法国大都市的所有因COVID-19入住ICU的成年人。使用两个协变量来衡量社会脆弱性:生态剥夺指数,即法国剥夺指数(Fdep),按五分位数分类(Q5代表最贫困的地区),以及作为最贫困人口的补充医疗保险的受益者(CSS/AME受益人地位)。主要结局为院内死亡。次要结果是需要机械通气和急性后护理转至康复病房。根据竞争风险背景采用细灰色生存分析或逻辑回归。进行三项敏感性分析:(1)限制2021年1月1日以后入院的患者,调整疫苗接种状况;(2)具有医院水平随机截距的多水平logistic回归;(3)性别分层分析。结果:法国大城市共收治新冠肺炎患者120191例。其中,29 580例(24.6%)患者生活在最贫困地区,12 462例(10.4%)患者为CSS/AME受益人。在多变量分析中,fdeep和CSS/AME受益状态均与院内死亡的可能性(aSHR = 1,21; fdeep - q5和aSHR = 1,06的95%CI = 1,01-1,11)和有创机械通气需求(aSHR = 1,16; fdeep - q5和aSHR = 1,12 - 1,20的95%CI = 1,06; CSS/AME受益状态的95%CI = 1,02 - 1,09)相关。在幸存者中,60岁以上患者(OR = 0.88; 95%CI = 0.81-0.94)、60岁以下CSS/AME受益人(OR = 0.87; 95%CI = 0.80-0.98)和60岁以上患者(aSHR = 0.81; 95%CI = 0.74-0.88)的急性后护理转移与fdeep - q5呈负相关。所有敏感性分析的结果是一致的。结论:社会脆弱性与COVID-19 ICU住院患者住院死亡率、有创机械通气使用率和康复病房急症后转院率升高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信