Marita Dalvindt, Hannah Lindahl Veungen, Annika M Kisch, Annette Lennerling, Maria Hjorth, Anna Forsberg
{"title":"Fatigue, Sleep Problems, and Self-Efficacy Before and After Heart Transplantation: A 5 Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Marita Dalvindt, Hannah Lindahl Veungen, Annika M Kisch, Annette Lennerling, Maria Hjorth, Anna Forsberg","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fatigue is a troublesome symptom after heart transplantation and is poorly studied in a long-term perspective. One hypothesis is that there is a strong relationship between fatigue, sleep problems, and self-efficacy, and that fatigue decreases self-efficacy. The aim of this study was to explore self-reported fatigue from the time on the waiting list to 5 years after heart transplantation and its association with self-efficacy and sleep problems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter, longitudinal cohort study 48 heart recipients, 12 women and 36 men with a median age of 57 years, were followed from pre-transplant to 5 years post-transplant. Three instruments were used: (1) the transplant-specific Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument (OTSWI), (2) the Swedish version of the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), and (3) the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SES6G).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep problems decreased after transplantation, but after 3-5 years, there were no differences in comparison with pre-transplant. Self-efficacy improved for the whole group from pre-transplant up to 5 years after heart transplantation. General fatigue predicted self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Fatigue plays a pivotal role in self-efficacy after heart transplantation. It reduces self-efficacy due to causing uncertainty and should constitute a primary target for future interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 10","pages":"e70341"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70341","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Fatigue is a troublesome symptom after heart transplantation and is poorly studied in a long-term perspective. One hypothesis is that there is a strong relationship between fatigue, sleep problems, and self-efficacy, and that fatigue decreases self-efficacy. The aim of this study was to explore self-reported fatigue from the time on the waiting list to 5 years after heart transplantation and its association with self-efficacy and sleep problems.
Methods: In this multicenter, longitudinal cohort study 48 heart recipients, 12 women and 36 men with a median age of 57 years, were followed from pre-transplant to 5 years post-transplant. Three instruments were used: (1) the transplant-specific Organ Transplant Symptom and Well-Being Instrument (OTSWI), (2) the Swedish version of the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), and (3) the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale (SES6G).
Results: Sleep problems decreased after transplantation, but after 3-5 years, there were no differences in comparison with pre-transplant. Self-efficacy improved for the whole group from pre-transplant up to 5 years after heart transplantation. General fatigue predicted self-efficacy.
Conclusion: Fatigue plays a pivotal role in self-efficacy after heart transplantation. It reduces self-efficacy due to causing uncertainty and should constitute a primary target for future interventions.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.