Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in France: lessons from the prospective OPALE study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anti-Cancer Drugs Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1097/CAD.0000000000001756
Josephine Papet, Laetitia Augusto-Pelegrin, François Christy, Justine Lequesne, Frederic Di Fiore, Florence Joly, Christian Pfister
{"title":"Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in France: lessons from the prospective OPALE study.","authors":"Josephine Papet, Laetitia Augusto-Pelegrin, François Christy, Justine Lequesne, Frederic Di Fiore, Florence Joly, Christian Pfister","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), several treatments are available, including androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPis) and chemotherapy (CT). There is a lack of real-world prospective data on treatment sequences and survival. The aim of the study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in real-world conditions for patients treated for mCRPC. The OPALE study is a French prospective observational multicentre study. We included between 2018 and 2023, 212 patients undergoing first or second-line treatment for mCRPC. The primary outcome was the median OS, defined as the time between mCRPC diagnosis and death from any cause. The key secondary endpoints included OS according to therapeutic sequences, progression-free survival, response, and toxicities. Survival analysis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Associations between treatments and survival were assessed using Cox models. The 212 patients received first-line treatment (L1), 130 second-line (L2), 85 third-line (L3), and 51 fourth-line (L4). Most patients received ARPis in L1 (85.8%) and then chemotherapy in L2 (56.2%) and L3 (55.3%). The mean duration of follow-up was 31.8 months. Median OS was 46.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9-53.8]. Our data did not significantly demonstrate the superiority of one therapeutic sequence over the others. Limitations are the observational design and the lack of statistical power. The OPALE study provided valuable data on the real-life management of mCRPC, contributing to a better understanding of current practice. We did not identify any optimal regimen, reflecting the evolution of knowledge and recent recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":"36 10","pages":"805-811"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001756","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), several treatments are available, including androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPis) and chemotherapy (CT). There is a lack of real-world prospective data on treatment sequences and survival. The aim of the study was to evaluate overall survival (OS) in real-world conditions for patients treated for mCRPC. The OPALE study is a French prospective observational multicentre study. We included between 2018 and 2023, 212 patients undergoing first or second-line treatment for mCRPC. The primary outcome was the median OS, defined as the time between mCRPC diagnosis and death from any cause. The key secondary endpoints included OS according to therapeutic sequences, progression-free survival, response, and toxicities. Survival analysis was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Associations between treatments and survival were assessed using Cox models. The 212 patients received first-line treatment (L1), 130 second-line (L2), 85 third-line (L3), and 51 fourth-line (L4). Most patients received ARPis in L1 (85.8%) and then chemotherapy in L2 (56.2%) and L3 (55.3%). The mean duration of follow-up was 31.8 months. Median OS was 46.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 35.9-53.8]. Our data did not significantly demonstrate the superiority of one therapeutic sequence over the others. Limitations are the observational design and the lack of statistical power. The OPALE study provided valuable data on the real-life management of mCRPC, contributing to a better understanding of current practice. We did not identify any optimal regimen, reflecting the evolution of knowledge and recent recommendations.

法国转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的真实世界治疗模式和生存结果:来自前瞻性OPALE研究的经验教训
在转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)中,有几种治疗方法可用,包括雄激素受体途径抑制剂(ARPis)和化疗(CT)。缺乏关于治疗顺序和生存的现实世界前瞻性数据。该研究的目的是评估mCRPC治疗患者在现实条件下的总生存期(OS)。OPALE研究是法国的一项前瞻性观察性多中心研究。我们在2018年至2023年间纳入了212例接受一线或二线治疗的mCRPC患者。主要终点是中位OS,定义为从mCRPC诊断到任何原因死亡之间的时间。主要次要终点包括根据治疗顺序的OS、无进展生存期、反应和毒性。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier法估计,比较采用log-rank检验。使用Cox模型评估治疗与生存之间的关系。212例患者接受一线治疗(L1), 130例二线治疗(L2), 85例三线治疗(L3), 51例四线治疗(L4)。大多数患者在L1(85.8%)接受ARPis治疗,然后在L2(56.2%)和L3(55.3%)接受化疗。平均随访时间为31.8个月。中位OS为46.4个月[95%可信区间(CI): 35.9-53.8]。我们的数据并没有显著地证明一个治疗序列优于其他治疗序列。局限性在于观察设计和缺乏统计能力。OPALE研究为mCRPC的实际管理提供了有价值的数据,有助于更好地理解当前的实践。我们没有确定任何最佳方案,反映了知识的发展和最近的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anti-Cancer Drugs
Anti-Cancer Drugs 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信