Effectiveness and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1
Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.1159/000548568
Panagiotis G Doukas, Sotirios G Doukas, Arkady Broder
{"title":"Effectiveness and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Ulcerative Colitis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Panagiotis G Doukas, Sotirios G Doukas, Arkady Broder","doi":"10.1159/000548568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advances in pharmaceuticals, managing ulcerative colitis (UC) remains challenging. Interest in fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for UC is growing, but varying formulations and endpoints in trials complicate safety and efficacy assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis offer a validated, up-to-date overview of FMT's efficacy and safety in UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched four electronic databases and analyzed only randomized clinical trials that investigated the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of FMT in UC, regardless of administration route or dose. Clinical and endoscopic remission was assessed by comparing the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 6,737 studies with 15 meeting inclusion criteria after duplicate removal and screening. The meta-analysis showed clinical remission in 62% receiving FMT vs. 50.5% in controls (OR 2.65; 1.76, 4.00). The endoscopic response was 42% in the FMT group vs. 22% in controls (OR 2.00; 1.09; 3.68). Heterogeneity was assessed as low (by I2 index and τ2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data show that FMT significantly improves clinical and endoscopic remission rates, offering a promising nonpharmacological option for UC patients unresponsive to conventional treatments. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize the formulation, dosing, while also address the safety profile of FMT in UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":520605,"journal":{"name":"Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"85-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite advances in pharmaceuticals, managing ulcerative colitis (UC) remains challenging. Interest in fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for UC is growing, but varying formulations and endpoints in trials complicate safety and efficacy assessment. This systematic review and meta-analysis offer a validated, up-to-date overview of FMT's efficacy and safety in UC.

Methods: We searched four electronic databases and analyzed only randomized clinical trials that investigated the clinical and endoscopic efficacy of FMT in UC, regardless of administration route or dose. Clinical and endoscopic remission was assessed by comparing the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval.

Results: The initial search yielded 6,737 studies with 15 meeting inclusion criteria after duplicate removal and screening. The meta-analysis showed clinical remission in 62% receiving FMT vs. 50.5% in controls (OR 2.65; 1.76, 4.00). The endoscopic response was 42% in the FMT group vs. 22% in controls (OR 2.00; 1.09; 3.68). Heterogeneity was assessed as low (by I2 index and τ2).

Conclusion: Our data show that FMT significantly improves clinical and endoscopic remission rates, offering a promising nonpharmacological option for UC patients unresponsive to conventional treatments. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize the formulation, dosing, while also address the safety profile of FMT in UC.

粪便菌群移植治疗溃疡性结肠炎的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析。
尽管药物取得了进步,但溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的治疗仍然具有挑战性。对粪便微生物群移植治疗UC的兴趣正在增长,但不同的配方和试验终点使安全性和有效性评估复杂化。本系统综述和荟萃分析为FMT治疗UC的有效性和安全性提供了一个经过验证的最新综述。我们检索了四个电子数据库,只分析了随机临床试验(RCT),这些试验研究了FMT在UC中的临床和内镜疗效,无论给药途径或剂量如何。通过比较优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)来评估临床和内镜缓解。最初的检索结果为6737项研究,其中15项在重复删除和筛选后符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,接受FMT治疗的临床缓解率为62%,对照组为50.5% (OR为2.65;[1.76;4.00])。FMT组的内镜下反应为42%,对照组为22% (OR 2.00;[1.09; 3.68])。异质性评价为低(通过I2指数和τ2)。我们的数据显示,FMT显著提高了临床和内镜下缓解率,为UC患者提供了一个有希望的非药物治疗选择。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来优化配方和剂量,同时解决FMT在UC中的安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书