Influenza Vaccination Rates, Perceptions, and Vaccine Hesitancy in K-12 Teachers and Staff.

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i1.6302
Kevin Cleveland, Kathy Eroschenko, Dalys Davenport, Elaine Nguyen
{"title":"Influenza Vaccination Rates, Perceptions, and Vaccine Hesitancy in K-12 Teachers and Staff.","authors":"Kevin Cleveland, Kathy Eroschenko, Dalys Davenport, Elaine Nguyen","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i1.6302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>BACKGROUND:</i> Vaccination misinformation can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and decreased vaccination. Previous influenza immunization events at various K-12 schools carried out by Idaho State University L.S. Skaggs College of Pharmacy have noticed a small turn out of teachers and staff getting immunized during these events. Given the prominent role that teachers/staff serve in communities, we surveyed K-12 teachers and staff to determine their perceptions, knowledge, and reasons surrounding vaccine hesitancy. Our survey focused on the influenza vaccine, but also inquired about vaccine knowledge in general. <i>METHODS:</i> A Qualtrics survey was distributed online throughout the West Ada School District, located in southwestern Idaho. Demographics, receipt of influenza vaccine, vaccination motivation, knowledge and reasons for hesitancy were collected. Surveys were distributed July 2020 and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Response differences between those who most recently received their influenza vaccine and those who did not were also compared using chi-square or Mann-Whitney U tests when appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 503 surveys were completed, with all respondents teaching throughout the K-12 curriculum. A majority of respondents (n=409;81%) received a yearly influenza vaccination. Reasons for vaccination included: avoidance of flu, reduction of spread, and prevention of complications. Reasons against vaccination included: lack of efficacy, side effects, and numerous \"other\" responses. When comparing general influenza vaccine knowledge between those who received their influenza vaccine vs. those that did not, those who had been vaccinated displayed responses that more closely coincided with scientific data. <i>CONCLUSIONS:</i> The majority of surveyed K-12 teachers/staff received their influenza vaccine during the 2019-2020 season. However, ~20% of teachers/staff are still hesitant due to misinformation regarding vaccinations. Resources and partnerships between health organizations and school districts may increase vaccine acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i1.6302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccination misinformation can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and decreased vaccination. Previous influenza immunization events at various K-12 schools carried out by Idaho State University L.S. Skaggs College of Pharmacy have noticed a small turn out of teachers and staff getting immunized during these events. Given the prominent role that teachers/staff serve in communities, we surveyed K-12 teachers and staff to determine their perceptions, knowledge, and reasons surrounding vaccine hesitancy. Our survey focused on the influenza vaccine, but also inquired about vaccine knowledge in general. METHODS: A Qualtrics survey was distributed online throughout the West Ada School District, located in southwestern Idaho. Demographics, receipt of influenza vaccine, vaccination motivation, knowledge and reasons for hesitancy were collected. Surveys were distributed July 2020 and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Response differences between those who most recently received their influenza vaccine and those who did not were also compared using chi-square or Mann-Whitney U tests when appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 503 surveys were completed, with all respondents teaching throughout the K-12 curriculum. A majority of respondents (n=409;81%) received a yearly influenza vaccination. Reasons for vaccination included: avoidance of flu, reduction of spread, and prevention of complications. Reasons against vaccination included: lack of efficacy, side effects, and numerous "other" responses. When comparing general influenza vaccine knowledge between those who received their influenza vaccine vs. those that did not, those who had been vaccinated displayed responses that more closely coincided with scientific data. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surveyed K-12 teachers/staff received their influenza vaccine during the 2019-2020 season. However, ~20% of teachers/staff are still hesitant due to misinformation regarding vaccinations. Resources and partnerships between health organizations and school districts may increase vaccine acceptance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

K-12教师和工作人员的流感疫苗接种率、认知和疫苗犹豫。
背景:疫苗接种错误信息可导致疫苗犹豫和减少疫苗接种。以前爱达荷州立大学斯卡格斯药学院在各个K-12学校开展的流感免疫活动已经注意到,在这些活动中,有一小部分教师和工作人员接种了流感疫苗。鉴于教师/工作人员在社区服务中的突出作用,我们调查了K-12教师和工作人员,以确定他们对疫苗犹豫的看法、知识和原因。我们的调查重点是流感疫苗,但也询问了一般的疫苗知识。方法:在爱达荷州西南部的西艾达学区进行了一项质量调查。收集了人口统计数据、流感疫苗接种情况、接种动机、知识和犹豫的原因。调查于2020年7月分发,并使用描述性统计进行分析。最近接种流感疫苗的人与未接种流感疫苗的人之间的反应差异也在适当时使用卡方检验或Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。结果:总共完成了503份调查,所有受访者都在整个K-12课程中教学。大多数答复者(n=409;81%)每年接种一次流感疫苗。接种疫苗的原因包括:预防流感、减少传播和预防并发症。反对接种疫苗的原因包括:缺乏效力、副作用和许多“其他”反应。当比较接种流感疫苗的人与未接种流感疫苗的人之间的一般流感疫苗知识时,接种疫苗的人表现出的反应与科学数据更接近。结论:大多数受访的K-12教师/工作人员在2019-2020年接种了流感疫苗。然而,由于对疫苗接种的错误信息,约20%的教师/员工仍然犹豫不决。卫生组织和学区之间的资源和伙伴关系可能会提高疫苗的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信