Carla Fernandes, Filipa Andrade Silva, Bárbara Oliveiros, Carla Regina Pinto
{"title":"Auditory impairment in infants with neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Carla Fernandes, Filipa Andrade Silva, Bárbara Oliveiros, Carla Regina Pinto","doi":"10.1159/000548779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rationale and objectives Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) due to perinatal asphyxia (PA) remains a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Despite therapeutic hypothermia (TH), a considerable proportion of survivors experience a wide range of deficits, including auditory impairment (AI), which needs deeper knowledge. This review aims to describe AI outcomes in infants with HIE. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using standard methods outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. A qualitative synthesis of all the included studies and a meta-analysis with seven eligible studies were conducted. Results In the sixteen studies comprised, a mean incidence of 4.54% of AI occurred among participants meeting the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analysis, in subgroup A (healthy newborns vs. newborns with HIE), an OR=10.74 with a 95% CI 2.02-57.16 and a p-value 0.010 was observed, indicating tenfold higher odds of AI in HIE newborns; subgroup B (newborns with HIE who received standard care vs. those who underwent TH) exhibited an OR= 0.77 with a 95% CI 0.35-1.68 and a p-value 0.510, demonstrating that newborns who received TH had a 0.77 fold lower odds of developing AI. Conclusion This review highlights HIE as a risk factor for AI and the possibility of TH being a protective factor. However, the variations in participant characteristics, HIE criteria, and methods of hearing assessment contribute to significant variability between studies, identifying the need for a standard evaluation of auditory outcomes in this setting, and extended over long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives Hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) due to perinatal asphyxia (PA) remains a significant cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Despite therapeutic hypothermia (TH), a considerable proportion of survivors experience a wide range of deficits, including auditory impairment (AI), which needs deeper knowledge. This review aims to describe AI outcomes in infants with HIE. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using standard methods outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. A qualitative synthesis of all the included studies and a meta-analysis with seven eligible studies were conducted. Results In the sixteen studies comprised, a mean incidence of 4.54% of AI occurred among participants meeting the inclusion criteria. In the meta-analysis, in subgroup A (healthy newborns vs. newborns with HIE), an OR=10.74 with a 95% CI 2.02-57.16 and a p-value 0.010 was observed, indicating tenfold higher odds of AI in HIE newborns; subgroup B (newborns with HIE who received standard care vs. those who underwent TH) exhibited an OR= 0.77 with a 95% CI 0.35-1.68 and a p-value 0.510, demonstrating that newborns who received TH had a 0.77 fold lower odds of developing AI. Conclusion This review highlights HIE as a risk factor for AI and the possibility of TH being a protective factor. However, the variations in participant characteristics, HIE criteria, and methods of hearing assessment contribute to significant variability between studies, identifying the need for a standard evaluation of auditory outcomes in this setting, and extended over long-term.