Early Electroencephalography and Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography for the Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Neonates with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis.

IF 3
Neonatology Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI:10.1159/000548737
Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Prathik Bandiya, Tapas Bandyopadhyay, Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Arun Prasath, Daniele Trevisanuto
{"title":"Early Electroencephalography and Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography for the Prediction of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Neonates with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis.","authors":"Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Prathik Bandiya, Tapas Bandyopadhyay, Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Arun Prasath, Daniele Trevisanuto","doi":"10.1159/000548737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Electroencephalography (EEG), including both conventional EEG (cEEG) and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), are early prognostic tools utilized in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). However, the reported predictive accuracy of EEG varies widely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EEG in predicting neurodevelopment impairment (NDI) among neonates > 35 weeks with any stage HIE. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched from inception until 24th December 2024. Observational studies evaluating EEG performed in the first 72 hours of life in neonates with HIE, and reporting NDI outcomes assessed after 12 months were included. Two authors independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used for diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (CoE) with GRADE. NDI, defined as cognitive/motor scores <1 SD below the mean or presence of motor disability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62 studies (n=3929) were included. In neonates who underwent therapeutic hypothermia (TH) (34 studies, n=2538), EEG showed a sensitivity of 88.3% (95% Credible Interval(CrI): 83.7%, 92.8%) and specificity of 63.9% (53.6%, 72.8%). In no TH group (33 studies, n= 1,391), the sensitivity was 87.2% (77.5%, 93.5%) and specificity was 76.3% (61.5%, 86.8%). Further, in neonates who received TH (12 studies, n=868), cEEG had an acceptable sensitivity of 84.1% (77.3%, 89.9%) and specificity of 76.7% (66.9%, 84.3%). CoE being predominantly moderate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EEG has good sensitivity in predicting NDI regardless of TH status, and may aid in identifying high-risk neonates for further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Electroencephalography (EEG), including both conventional EEG (cEEG) and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG), are early prognostic tools utilized in neonates with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). However, the reported predictive accuracy of EEG varies widely.

Methods: We evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EEG in predicting neurodevelopment impairment (NDI) among neonates > 35 weeks with any stage HIE. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched from inception until 24th December 2024. Observational studies evaluating EEG performed in the first 72 hours of life in neonates with HIE, and reporting NDI outcomes assessed after 12 months were included. Two authors independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used for diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (CoE) with GRADE. NDI, defined as cognitive/motor scores <1 SD below the mean or presence of motor disability.

Results: 62 studies (n=3929) were included. In neonates who underwent therapeutic hypothermia (TH) (34 studies, n=2538), EEG showed a sensitivity of 88.3% (95% Credible Interval(CrI): 83.7%, 92.8%) and specificity of 63.9% (53.6%, 72.8%). In no TH group (33 studies, n= 1,391), the sensitivity was 87.2% (77.5%, 93.5%) and specificity was 76.3% (61.5%, 86.8%). Further, in neonates who received TH (12 studies, n=868), cEEG had an acceptable sensitivity of 84.1% (77.3%, 89.9%) and specificity of 76.7% (66.9%, 84.3%). CoE being predominantly moderate.

Conclusion: EEG has good sensitivity in predicting NDI regardless of TH status, and may aid in identifying high-risk neonates for further evaluation.

早期脑电图和波幅综合脑电图预测新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病的神经发育结局:系统回顾和诊断测试准确性meta分析
脑电图(EEG),包括常规脑电图(cEEG)和波幅积分脑电图(aEEG),是用于新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)的早期预后工具。然而,报道的脑电图预测准确性差异很大。方法:评价脑电图在预测bb0 ~ 35周新生儿HIE各阶段神经发育障碍(NDI)中的准确性。MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library和Scopus从成立到2024年12月24日进行检索。观察性研究评估HIE新生儿出生后72小时的脑电图,并报告12个月后评估的NDI结果。两位作者独立提取数据。采用贝叶斯随机效应双变量模型进行诊断检验准确性meta分析。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险,使用GRADE评估证据确定性(CoE)。结果:纳入62项研究(n=3929)。在接受治疗性低温(TH)的新生儿中(34项研究,n=2538),脑电图显示敏感性为88.3%(95%可信区间(CrI): 83.7%, 92.8%),特异性为63.9%(53.6%,72.8%)。无TH组(33项研究,n= 1391),敏感性为87.2%(77.5%,93.5%),特异性为76.3%(61.5%,86.8%)。此外,在接受TH治疗的新生儿中(12项研究,n=868), cEEG的可接受敏感性为84.1%(77.3%,89.9%),特异性为76.7%(66.9%,84.3%)。CoE主要是温和的。结论:不论TH状态如何,脑电图预测NDI均有较好的敏感性,有助于识别高危新生儿,进行进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信