Why the Medicare physician fee schedule misvalues fee levels and how to fix it.

IF 2.7
Laura Skopec, Robert A Berenson
{"title":"Why the Medicare physician fee schedule misvalues fee levels and how to fix it.","authors":"Laura Skopec, Robert A Berenson","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on the American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) to estimate the physician work and direct practice expense associated with the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). However, as CMS notes in the 2026 MPFS proposed rule, the RUC's processes, which rely heavily on surveys and expert panels of physicians who are members of specialty societies, create conflicts of interest and overvalue specialty services. Although CMS and the RUC regularly assess MPFS codes for misvaluation, significant distortions remain, in part because the RUC develops new values by simply repeating the survey and expert panel processes that created the misvaluation in the first place. To correct this longstanding program, CMS should implement a technical expert panel to provide unbiased recommendations on the fee schedule, and Congress should require CMS to validate work and direct practice expense values using alternative, empirical data sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 10","pages":"qxaf189"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12508800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on the American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) to estimate the physician work and direct practice expense associated with the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). However, as CMS notes in the 2026 MPFS proposed rule, the RUC's processes, which rely heavily on surveys and expert panels of physicians who are members of specialty societies, create conflicts of interest and overvalue specialty services. Although CMS and the RUC regularly assess MPFS codes for misvaluation, significant distortions remain, in part because the RUC develops new values by simply repeating the survey and expert panel processes that created the misvaluation in the first place. To correct this longstanding program, CMS should implement a technical expert panel to provide unbiased recommendations on the fee schedule, and Congress should require CMS to validate work and direct practice expense values using alternative, empirical data sources.

为什么医疗保险医生收费时间表错误估计费用水平,以及如何解决它。
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)依靠美国医学协会的相对价值量表更新委员会(RUC)来估计与医疗保险医生收费表(MPFS)相关的医生工作和直接执业费用。然而,正如CMS在2026年MPFS提议的规则中指出的那样,RUC的流程严重依赖于调查和专业协会成员的医生专家小组,这会产生利益冲突并高估专业服务。尽管CMS和RUC定期评估MPFS代码的错误估值,但仍然存在严重的扭曲,部分原因是RUC通过简单地重复调查和专家小组过程来开发新的价值,这些过程首先造成了错误的估值。为了纠正这一长期存在的项目,CMS应该实施一个技术专家小组,就收费时间表提供公正的建议,国会应该要求CMS使用替代的经验数据来源验证工作和直接实践费用值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信