Adopting and embedding home sensors in social care: findings from a mixed methods, rapid evaluation.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-10-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.14011.2
Joseph Wherton, Stephanie Stockwell, Nikki Newhouse, Stuart Redding, Anna Louise Todsen, Caroline Potter, Stavros Petrou, Sonja Marjanovic, Sara Shaw
{"title":"Adopting and embedding home sensors in social care: findings from a mixed methods, rapid evaluation.","authors":"Joseph Wherton, Stephanie Stockwell, Nikki Newhouse, Stuart Redding, Anna Louise Todsen, Caroline Potter, Stavros Petrou, Sonja Marjanovic, Sara Shaw","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.14011.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing pressure faced by adult social care in England has fuelled interest in technology-enabled care (TEC). This includes the use of sensor-based technology to monitor activity patterns for 'proactive' interventions and care. However, evidence on its effectiveness and use is limited to feasibility pilots, as opposed to business-as-usual. Working with three local authorities using home sensors, we sought to define good practices and draw transferable lessons on implementing and embedding this technology in routine care practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Across all sites, we interviewed 51 staff and system stakeholders, 19 service users and family/informal caregivers. We also used secondary data to determine the feasibility of a full economic study. The analysis was guided by the NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, and challenges to scale-up, spread and sustainability) framework to explore factors influencing implementation and sustained adoption of the technology in use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Home sensors were used across multiple care contexts (assessment, reablement, and long-term care monitoring). Perceived value and impact included an increase in service user independence and safety, family/informal caregiver reassurance, identifying healthcare needs, providing more holistic and objective assessments, and supporting dialogue regarding care needs. However, evidence of the impact across these areas was limited, and we were unable to obtain the data required to undertake an economic analysis. Key issues to consider for sustained adoption include the materiality and dependability of the technology, compatibility with service users and their care networks, workforce knowledge and confidence, inter-organizational routines and coordination work, and strategic alignment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate the need to acknowledge the labor-intensive process of embedding and adapting the use of home sensors for proactive care. Decision makers need to focus on how to support and resource incremental and system wide-changes, with particular attention paid to ensuring technology dependability, 'wrap around' support, workforce knowledge and skills, co-adaptation of inter-organization routines, cross-stakeholder collaboration, and evaluation capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14011.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing pressure faced by adult social care in England has fuelled interest in technology-enabled care (TEC). This includes the use of sensor-based technology to monitor activity patterns for 'proactive' interventions and care. However, evidence on its effectiveness and use is limited to feasibility pilots, as opposed to business-as-usual. Working with three local authorities using home sensors, we sought to define good practices and draw transferable lessons on implementing and embedding this technology in routine care practice.

Methods: Across all sites, we interviewed 51 staff and system stakeholders, 19 service users and family/informal caregivers. We also used secondary data to determine the feasibility of a full economic study. The analysis was guided by the NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, and challenges to scale-up, spread and sustainability) framework to explore factors influencing implementation and sustained adoption of the technology in use.

Results: Home sensors were used across multiple care contexts (assessment, reablement, and long-term care monitoring). Perceived value and impact included an increase in service user independence and safety, family/informal caregiver reassurance, identifying healthcare needs, providing more holistic and objective assessments, and supporting dialogue regarding care needs. However, evidence of the impact across these areas was limited, and we were unable to obtain the data required to undertake an economic analysis. Key issues to consider for sustained adoption include the materiality and dependability of the technology, compatibility with service users and their care networks, workforce knowledge and confidence, inter-organizational routines and coordination work, and strategic alignment.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate the need to acknowledge the labor-intensive process of embedding and adapting the use of home sensors for proactive care. Decision makers need to focus on how to support and resource incremental and system wide-changes, with particular attention paid to ensuring technology dependability, 'wrap around' support, workforce knowledge and skills, co-adaptation of inter-organization routines, cross-stakeholder collaboration, and evaluation capabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在社会护理中采用和嵌入家庭传感器:混合方法的结果,快速评估。
背景:英国成人社会护理面临的压力越来越大,这激发了人们对技术支持护理(TEC)的兴趣。这包括使用基于传感器的技术来监测活动模式,以进行“主动”干预和护理。然而,关于其有效性和使用的证据仅限于可行性试点,而不是一切照旧。我们与三个使用家庭传感器的地方当局合作,试图确定良好做法,并在日常护理实践中实施和嵌入这项技术,从中吸取可转移的经验教训。方法:在所有站点,我们采访了51名工作人员和系统利益相关者,19名服务用户和家庭/非正式照顾者。我们还使用二手数据来确定全面经济研究的可行性。该分析以NASSS(未采用、放弃以及扩大规模、推广和可持续性的挑战)框架为指导,探索影响正在使用的技术的实施和持续采用的因素。结果:家庭传感器被用于多种护理环境(评估、治疗和长期护理监测)。感知到的价值和影响包括提高服务使用者的独立性和安全性、让家庭/非正式照料者放心、确定保健需求、提供更全面和客观的评估,以及支持关于护理需求的对话。然而,这些地区的影响证据有限,我们无法获得进行经济分析所需的数据。要想持续采用,需要考虑的关键问题包括技术的重要性和可靠性、与服务用户及其护理网络的兼容性、员工的知识和信心、组织间惯例和协调工作以及战略一致性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,需要承认嵌入和适应家庭传感器用于主动护理的劳动密集型过程。决策者需要关注如何支持和资源增量和系统广泛的变化,特别注意确保技术可靠性、“围绕”支持、劳动力知识和技能、组织间惯例的共同适应、跨利益相关者协作和评估能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信