British Dietetic Association Guidelines for the Dietary Management of Chronic Constipation in Adults.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Eirini Dimidi, Alice van der Schoot, Kevin Barrett, Adam D Farmer, Miranda C Lomer, S Mark Scott, Kevin Whelan
{"title":"British Dietetic Association Guidelines for the Dietary Management of Chronic Constipation in Adults.","authors":"Eirini Dimidi, Alice van der Schoot, Kevin Barrett, Adam D Farmer, Miranda C Lomer, S Mark Scott, Kevin Whelan","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current clinical guidelines for chronic constipation offer limited dietary recommendations. The aim of this project was to develop the first comprehensive evidence-based dietary guidelines for the management of chronic constipation in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The findings generated from the meta-analyses were then used to develop guideline statements using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and a Delphi consensus survey among a multi-disciplinary expert Guideline Steering Committee. Recommendation statements were produced for treatment response, stool output, gut symptoms, adverse events, and quality of life, and only based on the findings where ≥ 2 RCTs contributed to the meta-analysis. The strength of recommendation was assessed using the GRADE approach. Consensus voting amongst the Guideline Steering Committee was performed using a modified Delphi survey approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The four systematic reviews included a total of 75 RCTs. Fifty-nine dietary recommendation statements were generated and accepted through the Delphi survey. For dietary supplements, 15 recommendation statements relate to fibre supplements, 20 relate to probiotics, 2 to synbiotics, 5 to magnesium oxide, 2 to senna, and 3 to kiwifruit supplements. For foods, three recommendation statements related to kiwifruits, two to prunes, and two to rye bread. For drinks, five recommendation statements related to high mineral-containing water. No recommendations were made for whole diet approaches due to a lack of evidence. Twelve statements had a very low level of evidence, 39 had a low level of evidence, and 8 had moderate evidence. Twenty-seven statements were strong recommendations, and 32 were qualified recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These are the first comprehensive evidence-based dietary guidelines for the management of constipation based upon a robust systematic review and GRADE processes. Recommendations were made for dietary supplements, foods and drinks that have never been previously included in clinical guidelines, and can now be rapidly implemented into clinical practice, thereby improving clinical care and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":"38 5","pages":"e70133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.70133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current clinical guidelines for chronic constipation offer limited dietary recommendations. The aim of this project was to develop the first comprehensive evidence-based dietary guidelines for the management of chronic constipation in adults.

Methods: Four systematic reviews and meta-analyses were performed to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The findings generated from the meta-analyses were then used to develop guideline statements using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and a Delphi consensus survey among a multi-disciplinary expert Guideline Steering Committee. Recommendation statements were produced for treatment response, stool output, gut symptoms, adverse events, and quality of life, and only based on the findings where ≥ 2 RCTs contributed to the meta-analysis. The strength of recommendation was assessed using the GRADE approach. Consensus voting amongst the Guideline Steering Committee was performed using a modified Delphi survey approach.

Results: The four systematic reviews included a total of 75 RCTs. Fifty-nine dietary recommendation statements were generated and accepted through the Delphi survey. For dietary supplements, 15 recommendation statements relate to fibre supplements, 20 relate to probiotics, 2 to synbiotics, 5 to magnesium oxide, 2 to senna, and 3 to kiwifruit supplements. For foods, three recommendation statements related to kiwifruits, two to prunes, and two to rye bread. For drinks, five recommendation statements related to high mineral-containing water. No recommendations were made for whole diet approaches due to a lack of evidence. Twelve statements had a very low level of evidence, 39 had a low level of evidence, and 8 had moderate evidence. Twenty-seven statements were strong recommendations, and 32 were qualified recommendations.

Conclusions: These are the first comprehensive evidence-based dietary guidelines for the management of constipation based upon a robust systematic review and GRADE processes. Recommendations were made for dietary supplements, foods and drinks that have never been previously included in clinical guidelines, and can now be rapidly implemented into clinical practice, thereby improving clinical care and patient outcomes.

英国饮食协会成人慢性便秘的饮食管理指南。
背景:目前慢性便秘的临床指南提供有限的饮食建议。该项目的目的是为成人慢性便秘的管理制定第一个全面的循证饮食指南。方法:采用四项系统评价和荟萃分析来确定符合条件的随机对照试验(rct)。从荟萃分析中产生的结果随后被用于制定指南声明,使用建议、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法和多学科专家指南指导委员会的德尔菲共识调查。针对治疗反应、粪便排出量、肠道症状、不良事件和生活质量提出了建议声明,并且仅基于≥2个rct参与meta分析的结果。使用GRADE方法评估推荐的强度。指南指导委员会采用改进的德尔菲调查方法进行共识投票。结果:4项系统评价共纳入75项随机对照试验。通过德尔菲调查,产生并接受了59份饮食推荐声明。在膳食补充剂方面,有15条建议与纤维补充剂有关,20条与益生菌有关,2条与合成菌有关,5条与氧化镁有关,2条与番泻叶有关,3条与猕猴桃补充剂有关。在食物方面,有三条关于猕猴桃的建议,两条关于西梅的建议,两条关于黑麦面包的建议。对于饮料,有五条建议与高矿物质含量的水有关。由于缺乏证据,没有对整体饮食方法提出建议。12个陈述证据水平很低,39个证据水平低,8个证据水平中等。27份声明是强烈建议,32份是有条件的建议。结论:这是第一个基于强有力的系统评价和GRADE过程的便秘管理的综合循证饮食指南。对膳食补充剂、食品和饮料提出了建议,这些建议以前从未包括在临床指南中,现在可以迅速实施到临床实践中,从而改善临床护理和患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing papers in applied nutrition and dietetics. Papers are therefore welcomed on: - Clinical nutrition and the practice of therapeutic dietetics - Clinical and professional guidelines - Public health nutrition and nutritional epidemiology - Dietary surveys and dietary assessment methodology - Health promotion and intervention studies and their effectiveness - Obesity, weight control and body composition - Research on psychological determinants of healthy and unhealthy eating behaviour. Focus can for example be on attitudes, brain correlates of food reward processing, social influences, impulsivity, cognitive control, cognitive processes, dieting, psychological treatments. - Appetite, Food intake and nutritional status - Nutrigenomics and molecular nutrition - The journal does not publish animal research The journal is published in an online-only format. No printed issue of this title will be produced but authors will still be able to order offprints of their own articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信