Longitudinal Outcomes for a 10-week Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Julia R Craner, Andrea J Fromson, Kayla B Moore, Eric S Lake, Arianna E A Perra, Teri Holwerda
{"title":"Longitudinal Outcomes for a 10-week Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program.","authors":"Julia R Craner, Andrea J Fromson, Kayla B Moore, Eric S Lake, Arianna E A Perra, Teri Holwerda","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Chronic pain is an important public health problem. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) demonstrate immediate and long-term improvements in pain, functioning, and overall quality of life for individuals with chronic pain. However, data on treatment durability for different program models and patient populations are limited. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term outcomes of a 10-week IPRP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>398 adults with chronic pain were treated at a rehabilitation hospital between February 2019 and May 2021 in an intensive 10-week outpatient interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program consisting of physical therapy, occupational therapy, pain psychology, and medical management. Participants completed measures of pain ratings, pain interference, depressed mood, anxiety, physical functioning and pain catastrophizing at intake, discharge, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 34.7% of participants returned post program surveys at 3 months, 26.9% at 6 months, 17.6% at 9 months, and 15.6% at 12 months. Participants were primarily female (79.1%), White/Caucasian (79.4%) and married (51.5%) with an average age of 49.30±15.29 years. The results demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement across all outcome measures comparing intake to discharge. While there was some deterioration of treatment gains over time, all measures remained improved at all time points compared to intake.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A 10-week IPRP model can improve pain and functioning in a population of participants with heterogenous chronic pain conditions in a community setting, providing durable improvements over time. These results add to the body of literature supporting IPRPs as an effective intervention for chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Chronic pain is an important public health problem. Interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs (IPRPs) demonstrate immediate and long-term improvements in pain, functioning, and overall quality of life for individuals with chronic pain. However, data on treatment durability for different program models and patient populations are limited. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term outcomes of a 10-week IPRP.

Methods: 398 adults with chronic pain were treated at a rehabilitation hospital between February 2019 and May 2021 in an intensive 10-week outpatient interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program consisting of physical therapy, occupational therapy, pain psychology, and medical management. Participants completed measures of pain ratings, pain interference, depressed mood, anxiety, physical functioning and pain catastrophizing at intake, discharge, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months posttreatment.

Results: A total of 34.7% of participants returned post program surveys at 3 months, 26.9% at 6 months, 17.6% at 9 months, and 15.6% at 12 months. Participants were primarily female (79.1%), White/Caucasian (79.4%) and married (51.5%) with an average age of 49.30±15.29 years. The results demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement across all outcome measures comparing intake to discharge. While there was some deterioration of treatment gains over time, all measures remained improved at all time points compared to intake.

Discussion: A 10-week IPRP model can improve pain and functioning in a population of participants with heterogenous chronic pain conditions in a community setting, providing durable improvements over time. These results add to the body of literature supporting IPRPs as an effective intervention for chronic pain.

一个为期10周的跨学科疼痛康复项目的纵向结果。
目的:慢性疼痛是一个重要的公共卫生问题。跨学科疼痛康复计划(IPRPs)证明了慢性疼痛患者在疼痛、功能和整体生活质量方面的即时和长期改善。然而,关于不同项目模式和患者群体的治疗持久性的数据有限。本研究的目的是检查10周IPRP的长期结果。方法:2019年2月至2021年5月期间,398名患有慢性疼痛的成年人在一家康复医院接受了为期10周的强化门诊跨学科疼痛康复计划的治疗,该计划包括物理治疗、职业治疗、疼痛心理学和医疗管理。参与者在入院、出院以及治疗后3、6、9和12个月完成疼痛评分、疼痛干扰、抑郁情绪、焦虑、身体功能和疼痛灾难的测量。结果:总共34.7%的参与者在3个月时返回项目后调查,6个月时26.9%,9个月时17.6%,12个月时15.6%。参与者以女性(79.1%)、白种人(79.4%)、已婚(51.5%)为主,平均年龄49.30±15.29岁。结果显示统计和临床显著改善在所有结果测量比较摄入和排出。虽然随着时间的推移,治疗效果有所恶化,但与摄入相比,所有措施在所有时间点都有所改善。讨论:一个为期10周的IPRP模型可以改善社区中患有异质性慢性疼痛的人群的疼痛和功能,并随着时间的推移提供持久的改善。这些结果增加了支持IPRPs作为慢性疼痛有效干预的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信