Nurses' Perceptions of Comfort, Competence, and Barriers to Informed Consent in Labor and Delivery.

IF 1.5
Alexis Zehler, Caitlin Jeanmougin, Riley Costello
{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions of Comfort, Competence, and Barriers to Informed Consent in Labor and Delivery.","authors":"Alexis Zehler, Caitlin Jeanmougin, Riley Costello","doi":"10.1016/j.nwh.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify barriers to patient inclusion in decision-making regarding obstetric care, as witnessed by registered nurses, with a focus on the provision of informed consent in labor and delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online distribution from September 2023 to March 2024.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>One hundred twenty-five registered nurses with more than 6 months of experience caring for obstetric patients in level I through IV maternal care centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection was completed using a 20-question online survey. Analysis of quantitative data included descriptive and inferential statistics, and analysis of qualitative data included review of all narrative survey responses, grouping by commonality, and identification of categories of concern related to research aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants reported high levels of competence and comfort in providing the patient education necessary to achieve informed consent; however, level of comfort decreased if the education included evidence-based options that go against standard medical advice or provider recommendation. Nearly half of the participants reported experiencing retaliation as a result of providing patient education in efforts to support informed consent, and more than 70% reported witnessing patients be coerced by providers, denied care options, and experience negative care outcomes resulting from insufficient informed consent practices. Eleven categories of concern were identified that represent participants' experiences regarding barriers to patient inclusion in decision-making and insufficient informed consent practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized education and protocols for obtaining informed consent in labor and delivery and advocacy for patient inclusion in decision-making may improve informed consent practices, provision of high-quality care, and perceived patient experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":39985,"journal":{"name":"Nursing for Women''s Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing for Women''s Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2025.05.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify barriers to patient inclusion in decision-making regarding obstetric care, as witnessed by registered nurses, with a focus on the provision of informed consent in labor and delivery.

Design: Descriptive study.

Setting: Online distribution from September 2023 to March 2024.

Participants: One hundred twenty-five registered nurses with more than 6 months of experience caring for obstetric patients in level I through IV maternal care centers in the United States.

Methods: Data collection was completed using a 20-question online survey. Analysis of quantitative data included descriptive and inferential statistics, and analysis of qualitative data included review of all narrative survey responses, grouping by commonality, and identification of categories of concern related to research aims.

Results: Most participants reported high levels of competence and comfort in providing the patient education necessary to achieve informed consent; however, level of comfort decreased if the education included evidence-based options that go against standard medical advice or provider recommendation. Nearly half of the participants reported experiencing retaliation as a result of providing patient education in efforts to support informed consent, and more than 70% reported witnessing patients be coerced by providers, denied care options, and experience negative care outcomes resulting from insufficient informed consent practices. Eleven categories of concern were identified that represent participants' experiences regarding barriers to patient inclusion in decision-making and insufficient informed consent practices.

Conclusion: Standardized education and protocols for obtaining informed consent in labor and delivery and advocacy for patient inclusion in decision-making may improve informed consent practices, provision of high-quality care, and perceived patient experiences.

护士在分娩过程中对舒适、能力和知情同意障碍的认知。
目的:通过注册护士的见证,确定患者参与产科护理决策的障碍,重点是在分娩和分娩过程中提供知情同意。设计:描述性研究。设定:2023年9月至2024年3月在线发行。参与者:125名注册护士,具有6个月以上在美国一级到四级产妇护理中心护理产科患者的经验。方法:采用20个问题的在线调查完成数据收集。定量数据的分析包括描述性和推断性统计,定性数据的分析包括对所有叙述性调查反应的回顾,按共性分组,并确定与研究目标相关的关注类别。结果:大多数参与者报告了在提供必要的患者教育以实现知情同意方面的高水平能力和舒适度;然而,如果教育包含了与标准医疗建议或提供者建议相反的循证选择,则舒适程度降低。近一半的参与者报告说,由于为患者提供支持知情同意的教育而遭受报复,超过70%的参与者报告说,他们目睹了患者被提供者胁迫,拒绝了护理选择,并因知情同意实践不足而经历了负面的护理结果。确定了11种关注类别,代表了参与者在将患者纳入决策和知情同意实践不足方面的障碍方面的经验。结论:在分娩和分娩过程中获得知情同意的标准化教育和协议,以及倡导患者参与决策,可能会改善知情同意实践,提供高质量的护理,并改善患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing for Women''s Health
Nursing for Women''s Health Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing for Women"s Health publishes the most recent and compelling health care information on women"s health, newborn care and professional nursing issues. As a refereed, clinical practice journal, it provides professionals involved in providing optimum nursing care for women and their newborns with health care trends and everyday issues in a concise, practical, and easy-to-read format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信