Bugbears in the Waiting Room: Revisiting Arber and Sawyer's Classic Study of GP Reception Work Using Ethnography in Eight English General Practices.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Catherine Pope, Annelieke Driessen, Abi Eccles, Bella Wheeler, Carol Bryce, Jacob Heath, Chloe Phillips, Toto Gronlund, Helen Atherton
{"title":"Bugbears in the Waiting Room: Revisiting Arber and Sawyer's Classic Study of GP Reception Work Using Ethnography in Eight English General Practices.","authors":"Catherine Pope, Annelieke Driessen, Abi Eccles, Bella Wheeler, Carol Bryce, Jacob Heath, Chloe Phillips, Toto Gronlund, Helen Atherton","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 1985, Arber and Sawyer described the discretionary rationing power of general practice receptionists. Our paper revisits this territory. Much has changed in the intervening decades. Digitalisation has altered reception work. Increasing multimorbidity and rising chronic illness, combined with a dwindling workforce, restricted funding and systemic pressures on public services, have fuelled the 'crisis' in general practice. 'Unacceptable' delays in getting a general practitioner (GP) appointment are seen as evidence of this. Our focused ethnography in eight English NHS general practices highlights important shifts in receptionists' management of GP access. We observed waiting and reception areas, interviewed 70 staff and 74 patients and examined practice documents. Arber and Sawyer's dragon metaphor remains salient, but receptionists have new strategies of bureaucratic distancing and redirection to manage appointment requests. They are gatekeepers still and remain a target for hostility but mitigate this by using these strategies. Patients on a quest to obtain an appointment with a GP may still be thwarted and sometimes meet dragons at the desk, but they may more often find themselves allied with the receptionist. The barrier to getting a GP appointment has become the access system and its discorporate digital forms, rather than the receptionist or the GPs she protects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":"47 8","pages":"e70104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12517117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.70104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 1985, Arber and Sawyer described the discretionary rationing power of general practice receptionists. Our paper revisits this territory. Much has changed in the intervening decades. Digitalisation has altered reception work. Increasing multimorbidity and rising chronic illness, combined with a dwindling workforce, restricted funding and systemic pressures on public services, have fuelled the 'crisis' in general practice. 'Unacceptable' delays in getting a general practitioner (GP) appointment are seen as evidence of this. Our focused ethnography in eight English NHS general practices highlights important shifts in receptionists' management of GP access. We observed waiting and reception areas, interviewed 70 staff and 74 patients and examined practice documents. Arber and Sawyer's dragon metaphor remains salient, but receptionists have new strategies of bureaucratic distancing and redirection to manage appointment requests. They are gatekeepers still and remain a target for hostility but mitigate this by using these strategies. Patients on a quest to obtain an appointment with a GP may still be thwarted and sometimes meet dragons at the desk, but they may more often find themselves allied with the receptionist. The barrier to getting a GP appointment has become the access system and its discorporate digital forms, rather than the receptionist or the GPs she protects.

候诊室里的麻烦:用民族志重新审视阿伯和索耶对全科医生接待工作的经典研究。
1985年,阿伯和索耶描述了全科医生接待员的自由裁量配给权。本文回顾了这一领域。在这期间的几十年里发生了很大的变化。数字化改变了接待工作。多种疾病的增加和慢性病的增加,再加上劳动力的减少、资金的限制和公共服务的系统性压力,加剧了全科医生的“危机”。在获得全科医生(GP)预约时“不可接受”的延迟被视为这一点的证据。我们的重点人种志在八个英国国民健康保险制度的一般做法突出了接待员的GP访问管理的重要转变。我们观察了等候和接待区,采访了70名工作人员和74名患者,并检查了实践文件。阿伯和索耶的龙的比喻仍然突出,但接待员有新的策略,官僚的距离和重定向来管理预约请求。他们仍然是看门人,仍然是敌意的目标,但通过使用这些策略可以减轻这种敌意。寻求与全科医生预约的患者可能仍然会受到阻挠,有时会在办公桌前遇到龙,但他们可能更多地发现自己与接待员结盟。获得全科医生预约的障碍已经变成了访问系统及其分离的数字形式,而不是接待员或她保护的全科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书