Doubly Robust Estimators for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Heteroskedastic Survival Data.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Yuhui Yang, Weiwei Hu, Zhenli Liao, Fangyao Chen
{"title":"Doubly Robust Estimators for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Heteroskedastic Survival Data.","authors":"Yuhui Yang, Weiwei Hu, Zhenli Liao, Fangyao Chen","doi":"10.1002/sim.70301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the increasing interest focus on personalized medicine, a number of advanced statistical methods have been developed for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). However, methods for estimating HTEs in medical applications are limited, as they often involve potentially censored and heteroskedastic survival outcomes. Ignoring censoring and heteroskedasticity may introduce bias into HTEs. Therefore, in this study, we proposed two doubly robust (DR) methods for estimating HTEs based on nonparametric failure time (NFT) Bayesian additive regression trees (BART). Our contributions are as follows: (1) by using NFT BART as the prediction model, we avoid many restrictive assumptions, such as linearity, proportional hazards, and homoscedasticity; (2) we extend the DR-Learner to survival data, allowing it to handle the common issue of censoring and confounding in observational data; (3) we conduct a comprehensive simulation study of the present HTEs estimation strategies using several data generation processes in which we systematically vary the sample size of the training set, treatment-specific propensity score distribution, censoring rate, unbalanced treatment assignment, complexity of the model and bias function, and heteroskedastic or homoscedastic outcome. Through simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the two proposed approaches in estimating HTEs. We also conduct a real data application of individualized hypertension management on observational data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Consequently, the proposed methods could yield robust estimates of HTE in observational survival data.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 23-24","pages":"e70301"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.70301","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given the increasing interest focus on personalized medicine, a number of advanced statistical methods have been developed for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects (HTEs). However, methods for estimating HTEs in medical applications are limited, as they often involve potentially censored and heteroskedastic survival outcomes. Ignoring censoring and heteroskedasticity may introduce bias into HTEs. Therefore, in this study, we proposed two doubly robust (DR) methods for estimating HTEs based on nonparametric failure time (NFT) Bayesian additive regression trees (BART). Our contributions are as follows: (1) by using NFT BART as the prediction model, we avoid many restrictive assumptions, such as linearity, proportional hazards, and homoscedasticity; (2) we extend the DR-Learner to survival data, allowing it to handle the common issue of censoring and confounding in observational data; (3) we conduct a comprehensive simulation study of the present HTEs estimation strategies using several data generation processes in which we systematically vary the sample size of the training set, treatment-specific propensity score distribution, censoring rate, unbalanced treatment assignment, complexity of the model and bias function, and heteroskedastic or homoscedastic outcome. Through simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the two proposed approaches in estimating HTEs. We also conduct a real data application of individualized hypertension management on observational data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Consequently, the proposed methods could yield robust estimates of HTE in observational survival data.

异方差生存数据中异质治疗效果的双稳健估计。
鉴于对个性化医疗的兴趣日益增加,已经开发了许多先进的统计方法来估计异质性治疗效果(HTEs)。然而,估计hte在医疗应用中的方法是有限的,因为它们通常涉及潜在的审查和异方差的生存结果。忽略审查和异方差可能会给HTEs引入偏差。因此,在本研究中,我们提出了两种基于非参数故障时间(NFT)贝叶斯加性回归树(BART)的双鲁棒(DR)方法来估计hte。我们的贡献如下:(1)利用NFT BART作为预测模型,我们避免了许多限制性假设,如线性、比例风险和均方差;(2)我们将DR-Learner扩展到生存数据,使其能够处理观测数据中常见的审查和混淆问题;(3)我们对目前的HTEs估计策略进行了全面的模拟研究,使用了几个数据生成过程,其中我们系统地改变了训练集的样本量、治疗特异性倾向得分分布、审查率、不平衡治疗分配、模型和偏差函数的复杂性以及异方差或均方差结果。通过仿真,我们证明了这两种方法在估计hte方面的有效性和鲁棒性。我们还对国家健康与营养调查(NHANES)的观察数据进行了个体化高血压管理的实际数据应用。因此,所提出的方法可以在观察生存数据中产生可靠的HTE估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信