Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.
Bima J Hasjim, Mitchell Paukner, Allison J Kwong, Mamatha Bhat, Hirohito Ichii, Robert R Redfield, Oliver S Eng, Zeljka Jutric, David K Imagawa, Reed I Ayabe
{"title":"Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.","authors":"Bima J Hasjim, Mitchell Paukner, Allison J Kwong, Mamatha Bhat, Hirohito Ichii, Robert R Redfield, Oliver S Eng, Zeljka Jutric, David K Imagawa, Reed I Ayabe","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with improved outcomes. However, most of these findings are dependent on cohorts who have had access to the OLT waitlist, and the policy's impact on non-OLT treatment strategies (eg, liver resection, ablation) remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era (P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with improved outcomes. However, most of these findings are dependent on cohorts who have had access to the OLT waitlist, and the policy's impact on non-OLT treatment strategies (eg, liver resection, ablation) remains poorly understood.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.
Results: Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era (P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year.
Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal.
Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed.
The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation.