Effectiveness of Microscopic Tubular Discectomy for Improved Pain and Mobility in Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Chamath Jagoda, Samantha Spanos, Timothy L Siu
{"title":"Effectiveness of Microscopic Tubular Discectomy for Improved Pain and Mobility in Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Chamath Jagoda, Samantha Spanos, Timothy L Siu","doi":"10.1111/os.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH) is a subtype of lumbar disc herniation marked by severe radicular and lower back pain, often accompanied by sensory and motor dysfunction. Microscopic tubular discectomy (MTD) is a contemporary minimally invasive approach for treating FLLDH, yet its superiority over conventional discectomy remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of MTD in improving pain and mobility for FLLDH patients. A secondary aim was to assess the safety of MTD. Primary outcome measures were patient-reported pain, assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), patient-reported mobility, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and scores on the Modified MacNab criteria clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measures were mean blood loss, operation duration, hospital stay, reherniation rate, reoperation rate, and any peri- or postoperative complications. MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for empirical studies on MTD for FLLDH, reporting pain or mobility outcomes. Data extracted included study design, participant characteristics, pre- and postmean scores for pain and mobility, blood loss, operation time, hospitalization duration, reherniation rate, and complications. Articles were quality appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal tools. Of 271 articles identified, 15 were included. Preoperative leg pain scores ranged from 5.5 to 8.6, and postoperative scores ranged from 1.2 to 3.8. For lower back pain, preoperative scores ranged from 2.4 to 7.6, with postoperative scores from 1 to 4.8. Seven studies assessed mobility using the ODI, reporting significant improvements; pre-operative scores ranged from 30.6 to 56.7, and postoperative scores ranged from 5.5 to 30.3. Seven studies used the Modified MacNab criteria, reporting excellent outcomes in 18.2%-71% of patients, good in 23%-54.5%, fair in 0%-18.2%, and poor in 0%-18%. Mean blood loss ranged from 30 to 70 mL, mean operation times from 43 to 126 min, and average hospital stays were, on average, ≤ 4 days. Reherniation was minimal, and the reoperation rate was low. Complications were rare, primarily transient neuropraxic symptoms. This review comprehensively synthesized empirical research on the effectiveness and safety of MTD for treating FLLDH. Overall, the findings indicate that MTD can reduce pain and improve mobility in patients with FLLDH, but limited sample sizes, variable follow-up periods, and a lack of controlled studies constrain definitive conclusions about MTD's superiority over other discectomy techniques. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023443900.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Far lateral lumbar disc herniation (FLLDH) is a subtype of lumbar disc herniation marked by severe radicular and lower back pain, often accompanied by sensory and motor dysfunction. Microscopic tubular discectomy (MTD) is a contemporary minimally invasive approach for treating FLLDH, yet its superiority over conventional discectomy remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of MTD in improving pain and mobility for FLLDH patients. A secondary aim was to assess the safety of MTD. Primary outcome measures were patient-reported pain, assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), patient-reported mobility, assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and scores on the Modified MacNab criteria clinical assessment. Secondary outcome measures were mean blood loss, operation duration, hospital stay, reherniation rate, reoperation rate, and any peri- or postoperative complications. MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched for empirical studies on MTD for FLLDH, reporting pain or mobility outcomes. Data extracted included study design, participant characteristics, pre- and postmean scores for pain and mobility, blood loss, operation time, hospitalization duration, reherniation rate, and complications. Articles were quality appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality appraisal tools. Of 271 articles identified, 15 were included. Preoperative leg pain scores ranged from 5.5 to 8.6, and postoperative scores ranged from 1.2 to 3.8. For lower back pain, preoperative scores ranged from 2.4 to 7.6, with postoperative scores from 1 to 4.8. Seven studies assessed mobility using the ODI, reporting significant improvements; pre-operative scores ranged from 30.6 to 56.7, and postoperative scores ranged from 5.5 to 30.3. Seven studies used the Modified MacNab criteria, reporting excellent outcomes in 18.2%-71% of patients, good in 23%-54.5%, fair in 0%-18.2%, and poor in 0%-18%. Mean blood loss ranged from 30 to 70 mL, mean operation times from 43 to 126 min, and average hospital stays were, on average, ≤ 4 days. Reherniation was minimal, and the reoperation rate was low. Complications were rare, primarily transient neuropraxic symptoms. This review comprehensively synthesized empirical research on the effectiveness and safety of MTD for treating FLLDH. Overall, the findings indicate that MTD can reduce pain and improve mobility in patients with FLLDH, but limited sample sizes, variable follow-up periods, and a lack of controlled studies constrain definitive conclusions about MTD's superiority over other discectomy techniques. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023443900.

显微管状椎间盘切除术改善远外侧腰椎间盘突出疼痛和活动的有效性:一项系统综述。
远侧位腰椎间盘突出症(FLLDH)是腰椎间盘突出症的一种亚型,其特征是严重的神经根和下背部疼痛,常伴有感觉和运动功能障碍。显微管状椎间盘切除术(MTD)是当代治疗FLLDH的微创方法,但其优于传统椎间盘切除术的优势尚不明确。本系统综述的目的是评估MTD在改善FLLDH患者疼痛和活动能力方面的有效性。第二个目的是评估MTD的安全性。主要结果测量是患者报告的疼痛,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估,患者报告的活动能力,使用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估,以及修改的MacNab标准临床评估得分。次要观察指标为平均出血量、手术时间、住院时间、再疝率、再手术率以及任何围手术期或术后并发症。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Scopus关于MTD治疗FLLDH的实证研究,报告了疼痛或活动结果。提取的数据包括研究设计、参与者特征、疼痛和活动能力、出血量、手术时间、住院时间、再疝率和并发症的平均前后评分。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)质量评估工具对文章进行质量评估。在确定的271篇文章中,纳入了15篇。术前腿部疼痛评分从5.5到8.6,术后评分从1.2到3.8。对于下背部疼痛,术前评分从2.4到7.6,术后评分从1到4.8。七项研究使用ODI评估了流动性,报告了显著的改善;术前评分30.6 ~ 56.7分,术后评分5.5 ~ 30.3分。7项研究使用改良的MacNab标准,报告了18.2%-71%的患者预后良好,23%-54.5%的患者预后良好,0%-18.2%的患者预后一般,0%-18%的患者预后较差。平均失血量30 ~ 70 mL,平均手术时间43 ~ 126 min,平均住院时间平均≤4天。再疝发生率低,再手术率低。并发症罕见,主要是短暂的神经功能症状。本文综述了MTD治疗FLLDH的有效性和安全性的实证研究。总的来说,研究结果表明MTD可以减轻FLLDH患者的疼痛和改善活动能力,但样本量有限,随访时间可变,缺乏对照研究限制了MTD优于其他椎间盘切除术技术的明确结论。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023443900。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信