Improving Compassionate Extubation Practices in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Elizabeth Rinaldi, Debbie Brostoff, Robin V Klein, Meredith C Winter
{"title":"Improving Compassionate Extubation Practices in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Elizabeth Rinaldi, Debbie Brostoff, Robin V Klein, Meredith C Winter","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was conducted in a free-standing pediatric academic institution in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU), focusing on children with planned compassionate extubation (CE). Prior to the study, variability in CE practices led to inconsistencies in care and communication.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Implement and assess the efficacy of a protocol to ensure consistent symptom management, enhance documentation, and promote communication among providers during CE events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre and post quality improvement project with implementation of a CE protocol in February 2022, including (1) a checklist to standardize orders, documentation, medical management, and provider availability around the time of CE and (2) a post-extubation staff debriefing tool. The study was carried out by a multidisciplinary team composed of providers, nurses, respiratory therapists, palliative care specialists, and a child life specialist. The improvement team evaluated CE events for a 12 month period before (January-December 2020) and for 12 months after (February 2022-January 2023) the intervention roll-out date via manual chart review and Research Electronic Data Capture surveys of staff members who participated in the CE. The primary outcome was the compliance with best practices surrounding documentation and clinical interventions at the time of CE. Secondary outcomes included staff satisfaction with the CE process and rate of debriefings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 18 pre-intervention events and 26 post-intervention CE events that underwent chart review. 53 surveys were reviewed, 20 pre-intervention and 33 post-intervention. There was a significant increase in the appropriate placement of extubation orders (6% prior to protocol, 69% at study conclusion), improvement in timely advance care plan documentation (89% prior to protocol, 100% at study conclusion), and increase in cessation of vasoactive infusions at the time of extubation (78% prior to protocol, 100% at study conclusion). The rates of debriefs remained similar before and after protocol implementation (65% and 67% respectively). Overall, the protocol was well received by ICU staff, over 90% of staff surveys showed positive feedback on patient and provider comfort during CE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A CE protocol improved documentation and communication around pediatric end-of-life care. Future improvements should focus on exploring the barriers to post-extubation debriefings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.09.029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted in a free-standing pediatric academic institution in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU), focusing on children with planned compassionate extubation (CE). Prior to the study, variability in CE practices led to inconsistencies in care and communication.

Objectives: Implement and assess the efficacy of a protocol to ensure consistent symptom management, enhance documentation, and promote communication among providers during CE events.

Methods: Pre and post quality improvement project with implementation of a CE protocol in February 2022, including (1) a checklist to standardize orders, documentation, medical management, and provider availability around the time of CE and (2) a post-extubation staff debriefing tool. The study was carried out by a multidisciplinary team composed of providers, nurses, respiratory therapists, palliative care specialists, and a child life specialist. The improvement team evaluated CE events for a 12 month period before (January-December 2020) and for 12 months after (February 2022-January 2023) the intervention roll-out date via manual chart review and Research Electronic Data Capture surveys of staff members who participated in the CE. The primary outcome was the compliance with best practices surrounding documentation and clinical interventions at the time of CE. Secondary outcomes included staff satisfaction with the CE process and rate of debriefings.

Results: There were 18 pre-intervention events and 26 post-intervention CE events that underwent chart review. 53 surveys were reviewed, 20 pre-intervention and 33 post-intervention. There was a significant increase in the appropriate placement of extubation orders (6% prior to protocol, 69% at study conclusion), improvement in timely advance care plan documentation (89% prior to protocol, 100% at study conclusion), and increase in cessation of vasoactive infusions at the time of extubation (78% prior to protocol, 100% at study conclusion). The rates of debriefs remained similar before and after protocol implementation (65% and 67% respectively). Overall, the protocol was well received by ICU staff, over 90% of staff surveys showed positive feedback on patient and provider comfort during CE.

Conclusions: A CE protocol improved documentation and communication around pediatric end-of-life care. Future improvements should focus on exploring the barriers to post-extubation debriefings.

改善儿童重症监护病房的同情心拔管实践。
背景:本研究在独立的儿科学术机构儿科重症监护室(PICU)和心胸重症监护室(CTICU)进行,重点研究计划体恤拔管(CE)的儿童。在这项研究之前,CE实践的可变性导致了护理和沟通的不一致。目标:实施和评估协议的有效性,以确保一致的症状管理,加强文档记录,并促进CE事件期间提供者之间的沟通。方法:在2022年2月实施CE协议的前后质量改进项目,包括(1)在CE期间标准化订单、文件、医疗管理和提供者可用性的清单和(2)拔管后工作人员报告工具。这项研究是由一个多学科团队进行的,该团队由提供者、护士、呼吸治疗师、姑息治疗专家和儿童生活专家组成。改进小组通过对参与行政长官的工作人员进行手工图表审查和研究电子数据采集调查,对干预措施推出日期之前(2020年1月至12月)和之后(2022年2月至2023年1月)的12个月的行政长官事件进行了评估。主要结果是CE时对文献和临床干预的最佳实践的依从性。次要结果包括员工对CE过程的满意度和汇报率。结果:有18个干预前事件和26个干预后CE事件进行了图表回顾。我们回顾了53份调查,其中20份是干预前调查,33份是干预后调查。拔管订单的适当放置显著增加(方案前6%,研究结束时69%),及时提前护理计划文件的改善(方案前89%,研究结束时100%),拔管时血管活性输注的停止增加(方案前78%,研究结束时100%)。执行协议前后的汇报率保持相似(分别为65%和67%)。总体而言,该方案得到了ICU员工的好评,超过90%的员工调查显示,在CE期间,患者和提供者的舒适度得到了积极的反馈。结论:CE协议改善了儿童临终关怀的文件记录和沟通。未来的改进应侧重于探索拔管后述情的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信