A Comparison of the Effects of Three Volitional Yoga Breathing Practices versus Two Nonvolitional Breathing Controls on Auditory-evoked Potentials.

IF 1.1 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
International Journal of Yoga Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_207_24
Dipak Chetry, Acharya Balkrishna, Shirley Telles
{"title":"A Comparison of the Effects of Three Volitional Yoga Breathing Practices versus Two Nonvolitional Breathing Controls on Auditory-evoked Potentials.","authors":"Dipak Chetry, Acharya Balkrishna, Shirley Telles","doi":"10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_207_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research has suggested that volitional yoga breathing (VYB) facilitates auditory information processing, whereas control nonvolitional breathing has opposite effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated auditory middle latency responses (AMLR) in (i) three VYB which vary breath rate differently (i.e., bellows yoga breathing, high-frequency yoga breathing, and bumblebee yoga breathing), and (ii) two control conditions (i.e., breath awareness and quiet rest).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty healthy participants aged between 18 and 35 years (M:F, 1:1) participated in this study, with assessment in five random order sessions (each 28 min) over 5 consecutive days. AMLR and respiration were assessed before, during, and after each session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the three VYB sessions, there were significant decreases in peak latencies (repeated-measures analysis of variance and preduring post hoc tests). In contrast, during breath awareness, the peak latencies of the Pa and Nb waves increased with no change in latencies during quiet rest.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The changes in peak latencies suggest VYB facilitated auditory transmission at thalamic and primary auditory cortex levels (based on the neural generators of AMLR components). In contrast, breath awareness was associated with prolonged transmission at primary auditory cortex levels (from Pa and Nb latency changes). Peak amplitude changes suggest neuronal recruitment increased during VYB but not during controls. Hence, irrespective of changes in breathing, VYB enhances sensory transmission, whereas nonvolitional breathing may inhibit it.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These changes may contribute to the beneficial effects of VYB in cognition and perception, with possible applications in various activities and occupations requiring optimal auditory sensory functioning. Limitations include a focus on experienced practitioners and the examination of short-term effects alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":14436,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Yoga","volume":"18 2","pages":"178-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Yoga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_207_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous research has suggested that volitional yoga breathing (VYB) facilitates auditory information processing, whereas control nonvolitional breathing has opposite effects.

Objective: This study investigated auditory middle latency responses (AMLR) in (i) three VYB which vary breath rate differently (i.e., bellows yoga breathing, high-frequency yoga breathing, and bumblebee yoga breathing), and (ii) two control conditions (i.e., breath awareness and quiet rest).

Methods: Fifty healthy participants aged between 18 and 35 years (M:F, 1:1) participated in this study, with assessment in five random order sessions (each 28 min) over 5 consecutive days. AMLR and respiration were assessed before, during, and after each session.

Results: During the three VYB sessions, there were significant decreases in peak latencies (repeated-measures analysis of variance and preduring post hoc tests). In contrast, during breath awareness, the peak latencies of the Pa and Nb waves increased with no change in latencies during quiet rest.

Discussion: The changes in peak latencies suggest VYB facilitated auditory transmission at thalamic and primary auditory cortex levels (based on the neural generators of AMLR components). In contrast, breath awareness was associated with prolonged transmission at primary auditory cortex levels (from Pa and Nb latency changes). Peak amplitude changes suggest neuronal recruitment increased during VYB but not during controls. Hence, irrespective of changes in breathing, VYB enhances sensory transmission, whereas nonvolitional breathing may inhibit it.

Conclusion: These changes may contribute to the beneficial effects of VYB in cognition and perception, with possible applications in various activities and occupations requiring optimal auditory sensory functioning. Limitations include a focus on experienced practitioners and the examination of short-term effects alone.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

三种意志瑜伽呼吸练习与两种非意志呼吸控制对听觉诱发电位的影响比较。
背景:先前的研究表明,意志瑜伽呼吸(VYB)促进听觉信息处理,而控制非意志呼吸具有相反的效果。目的:研究三种不同呼吸频率的VYB(即风箱瑜伽呼吸、高频瑜伽呼吸和大黄蜂瑜伽呼吸)和两种控制条件(即呼吸意识和安静休息)的听觉中潜伏期反应(AMLR)。方法:50名年龄在18 ~ 35岁之间的健康受试者(男:女,1:1)参加本研究,在连续5天内随机进行5次评估(每次28分钟)。在每次治疗前、期间和之后分别评估AMLR和呼吸。结果:在三次VYB会话期间,峰值潜伏期显著降低(重复测量方差分析和事前事后测试)。相比之下,在呼吸意识期间,Pa波和Nb波的峰值潜伏期增加,而在安静休息期间潜伏期没有变化。讨论:峰值潜伏期的变化表明VYB促进了丘脑和初级听觉皮层水平的听觉传递(基于AMLR成分的神经发生器)。相比之下,呼吸意识与初级听觉皮层水平的延长传递有关(来自Pa和Nb潜伏期的变化)。峰值振幅变化表明VYB期间神经元募集增加,而对照组没有。因此,不管呼吸的变化如何,VYB增强了感觉传递,而非自主呼吸可能会抑制它。结论:这些变化可能有助于VYB在认知和知觉方面的有益作用,并可能在各种需要最佳听觉功能的活动和职业中应用。局限性包括关注有经验的从业人员和仅检查短期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Yoga
International Journal of Yoga INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信