EXPERIENCES WITH THE M+A HOTLINE: SUPPORT ALONG THE SPECTRUM OF SELF-MANAGED ABORTION

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
E Chew Murphy, J Novaes, J Karlin
{"title":"EXPERIENCES WITH THE M+A HOTLINE: SUPPORT ALONG THE SPECTRUM OF SELF-MANAGED ABORTION","authors":"E Chew Murphy,&nbsp;J Novaes,&nbsp;J Karlin","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The clinician-run Miscarriage and Abortion Hotline (“M+A hotline”) offers evidence-based reproductive health information, including information on self-sourced and self-managed abortion, while maintaining privacy and anonymity. The hotline has supported thousands of individuals experiencing a miscarriage or abortion from across the US, and has seen a continued increase in the number of people seeking support since its inception in 2019. The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of people who access the M+A hotline and examine the hotline’s impact on their abortion experience.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From June 2024 to January 2025, we recruited 28 individuals from 19 US states who contacted the M+A hotline and completed an online survey. Participants were based throughout the US in states with and without restrictive abortion policies. We conducted anonymous in-depth interviews in English and stopped recruitment when conceptual saturation had been approximated. We analyzed transcripts using inductive and deductive codes and completed thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis revealed three key themes: Direct and personalized information from a clinician perspective facilitated participants’ trust in the hotline; by providing and validating information on abortion, the hotline alleviated participants’ concerns about prevalent disinformation; and amidst participants’ fears of the legal repercussions of self-sourced and self-managed abortion, the hotline provided a secure, anonymous way to communicate directly with clinicians for medical information and support.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings demonstrate that abortion experiences exist along a spectrum of informal to formal care utilization, and that the M+A hotline functions within this ecosystem to mitigate abortion stigma and disinformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002537","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The clinician-run Miscarriage and Abortion Hotline (“M+A hotline”) offers evidence-based reproductive health information, including information on self-sourced and self-managed abortion, while maintaining privacy and anonymity. The hotline has supported thousands of individuals experiencing a miscarriage or abortion from across the US, and has seen a continued increase in the number of people seeking support since its inception in 2019. The purpose of this study is to describe the experiences of people who access the M+A hotline and examine the hotline’s impact on their abortion experience.

Methods

From June 2024 to January 2025, we recruited 28 individuals from 19 US states who contacted the M+A hotline and completed an online survey. Participants were based throughout the US in states with and without restrictive abortion policies. We conducted anonymous in-depth interviews in English and stopped recruitment when conceptual saturation had been approximated. We analyzed transcripts using inductive and deductive codes and completed thematic analysis.

Results

The analysis revealed three key themes: Direct and personalized information from a clinician perspective facilitated participants’ trust in the hotline; by providing and validating information on abortion, the hotline alleviated participants’ concerns about prevalent disinformation; and amidst participants’ fears of the legal repercussions of self-sourced and self-managed abortion, the hotline provided a secure, anonymous way to communicate directly with clinicians for medical information and support.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that abortion experiences exist along a spectrum of informal to formal care utilization, and that the M+A hotline functions within this ecosystem to mitigate abortion stigma and disinformation.
m + a热线的经验:对自我管理堕胎的支持
目的由临床医生运营的流产和堕胎热线(“ M+A热线”)提供循证生殖健康信息,包括自我来源和自我管理的堕胎信息,同时保持隐私和匿名性。该热线已为美国各地数千名经历流产或堕胎的人提供了支持,自2019年开通以来,寻求支持的人数持续增加。本研究的目的是描述人们访问M+A热线的经历,并检查热线对其堕胎经历的影响。方法:从2024年6月到2025年1月,我们从美国19个州招募了28名联系并购热线的个人,并完成了在线调查。参与者来自美国各地有或没有限制堕胎政策的州。我们用英语进行匿名深度访谈,当概念饱和接近时停止招聘。我们使用归纳和演绎代码分析转录本,并完成主题分析。结果分析揭示了三个关键主题:从临床医生角度出发的直接和个性化信息促进了参与者对热线的信任;通过提供和验证有关堕胎的信息,热线减轻了参与者对普遍存在的虚假信息的担忧;在参与者担心自行来源和自行管理堕胎的法律后果时,热线提供了一种安全、匿名的方式,可以直接与临床医生沟通,以获取医疗信息和支持。结论我们的研究结果表明,堕胎经历存在于非正式到正式护理利用的范围内,并且M+ a热线在这个生态系统中发挥作用,以减轻堕胎耻辱和虚假信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信