ABORTION VOLUME IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA BEFORE AND AFTER DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
RL Shay, BA Chen, KP Himes
{"title":"ABORTION VOLUME IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA BEFORE AND AFTER DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION","authors":"RL Shay,&nbsp;BA Chen,&nbsp;KP Himes","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We compared the number and characteristics of abortions in two practice settings in western Pennsylvania before and after <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an academic medical center (in-hospital) and a freestanding abortion clinic (out-of-hospital) between July 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023. We collected data on total number of abortions, gestational duration, proportion performed in the second trimester, type of abortion, and patient age and state of residence. We compared abortions between July 2021 and May 2022 (pre-<em>Dobbs</em>) with those between July 2022 and May 2023 (post-<em>Dobbs</em>) using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests. We repeated the analysis stratifying by site.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total number of abortions across the two sites was 3,114 pre-<em>Dobbs</em> and 3,153 post-<em>Dobbs</em>. Post-<em>Dobbs</em> in-hospital abortions had a lower median gestational duration than did those pre-<em>Dobbs</em> (9 vs. 12 weeks, p&lt;0.01) and these patients were less likely to be from out-of-state (8.8% vs. 13.1%, p=0.04). In contrast, post-<em>Dobbs</em> out-of-hospital abortion patients had a higher median gestational duration than did those pre-<em>Dobbs</em> (9 vs. 8 weeks, p&lt;0.01) and patients were more likely to be from out-of-state (26.6% vs. 16.3%, p&lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Out-of-hospital abortions were more likely to be from out-of-state and occurred at later gestational ages post-<em>Dobbs</em> than pre-<em>Dobbs</em>, while the opposite trends were seen for in-hospital abortion patients. The differences between sites suggest that the burden of increased demand from out-of-state patients was disproportionately absorbed by community abortion providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

We compared the number and characteristics of abortions in two practice settings in western Pennsylvania before and after Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an academic medical center (in-hospital) and a freestanding abortion clinic (out-of-hospital) between July 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023. We collected data on total number of abortions, gestational duration, proportion performed in the second trimester, type of abortion, and patient age and state of residence. We compared abortions between July 2021 and May 2022 (pre-Dobbs) with those between July 2022 and May 2023 (post-Dobbs) using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests. We repeated the analysis stratifying by site.

Results

The total number of abortions across the two sites was 3,114 pre-Dobbs and 3,153 post-Dobbs. Post-Dobbs in-hospital abortions had a lower median gestational duration than did those pre-Dobbs (9 vs. 12 weeks, p<0.01) and these patients were less likely to be from out-of-state (8.8% vs. 13.1%, p=0.04). In contrast, post-Dobbs out-of-hospital abortion patients had a higher median gestational duration than did those pre-Dobbs (9 vs. 8 weeks, p<0.01) and patients were more likely to be from out-of-state (26.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.01).

Conclusions

Out-of-hospital abortions were more likely to be from out-of-state and occurred at later gestational ages post-Dobbs than pre-Dobbs, while the opposite trends were seen for in-hospital abortion patients. The differences between sites suggest that the burden of increased demand from out-of-state patients was disproportionately absorbed by community abortion providers.
多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后宾夕法尼亚州西部的堕胎量
目的比较多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后宾夕法尼亚州西部两家诊所的堕胎数量和特点。方法对2021年7月1日至2023年5月31日期间在一家学术医疗中心(院内)和一家独立堕胎诊所(院外)进行的所有堕胎进行回顾性队列研究。我们收集了流产总数、妊娠期、妊娠中期比例、流产类型、患者年龄和居住州等数据。我们使用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验比较了2021年7月至2022年5月(多布斯前)和2022年7月至2023年5月(多布斯后)的堕胎情况。我们按地点分层重复分析。结果多布斯前和多布斯后两地流产总数分别为3114例和3153例。多布斯手术后住院流产的中位妊娠持续时间比多布斯手术前低(9周对12周,p= 0.01),这些患者来自州外的可能性更低(8.8%对13.1%,p=0.04)。相比之下,多布斯手术后院外流产患者的中位妊娠期高于多布斯手术前的患者(9周vs. 8周,p<0.01),患者更可能来自州外(26.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.01)。结论院外流产发生于州外,发生于多布斯手术后比多布斯手术前的胎龄更晚,而院内流产患者的趋势则相反。不同地点之间的差异表明,州外患者需求增加的负担被社区堕胎提供者不成比例地吸收了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信