{"title":"Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Real Intelligence: Self-Scaffolding Computational Modeling with Generative AI in Chemistry","authors":"Andreas Haraldsrud*, and , Tor Ole B. Odden, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Chemistry education researchers have, for many years, explored different ways of learning chemistry through modeling and open-ended problem-solving. With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT, students now have access to dynamic scaffolds that can potentially support them in modeling. However, we still know little about how these tools function within such contexts. This study investigates how students in higher education use GenAI to engage in complex computational modeling in chemistry. Using cognitive clinical interviews with think-aloud protocols, the role of GenAI in students’ modeling activities is analyzed through the lens of distributed cognition. The findings from this study reveal four distinct patterns of GenAI use: (1) Leveraging AI to retrieve and clarify information, (2) Using GenAI to test and critique ideas, (3) Outsourcing thinking to the AI, and (4) GenAI output exceeds student understanding. Productive interactions occurred when students actively orchestrated the AI as part of a distributed cognitive system, using it to retrieve, evaluate, and build upon their own reasoning. In contrast, unproductive use occurred when students outsourced thinking to the AI or were overwhelmed by outputs they could not integrate into their existing knowledge. These findings suggest that effective use of GenAI in chemistry education depends not only on technical proficiency, but also on students’ ability to structure prompts, evaluate AI output, and retain control of the problem-solving process. We argue that the use of GenAI should be explicitly addressed in chemistry instruction and propose that students be taught to engage with GenAI as part of a distributed cognitive system─ – retaining executive control, providing appropriate context, and iteratively refining their inquiries─ – to support meaningful engagement and learning in chemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 10","pages":"4255–4266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00657","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Chemistry education researchers have, for many years, explored different ways of learning chemistry through modeling and open-ended problem-solving. With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT, students now have access to dynamic scaffolds that can potentially support them in modeling. However, we still know little about how these tools function within such contexts. This study investigates how students in higher education use GenAI to engage in complex computational modeling in chemistry. Using cognitive clinical interviews with think-aloud protocols, the role of GenAI in students’ modeling activities is analyzed through the lens of distributed cognition. The findings from this study reveal four distinct patterns of GenAI use: (1) Leveraging AI to retrieve and clarify information, (2) Using GenAI to test and critique ideas, (3) Outsourcing thinking to the AI, and (4) GenAI output exceeds student understanding. Productive interactions occurred when students actively orchestrated the AI as part of a distributed cognitive system, using it to retrieve, evaluate, and build upon their own reasoning. In contrast, unproductive use occurred when students outsourced thinking to the AI or were overwhelmed by outputs they could not integrate into their existing knowledge. These findings suggest that effective use of GenAI in chemistry education depends not only on technical proficiency, but also on students’ ability to structure prompts, evaluate AI output, and retain control of the problem-solving process. We argue that the use of GenAI should be explicitly addressed in chemistry instruction and propose that students be taught to engage with GenAI as part of a distributed cognitive system─ – retaining executive control, providing appropriate context, and iteratively refining their inquiries─ – to support meaningful engagement and learning in chemistry.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.