Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Real Intelligence: Self-Scaffolding Computational Modeling with Generative AI in Chemistry

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andreas Haraldsrud*,  and , Tor Ole B. Odden, 
{"title":"Bridging Artificial Intelligence and Real Intelligence: Self-Scaffolding Computational Modeling with Generative AI in Chemistry","authors":"Andreas Haraldsrud*,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Tor Ole B. Odden,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Chemistry education researchers have, for many years, explored different ways of learning chemistry through modeling and open-ended problem-solving. With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT, students now have access to dynamic scaffolds that can potentially support them in modeling. However, we still know little about how these tools function within such contexts. This study investigates how students in higher education use GenAI to engage in complex computational modeling in chemistry. Using cognitive clinical interviews with think-aloud protocols, the role of GenAI in students’ modeling activities is analyzed through the lens of distributed cognition. The findings from this study reveal four distinct patterns of GenAI use: (1) Leveraging AI to retrieve and clarify information, (2) Using GenAI to test and critique ideas, (3) Outsourcing thinking to the AI, and (4) GenAI output exceeds student understanding. Productive interactions occurred when students actively orchestrated the AI as part of a distributed cognitive system, using it to retrieve, evaluate, and build upon their own reasoning. In contrast, unproductive use occurred when students outsourced thinking to the AI or were overwhelmed by outputs they could not integrate into their existing knowledge. These findings suggest that effective use of GenAI in chemistry education depends not only on technical proficiency, but also on students’ ability to structure prompts, evaluate AI output, and retain control of the problem-solving process. We argue that the use of GenAI should be explicitly addressed in chemistry instruction and propose that students be taught to engage with GenAI as part of a distributed cognitive system─ – retaining executive control, providing appropriate context, and iteratively refining their inquiries─ – to support meaningful engagement and learning in chemistry.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"102 10","pages":"4255–4266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00657","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c00657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemistry education researchers have, for many years, explored different ways of learning chemistry through modeling and open-ended problem-solving. With the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools such as ChatGPT, students now have access to dynamic scaffolds that can potentially support them in modeling. However, we still know little about how these tools function within such contexts. This study investigates how students in higher education use GenAI to engage in complex computational modeling in chemistry. Using cognitive clinical interviews with think-aloud protocols, the role of GenAI in students’ modeling activities is analyzed through the lens of distributed cognition. The findings from this study reveal four distinct patterns of GenAI use: (1) Leveraging AI to retrieve and clarify information, (2) Using GenAI to test and critique ideas, (3) Outsourcing thinking to the AI, and (4) GenAI output exceeds student understanding. Productive interactions occurred when students actively orchestrated the AI as part of a distributed cognitive system, using it to retrieve, evaluate, and build upon their own reasoning. In contrast, unproductive use occurred when students outsourced thinking to the AI or were overwhelmed by outputs they could not integrate into their existing knowledge. These findings suggest that effective use of GenAI in chemistry education depends not only on technical proficiency, but also on students’ ability to structure prompts, evaluate AI output, and retain control of the problem-solving process. We argue that the use of GenAI should be explicitly addressed in chemistry instruction and propose that students be taught to engage with GenAI as part of a distributed cognitive system─ – retaining executive control, providing appropriate context, and iteratively refining their inquiries─ – to support meaningful engagement and learning in chemistry.

桥接人工智能和真正的智能:化学中的自脚手架计算建模与生成式人工智能
多年来,化学教育研究人员一直在探索通过建模和开放式问题解决来学习化学的不同方法。随着ChatGPT等生成式人工智能(GenAI)工具的出现,学生们现在可以使用动态支架来潜在地支持他们建模。然而,我们对这些工具如何在这样的环境中发挥作用仍然知之甚少。本研究探讨了高等教育学生如何使用GenAI进行复杂的化学计算建模。通过认知临床访谈和有声思考协议,通过分布式认知的视角分析GenAI在学生建模活动中的作用。本研究的发现揭示了四种不同的GenAI使用模式:(1)利用人工智能检索和澄清信息,(2)使用GenAI测试和批评想法,(3)将思维外包给人工智能,(4)GenAI输出超出学生的理解能力。当学生积极地将人工智能作为分布式认知系统的一部分,使用它来检索、评估和建立自己的推理时,就会产生富有成效的互动。相反,当学生将思考外包给人工智能,或者被无法整合到现有知识中的输出所淹没时,就会出现非生产性使用。这些发现表明,在化学教育中有效使用GenAI不仅取决于技术熟练程度,还取决于学生组织提示、评估AI输出和保持对问题解决过程控制的能力。我们认为,应该在化学教学中明确说明GenAI的使用,并建议将GenAI作为分布式认知系统的一部分教授学生──保留执行控制,提供适当的背景,并迭代地改进他们的提问──以支持有意义的化学参与和学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信