{"title":"Nurse Roles Implementing the Choice for Self-Collection Cervical Screening in Rural Settings: A Qualitative Study Following National Policy Change.","authors":"Tessa Saunders,Lucy Boyd,Ana Machado Colling,Jessie He,Kerryann Wyatt,Claire Nightingale","doi":"10.1111/jan.70286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo explore the key factors influencing nurses' capability, opportunity and motivation to offer the choice for self-collection for cervical screening within rural primary care services, following a national policy change in Australia.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA qualitative study informed by implementation and behavioural change frameworks.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nPrimary health nurses working in Victoria were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews via video or telephone between December 2022 and March 2023. Eighteen nurses from 18 clinics participated. Interview data were analysed following a Framework analysis approach, and themes were mapped to the COM-B model.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nNurses were highly motivated to offer the choice for self-collection due to perceived advantages for their patients and potential opportunities for reaching people hesitant to screen. There was variation in how nurses offered this choice, and to whom. Some nurses were concerned about lost opportunities to visualise the vulval area or cervix, or to have broader health and wellbeing conversations with patients. Views were mixed about how self-collection would impact nurse roles, and several external factors were impacting their opportunities as cervical screening providers.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAppropriately trained nurses have the capability and motivation to incorporate the choice for self-collection within their screening practice; however, their opportunity to maximise equity and increase participation is impacted by funding models and structures that limit their autonomy.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nPeople living outside major cities experience greater healthcare inequities. Australia introduced access to the choice for self-collection for all eligible individuals in 2022, in part to achieve greater equity in the national screening program. Nurses can play a key role in program delivery. Understanding how they incorporate self-collection into their practice, and the key factors influencing implementation in rural primary care settings, can inform future program implementation and improve outcomes for patients.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nWe have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT\r\nThis study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70286","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
To explore the key factors influencing nurses' capability, opportunity and motivation to offer the choice for self-collection for cervical screening within rural primary care services, following a national policy change in Australia.
DESIGN
A qualitative study informed by implementation and behavioural change frameworks.
METHODS
Primary health nurses working in Victoria were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews via video or telephone between December 2022 and March 2023. Eighteen nurses from 18 clinics participated. Interview data were analysed following a Framework analysis approach, and themes were mapped to the COM-B model.
RESULTS
Nurses were highly motivated to offer the choice for self-collection due to perceived advantages for their patients and potential opportunities for reaching people hesitant to screen. There was variation in how nurses offered this choice, and to whom. Some nurses were concerned about lost opportunities to visualise the vulval area or cervix, or to have broader health and wellbeing conversations with patients. Views were mixed about how self-collection would impact nurse roles, and several external factors were impacting their opportunities as cervical screening providers.
CONCLUSIONS
Appropriately trained nurses have the capability and motivation to incorporate the choice for self-collection within their screening practice; however, their opportunity to maximise equity and increase participation is impacted by funding models and structures that limit their autonomy.
IMPACT
People living outside major cities experience greater healthcare inequities. Australia introduced access to the choice for self-collection for all eligible individuals in 2022, in part to achieve greater equity in the national screening program. Nurses can play a key role in program delivery. Understanding how they incorporate self-collection into their practice, and the key factors influencing implementation in rural primary care settings, can inform future program implementation and improve outcomes for patients.
REPORTING METHOD
We have adhered to COREQ reporting guidelines.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.