{"title":"A comprehensive airway evaluation for head and neck surgery: from prediction to strategy.","authors":"Gerardo Cortese, Luigi La Via, Johannes M Huitink","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review discusses airway management in head and neck surgery, highlighting the shift from prediction-based assessment to strategy-based planning and risk stratification, and offers a model for comprehensive evaluation and management in this complex patient population.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Traditionally, the literature has focused on risk stratification rather than binary prediction of complexity, encompassing anatomical, disease-specific, functional and radiological parameters. Recent advances include context-sensitive planning, algorithm-driven airway checklists to identify complexity, team-directed approaches, and cognitive aids designed to facilitate rapid access to primary and alternative plans. New technologies such as dual endoscopy and high-flow nasal oxygen have expanded the clinician's toolkit, offering tailored methods to treat different challenges both patient (obstructed/bleeding airways) and surgery related (laser procedures/shared 'field of action'), thereby improving safety. Postoperative airway management and extubation planning have also been reinforced to reduce complications.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Safe airway management during head and neck surgery requires careful preoperative evaluation, a tailored approach, and effective interdisciplinary collaboration. The integration of new technologies and evidence-based strategies has contributed to improving both safety and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review discusses airway management in head and neck surgery, highlighting the shift from prediction-based assessment to strategy-based planning and risk stratification, and offers a model for comprehensive evaluation and management in this complex patient population.
Recent findings: Traditionally, the literature has focused on risk stratification rather than binary prediction of complexity, encompassing anatomical, disease-specific, functional and radiological parameters. Recent advances include context-sensitive planning, algorithm-driven airway checklists to identify complexity, team-directed approaches, and cognitive aids designed to facilitate rapid access to primary and alternative plans. New technologies such as dual endoscopy and high-flow nasal oxygen have expanded the clinician's toolkit, offering tailored methods to treat different challenges both patient (obstructed/bleeding airways) and surgery related (laser procedures/shared 'field of action'), thereby improving safety. Postoperative airway management and extubation planning have also been reinforced to reduce complications.
Summary: Safe airway management during head and neck surgery requires careful preoperative evaluation, a tailored approach, and effective interdisciplinary collaboration. The integration of new technologies and evidence-based strategies has contributed to improving both safety and outcomes.