A German perspective on hybrid diagnosis-related group.

IF 2.1
Frank Vescia, Tim Deegener
{"title":"A German perspective on hybrid diagnosis-related group.","authors":"Frank Vescia, Tim Deegener","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>In Germany, the introduction of hybrid diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) represents an effort to reduce the proportion of inpatient care and thereby lower healthcare costs for statutory health insurance funds.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>At the same time, a system of incentives is being introduced to promote outpatient treatment. This shift leads to financial losses in the hospital sector, while potentially generating financial gains for providers in the statutory outpatient care sector; however, the current political and regulatory environment does not support stable investment in sector-specific remuneration - neither in the private practice sector nor within hospitals. Whether the anticipated cost savings for health insurance funds will actually be realised remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The implementation of hybrid DRGs carries the risk that patients with significant comorbidities may receive less reliable perioperative care. The broader impact on patient outcomes and overall care quality has yet to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: In Germany, the introduction of hybrid diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) represents an effort to reduce the proportion of inpatient care and thereby lower healthcare costs for statutory health insurance funds.

Recent findings: At the same time, a system of incentives is being introduced to promote outpatient treatment. This shift leads to financial losses in the hospital sector, while potentially generating financial gains for providers in the statutory outpatient care sector; however, the current political and regulatory environment does not support stable investment in sector-specific remuneration - neither in the private practice sector nor within hospitals. Whether the anticipated cost savings for health insurance funds will actually be realised remains uncertain.

Summary: The implementation of hybrid DRGs carries the risk that patients with significant comorbidities may receive less reliable perioperative care. The broader impact on patient outcomes and overall care quality has yet to be determined.

德国对杂交诊断相关群体的看法。
审查目的:在德国,引入混合诊断相关组(drg)是为了减少住院治疗的比例,从而降低法定健康保险基金的医疗费用。最近的发现:与此同时,一套激励机制正在被引入以促进门诊治疗。这种转变导致医院部门的经济损失,同时可能为法定门诊护理部门的提供者带来经济收益;然而,目前的政治和监管环境不支持对特定部门薪酬的稳定投资——无论是在私人执业部门还是在医院内部。健康保险基金的预期费用节约是否会真正实现仍不确定。摘要:混合DRGs的实施有风险,有明显合并症的患者可能得不到可靠的围手术期护理。对患者预后和整体护理质量的更广泛影响尚未确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信