Accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for women from ethnic minority groups: a synopsis of the PAAM study.

Nikolina Jovanović, Maev Conneely, Sarah Bicknell, Jelena Janković
{"title":"Accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for women from ethnic minority groups: a synopsis of the PAAM study.","authors":"Nikolina Jovanović, Maev Conneely, Sarah Bicknell, Jelena Janković","doi":"10.3310/TDAS1298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethnic minority women face worse maternity outcomes and increased risk of perinatal mental health issues, yet research on the accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for these groups is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) To explore access to and utilisation of mental health services during the perinatal period among ethnic minority women; (2) to explore care pathways to community and inpatient perinatal mental health services; (3) to explore the attitudes, experiences and service improvement suggestions of ethnic minority women with perinatal mental health problems, as well as those of their partners, family members and healthcare professionals and (4) to produce recommendations for improving clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed-methods study was conducted during 2018-23, encompassing four studies aligned with specific aims: (1) a population-based study of 615,092 women who gave birth in National Health Services hospitals in England, using data from the National Commissioning Data Repository; (2) a retrospective evaluation of patients accessing community perinatal mental health services in Birmingham and London (<i>n</i> = 228) and inpatient services in Birmingham, London and Nottingham (<i>n</i> = 198) using an adapted World Health Organization care pathways questionnaire; (3) a qualitative study with four cohorts across England: service users (<i>n</i> = 37), non-users or those who disengaged (<i>n</i> = 23), partners/family (<i>n</i> = 15) and healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 24); (4) findings informed recommendations for practice improvements, coproduced with individuals with lived experience of perinatal mental illness and of being in a minoritised ethnic group. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Access issues to mental health services were evident for Black African, Asian and White other women compared to White British women. Variability in patient journeys to community perinatal mental health services seem to stem from service-level factors rather than patient needs. Asian patients had more emergency admissions to Mother and Baby Units, while Black patients were less likely to experience multiple services before Mother and Baby Unit admission. Barriers to access included limited service awareness, fear of child removal, stigma, remote clinical appointments and unresponsive services. Despite these challenges, many women found services helpful. Family members noted gaps in family-focused care. Recommendations for improvement include raising awareness, monitoring access for different ethnic groups and addressing concerns about child removal, with a focus on consistent care, family involvement and cultural sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings shed light on health inequalities in perinatal mental health care for ethnic minority women. The results can be utilised to address existing barriers and improve outcomes for mothers, infants and families.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Diversity within merged ethnic groups; limited sample of non-English-speaking women; reliance on self-reported measures; use of pre-COVID-19 data; under-representation of Black women who did not engage with services, and over-representation of Black and Asian patients in Birmingham and London samples in the study exploring patient pathways to Mother and Baby Units (compared to maternity population).</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Implementation of good practices in perinatal mental health care, targeted interventions to address the fear of child removal, innovative strategies to recruit Black and non-English-speaking women and exploring the experiences of 'White other' women.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 17/105/14.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 36","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/TDAS1298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ethnic minority women face worse maternity outcomes and increased risk of perinatal mental health issues, yet research on the accessibility and acceptability of perinatal mental health services for these groups is limited.

Objectives: (1) To explore access to and utilisation of mental health services during the perinatal period among ethnic minority women; (2) to explore care pathways to community and inpatient perinatal mental health services; (3) to explore the attitudes, experiences and service improvement suggestions of ethnic minority women with perinatal mental health problems, as well as those of their partners, family members and healthcare professionals and (4) to produce recommendations for improving clinical practice.

Methods: Mixed-methods study was conducted during 2018-23, encompassing four studies aligned with specific aims: (1) a population-based study of 615,092 women who gave birth in National Health Services hospitals in England, using data from the National Commissioning Data Repository; (2) a retrospective evaluation of patients accessing community perinatal mental health services in Birmingham and London (n = 228) and inpatient services in Birmingham, London and Nottingham (n = 198) using an adapted World Health Organization care pathways questionnaire; (3) a qualitative study with four cohorts across England: service users (n = 37), non-users or those who disengaged (n = 23), partners/family (n = 15) and healthcare professionals (n = 24); (4) findings informed recommendations for practice improvements, coproduced with individuals with lived experience of perinatal mental illness and of being in a minoritised ethnic group. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Results: Access issues to mental health services were evident for Black African, Asian and White other women compared to White British women. Variability in patient journeys to community perinatal mental health services seem to stem from service-level factors rather than patient needs. Asian patients had more emergency admissions to Mother and Baby Units, while Black patients were less likely to experience multiple services before Mother and Baby Unit admission. Barriers to access included limited service awareness, fear of child removal, stigma, remote clinical appointments and unresponsive services. Despite these challenges, many women found services helpful. Family members noted gaps in family-focused care. Recommendations for improvement include raising awareness, monitoring access for different ethnic groups and addressing concerns about child removal, with a focus on consistent care, family involvement and cultural sensitivity.

Conclusion: These findings shed light on health inequalities in perinatal mental health care for ethnic minority women. The results can be utilised to address existing barriers and improve outcomes for mothers, infants and families.

Limitations: Diversity within merged ethnic groups; limited sample of non-English-speaking women; reliance on self-reported measures; use of pre-COVID-19 data; under-representation of Black women who did not engage with services, and over-representation of Black and Asian patients in Birmingham and London samples in the study exploring patient pathways to Mother and Baby Units (compared to maternity population).

Future work: Implementation of good practices in perinatal mental health care, targeted interventions to address the fear of child removal, innovative strategies to recruit Black and non-English-speaking women and exploring the experiences of 'White other' women.

Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 17/105/14.

少数民族妇女围产期心理健康服务的可及性和可接受性:PAAM研究摘要
背景:少数民族妇女面临更差的分娩结果和围产期心理健康问题的风险增加,但对这些群体围产期心理健康服务的可及性和可接受性的研究有限。目标:(1)探讨少数民族妇女在围产期获得和利用心理健康服务的情况;(2)探索社区和住院围生期心理健康服务的护理途径;(3)探讨少数民族妇女及其伴侣、家庭成员和医护人员对围产期心理健康问题的态度、经验和服务改进建议;(4)提出改进临床实践的建议。方法:在2018-23年期间进行了混合方法研究,包括四项符合具体目标的研究:(1)基于人群的研究,研究对象是615092名在英格兰国家卫生服务医院分娩的妇女,使用的数据来自国家委托数据库;(2)采用世界卫生组织护理路径问卷对伯明翰和伦敦社区围产期精神卫生服务(n = 228)和伯明翰、伦敦和诺丁汉住院服务(n = 198)的患者进行回顾性评估;(3)在英格兰进行的四组定性研究:服务使用者(n = 37)、非使用者或脱离者(n = 23)、伴侣/家庭(n = 15)和医疗保健专业人员(n = 24);(4)研究结果为实践改进提供了建议,这些建议是与有围产期精神疾病生活经历的个体和少数民族共同提出的。采用定量和定性方法分析数据。结果:与英国白人妇女相比,非洲黑人、亚洲人和其他白人妇女获得心理健康服务的问题很明显。患者前往社区围产期心理健康服务的行程差异似乎源于服务水平因素,而不是患者需求。亚裔患者有更多的紧急入院的母婴,而黑人患者不太可能在母婴入院前经历多种服务。获得服务的障碍包括对服务的认识有限、害怕儿童被带走、耻辱、远程临床预约和服务反应迟钝。尽管面临这些挑战,许多妇女发现服务很有帮助。家庭成员注意到以家庭为中心的护理存在差距。改进的建议包括提高认识,监测不同族裔群体的使用情况,解决有关儿童被带走的问题,重点是持续的照料、家庭参与和文化敏感性。结论:本研究结果揭示了少数民族妇女围产期心理保健中的健康不平等现象。研究结果可用于解决现有障碍,改善母亲、婴儿和家庭的结果。限制:合并的族裔群体内部的多样性;有限的非英语女性样本;依赖自我报告的措施;使用covid -19前数据;在探索母婴病房患者途径的研究中,伯明翰和伦敦样本中黑人和亚洲患者的代表性过高(与产妇人口相比),未参与服务的黑人妇女的代表性不足。今后的工作:在围产期心理保健方面实施良好做法,采取有针对性的干预措施,消除对儿童被带走的恐惧,采取创新战略,招募黑人和非英语妇女,探索“其他白人”妇女的经历。资助:本摘要介绍了由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究方案资助的独立研究,奖励号为17/105/14。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信