Why AI Governance Should Be a Focal Issue for Gerontology.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Clara Berridge, Anita Ho
{"title":"Why AI Governance Should Be a Focal Issue for Gerontology.","authors":"Clara Berridge, Anita Ho","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnaf234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Today, technologies described as artificial intelligence (AI) impact older adults in numerous and diverse ways, yet the field of gerontology has not seriously engaged AI governance. From algorithmic decision making used in health insurance, employment, housing, and public benefits, to the information ecosystem, to AI companions, AI applications implicate important issues of ethics, service access, and ageism. Policy levers could help address these issues and mitigate harm, but there is currently a paucity of federal AI regulations. As AI and algorithmic harms are better understood, the call from public interest groups and researchers in various fields has gotten louder for comprehensive AI and data privacy policy in the United States. Yet there has been little attention on how rapid development and deployment of AI may affect older adults, and their diverse interests are not well represented in discourses about AI policy making or governance. Drawing on a narrative synthesis of academic and policy literature and attending to the principles in the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, we explain how these principles can guide the development of ethical governance of AI to ensure accountable development and implementation to promote the interests of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaf234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, technologies described as artificial intelligence (AI) impact older adults in numerous and diverse ways, yet the field of gerontology has not seriously engaged AI governance. From algorithmic decision making used in health insurance, employment, housing, and public benefits, to the information ecosystem, to AI companions, AI applications implicate important issues of ethics, service access, and ageism. Policy levers could help address these issues and mitigate harm, but there is currently a paucity of federal AI regulations. As AI and algorithmic harms are better understood, the call from public interest groups and researchers in various fields has gotten louder for comprehensive AI and data privacy policy in the United States. Yet there has been little attention on how rapid development and deployment of AI may affect older adults, and their diverse interests are not well represented in discourses about AI policy making or governance. Drawing on a narrative synthesis of academic and policy literature and attending to the principles in the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights, we explain how these principles can guide the development of ethical governance of AI to ensure accountable development and implementation to promote the interests of older adults.

为什么人工智能治理应该成为老年学的焦点问题。
如今,被称为人工智能(AI)的技术以多种多样的方式影响着老年人,但老年学领域尚未认真参与人工智能治理。从用于医疗保险、就业、住房和公共福利的算法决策,到信息生态系统,再到人工智能伴侣,人工智能应用涉及道德、服务获取和年龄歧视等重要问题。政策杠杆可以帮助解决这些问题并减轻危害,但目前缺乏联邦人工智能法规。随着人们对人工智能和算法危害的认识加深,公益团体和各领域研究人员要求美国制定全面的人工智能和数据隐私政策的呼声越来越高。然而,很少有人关注人工智能的快速发展和部署对老年人的影响,而且他们的不同兴趣在人工智能政策制定或治理的论述中没有得到很好的体现。根据学术和政策文献的叙事综合,并遵循《人工智能权利法案蓝图》中的原则,我们解释了这些原则如何指导人工智能伦理治理的发展,以确保负责任的发展和实施,以促进老年人的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信