Diagnostic Value of CDO1 Promoter Methylation in Lung Cancer via Liquid Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.1 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Yuheng Yan, Ziyang Xu, Fangfang Liu, Yuhan Jia, Qian Chu, Xun Yuan
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of <i>CDO1</i> Promoter Methylation in Lung Cancer via Liquid Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yuheng Yan, Ziyang Xu, Fangfang Liu, Yuhan Jia, Qian Chu, Xun Yuan","doi":"10.31083/FBL43987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate cysteine dioxygenase 1 (<i>CDO1</i>) gene promoter methylation in circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data up to June 5, 2025, across electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched. The quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the incorporated studies. A random-effects model was employed to generate summary statistics for diagnostic accuracy, which included pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. An exploration of heterogeneity sources was undertaken using meta-regression, followed by a sensitivity analysis to test the consistency of the results. Finally, Deek's funnel plot was generated to estimate publication bias, and the clinical feasibility was evaluated using Fagan's nomogram.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven relevant studies were included in this meta-analysis. No major concerns regarding the quality risk of the included studies were observed. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and DOR values of the <i>CDO1</i> promoter methylation for lung cancer were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82), and 5.96 (95% CI: 4.06-8.74), respectively, and the area under curve was 0.7423. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in sensitivity (I<sup>2</sup> = 73%, <i>p</i> < 0.1), specificity (I<sup>2</sup> = 79.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.1), and DOR (I<sup>2</sup> = 42.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.1); however, variables such as the region, sample source, sample size, and detection method did not significantly affect heterogeneity (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The results were robust as the DOR was not overly influenced by the deletion of any single study. No publication bias was observed in this study (<i>p</i> = 0.74). Additionally, under a pre-test probability of 20%, the positive post-test probability of <i>CDO1</i> promoter methylation in lung cancer was predicted to be 42%. PROSPERO CRD420251131665, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251131665.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of <i>CDO1</i> promoter methylation in biofluids represents a promising tool for the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Future studies should focus on improving detection methodologies and investigating combinational strategies with high accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73069,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)","volume":"30 9","pages":"43987"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Landmark edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/FBL43987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1) gene promoter methylation in circulating tumor DNA as a biomarker for the early diagnosis of lung cancer.

Methods: Data up to June 5, 2025, across electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure) were searched. The quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the incorporated studies. A random-effects model was employed to generate summary statistics for diagnostic accuracy, which included pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates, the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and a summary receiver operating characteristic curve. An exploration of heterogeneity sources was undertaken using meta-regression, followed by a sensitivity analysis to test the consistency of the results. Finally, Deek's funnel plot was generated to estimate publication bias, and the clinical feasibility was evaluated using Fagan's nomogram.

Results: Seven relevant studies were included in this meta-analysis. No major concerns regarding the quality risk of the included studies were observed. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and DOR values of the CDO1 promoter methylation for lung cancer were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67), 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82), and 5.96 (95% CI: 4.06-8.74), respectively, and the area under curve was 0.7423. Statistical heterogeneity was observed in sensitivity (I2 = 73%, p < 0.1), specificity (I2 = 79.5%, p < 0.1), and DOR (I2 = 42.9%, p < 0.1); however, variables such as the region, sample source, sample size, and detection method did not significantly affect heterogeneity (p > 0.05). The results were robust as the DOR was not overly influenced by the deletion of any single study. No publication bias was observed in this study (p = 0.74). Additionally, under a pre-test probability of 20%, the positive post-test probability of CDO1 promoter methylation in lung cancer was predicted to be 42%. PROSPERO CRD420251131665, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251131665.

Conclusion: The detection of CDO1 promoter methylation in biofluids represents a promising tool for the early diagnosis of lung cancer. Future studies should focus on improving detection methodologies and investigating combinational strategies with high accuracy.

液体活检检测CDO1启动子甲基化对肺癌的诊断价值:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:评价循环肿瘤DNA中半胱氨酸双加氧酶1 (CDO1)基因启动子甲基化作为肺癌早期诊断的生物标志物。方法:检索截至2025年6月5日的电子数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和中国国家知识基础设施)。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2 (QUADAS-2)检查表评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型生成诊断准确性的汇总统计,包括合并敏感性和特异性估计、诊断优势比(DOR)和汇总受试者工作特征曲线。使用元回归对异质性来源进行了探索,随后进行了敏感性分析以检验结果的一致性。最后生成Deek漏斗图估计发表偏倚,并使用Fagan nomogram评估临床可行性。结果:本meta分析纳入了7项相关研究。未观察到对纳入研究的质量风险有重大担忧。CDO1启动子甲基化对肺癌的诊断敏感性、特异性和DOR值分别为0.63 (95% CI: 0.60-0.67)、0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82)和5.96 (95% CI: 4.06-8.74),曲线下面积为0.7423。敏感性(I2 = 73%, p < 0.1)、特异性(I2 = 79.5%, p < 0.1)和DOR (I2 = 42.9%, p < 0.1)存在统计学异质性;但区域、样本来源、样本量、检测方法等变量对异质性无显著影响(p < 0.05)。结果是可靠的,因为DOR没有受到任何单个研究的删除的过度影响。本研究未发现发表偏倚(p = 0.74)。此外,在检测前概率为20%的情况下,预测肺癌CDO1启动子甲基化检测后阳性概率为42%。PROSPERO CRD420251131665, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251131665.Conclusion:检测生物体液中CDO1启动子甲基化是一种很有前景的肺癌早期诊断工具。未来的研究应着眼于改进检测方法和研究高精度的组合策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信