Study protocol: feasibility and safety of conventional external-beam radiotherapy with an integrated stereotactic lite gross-tumour-volume boost for painful bone metastases: the HYBRID study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Shing Fung Lee, Ee Siang Choong, John Leung, Tee Lim, Sagar Ramani, Daryl Lim Joon, Craig Macleod, Jonathan Mark Tomaszewski, Jeremy Chee Seong Tey, Farshad Foroudi, Michael Chao
{"title":"Study protocol: feasibility and safety of conventional external-beam radiotherapy with an integrated stereotactic lite gross-tumour-volume boost for painful bone metastases: the HYBRID study.","authors":"Shing Fung Lee, Ee Siang Choong, John Leung, Tee Lim, Sagar Ramani, Daryl Lim Joon, Craig Macleod, Jonathan Mark Tomaszewski, Jeremy Chee Seong Tey, Farshad Foroudi, Michael Chao","doi":"10.1186/s13014-025-02723-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bone metastases cause significant pain and functional limitation. Conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) provides effective symptom relief, but local progression remains frequent. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers improved local control but is often resource-intensive and associated with higher vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rates. Integrating a simultaneous gross tumour volume (GTV) boost within a conventional EBRT regimen may provide a feasible and safe alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, multicentre, multinational, single-arm study enrolling 100 adults with painful bone metastases from solid tumours. Eligible patients receive 20 Gy in 5 fractions with a 5 Gy \"stereotactic-lite\" GTV boost (total 25 Gy) or 30 Gy in 10 fractions with a 6 Gy boost (total 36 Gy), delivered using intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. The primary endpoints are feasibility (commencement of radiotherapy within 10 working days of computed tomography simulation in at least 80% of patients) and safety (incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity within 3 months). Secondary endpoints include pain response, radiation site-specific progression-free survival, rates of VCF and long bone fracture, skeletal-related events, quality of life changes via EORTC QLQ-C30 and BM22, and overall survival.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This protocol evaluates a hybrid EBRT approach with a simultaneous integrated boost as a practical strategy to enhance local tumour control and symptom relief without delaying palliation. If feasible and safe, this approach may bridge the gap between conventional EBRT and SBRT.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12625000615482).</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"20 1","pages":"150"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12512287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-025-02723-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bone metastases cause significant pain and functional limitation. Conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) provides effective symptom relief, but local progression remains frequent. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) offers improved local control but is often resource-intensive and associated with higher vertebral compression fracture (VCF) rates. Integrating a simultaneous gross tumour volume (GTV) boost within a conventional EBRT regimen may provide a feasible and safe alternative.

Methods: This is a prospective, multicentre, multinational, single-arm study enrolling 100 adults with painful bone metastases from solid tumours. Eligible patients receive 20 Gy in 5 fractions with a 5 Gy "stereotactic-lite" GTV boost (total 25 Gy) or 30 Gy in 10 fractions with a 6 Gy boost (total 36 Gy), delivered using intensity modulated radiotherapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. The primary endpoints are feasibility (commencement of radiotherapy within 10 working days of computed tomography simulation in at least 80% of patients) and safety (incidence of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity within 3 months). Secondary endpoints include pain response, radiation site-specific progression-free survival, rates of VCF and long bone fracture, skeletal-related events, quality of life changes via EORTC QLQ-C30 and BM22, and overall survival.

Discussion: This protocol evaluates a hybrid EBRT approach with a simultaneous integrated boost as a practical strategy to enhance local tumour control and symptom relief without delaying palliation. If feasible and safe, this approach may bridge the gap between conventional EBRT and SBRT.

Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12625000615482).

研究方案:传统外束放疗结合立体定向整体肿瘤体积提升治疗疼痛性骨转移的可行性和安全性:HYBRID研究。
背景:骨转移引起明显的疼痛和功能限制。常规外束放射治疗(EBRT)提供有效的症状缓解,但局部进展仍然频繁。立体定向体放疗(SBRT)可改善局部控制,但通常需要耗费大量资源,并伴有较高的椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)发生率。在常规EBRT治疗方案中整合同时增加肿瘤总体积(GTV)可能是一种可行且安全的替代方案。方法:这是一项前瞻性、多中心、多国、单臂研究,纳入100例实体瘤骨转移患者。符合条件的患者接受5次20gy, 5次5gy“立体定向生活”GTV增强(总25gy)或10次30gy, 6 Gy增强(总36gy),使用调强放疗或体积调制电弧治疗。主要终点是可行性(至少80%的患者在计算机断层扫描模拟后10个工作日内开始放射治疗)和安全性(3个月内不良事件通用术语标准5.0级≥2级急性毒性的发生率)。次要终点包括疼痛反应、放疗部位特异性无进展生存期、VCF和长骨骨折发生率、骨骼相关事件、通过EORTC QLQ-C30和BM22测量的生活质量变化以及总生存期。讨论:该方案评估了混合EBRT方法,同时综合促进作为增强局部肿瘤控制和症状缓解而不延迟姑息的实用策略。如果可行且安全,这种方法可能弥合传统EBRT和SBRT之间的差距。试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12625000615482)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信